Update 270 — balancing of turrets and hulls

[Moraine 5,877]

Please lessen the range of isida... 

[zainslimshady 474]

since Freeze and Firebird are nerfed badly. i dont know what to do :(

i am losing interest in tanki though i purchased a lot of crystals so that i can get my guns upgraded but now my favourite guns are nerfed badly. i am looking forward to quit Tanki :(

 

it would be better to introduce atleast 1 new hull and 1 new gun in game just to keep players interested. we are bored of the same guns and hulls :/

[eg.tankman 218]

Nice job.

[Daddy-Is-Now-Here 205]

smoky every where now. rico is useless now.

[lmpe 0]

whene new kits are out???

[freestylefrost 422]

hey

[ELIZABETH1122 337]

There is an ongoing policy of re-balancing or changing the parameters of tanks, turrets and supply's, reportedly in interests of fairness.  That might be seen depending on the interest of any particular players expectations and self interest. One might accept that whole heatedly or view it  cynically as a commercial ploy to enhance sale of perhaps less popular lines at the expense of ones that have already done very well.  Without formerly calculating, most of the changes appear to be up or down only a few percent, not massive changes perhaps but changes that will negate expensive micro upgrades or even perhaps enhance them.  The enhanced survival ability of a hull might be negated by the improved fire power of some weapons.  Its all swings and roundabouts some will gain a little some lose it will all depend on the hull turret combinations of players and opponents. 

 

As this is a virtual game, one played purely on the internet, it might be perceived by the owners in not having to comply with trading laws of various Country's or  Community specifically the EEC Laws.  I am not an expert on such matters but I would not like to bet on how some changes to products here might by perceived b the Courts if perhaps organisations such as Trading Standards decided to test or force EEC Laws.  It might be one thing if this where a completely free game but something entirely different as many players have paid real cash for products and their enhancements.  

To pt it in a simple way if we were to buy a new car for instance it would not be expected, nor legal in any way if on having that car serviced by a manufacturers dealer network, that we were informed that the car that you had bought with hard earned money had been de-tuned in some way or that the in car entertainment had been made say less entertaining, in order to make another car from the same manufacturer more enticing to buy!  That would be a very strait forward legal case.  One might be tempted to look at the virtual product in exactly the same way.  To change the parameters in a negative way for a product bought from now on is OK but not those already bought and owned.  It would be like saying that the expensive all protective paint that you had bought to enhance your tank is now not only unavailable for new people attaining a certain rank but that because you also are not of that rank now and even though you bought the expensive paint legally at the time of purchase it is to be removed  taken from your Garage.

 

In my view it might be better perhaps to enhance some products but not others but not to degrade any.  The net effect might be over all the same  but might be viewed differently by many.  Perhaps even to leave existing players the same and all new plays having to comply with changes in specification and  re-balance as would happen in the real world with non virtual products.

 

At this point having not been here that long I am not complaining, only summarizing and musing!

 

  

Edited July 3, 2014 by ELIZABETH1122

[ugocon 20]

OK. I've just ended a DM in Polygon and see what happened:

there was a Freeze who was constantly using full drugs (he was the only one in the match doing it) and was accumulating points one after the other in few seconds killing everybody as crazy!! (he won in a short time)

In the past I could kill myself as soon as I saw him approaching (no way to escape to such a monster...) and the match would have been more interesting IMO.

Now, you just need one of this guys (figure if there are more than one...) and the match has little sense to continue...

[Jolly.Jumper 28]

some weapons have become weaker. I guess

Edited July 3, 2014 by Jolly.Jumper

[Vikk 190]

I don't like the new self-destruct update.

[eg.tankman 218]

I don't like the new self-destruct update.

I do :D

[ugocon 20]

At this point having not been here that long I am not complaining, only summarizing and musing!

 

  

How's that you have 2 red stars if you''ve not been here that long???

You had a fast carreer...

;)

[ugocon 20]

But the self destruct penalty is effective also if you press DEL to self destruct when you turn upside down by mistake???

:huh:

[ELIZABETH1122 337]

But the self destruct penalty is effective also if you press DEL to self destruct when you turn upside down by mistake???

:huh:

That is a very good point.  

[The_Pakistani 16,768]

OK. I've just ended a DM in Polygon and see what happened:

there was a Freeze who was constantly using full drugs (he was the only one in the match doing it) and was accumulating points one after the other in few seconds killing everybody as crazy!! (he won in a short time)

In the past I could kill myself as soon as I saw him approaching (no way to escape to such a monster...) and the match would have been more interesting IMO.

Now, you just need one of this guys (figure if there are more than one...) and the match has little sense to continue...

Simply quited the game n deciding(But not decided yet) to quit playing TO.. Cheers..

[cyclops101 3]

Oh thanks -.- . I try to report someone by doing that and u say its fair.

:angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:

[Solid-Granit 30]

There is an ongoing policy of re-balancing or changing the parameters of tanks, turrets and supply's, reportedly in interests of fairness.  That might be seen depending on the interest of any particular players expectations and self interest. One might accept that whole heatedly or view it  cynically as a commercial ploy to enhance sale of perhaps less popular lines at the expense of ones that have already done very well.  Without formerly calculating, most of the changes appear to be up or down only a few percent, not massive changes perhaps but changes that will negate expensive micro upgrades or even perhaps enhance them.  The enhanced survival ability of a hull might be negated by the improved fire power of some weapons.  Its all swings and roundabouts some will gain a little some lose it will all depend on the hull turret combinations of players and opponents. 

 

As this is a virtual game, one played purely on the internet, it might be perceived by the owners in not having to comply with trading laws of various Country's or  Community specifically the EEC Laws.  I am not an expert on such matters but I would not like to bet on how some changes to products here might by perceived b the Courts if perhaps organisations such as Trading Standards decided to test or force EEC Laws.  It might be one thing if this where a completely free game but something entirely different as many players have paid real cash for products and their enhancements.  

To pt it in a simple way if we were to buy a new car for instance it would not be expected, nor legal in any way if on having that car serviced by a manufacturers dealer network, that we were informed that the car that you had bought with hard earned money had been de-tuned in some way or that the in car entertainment had been made say less entertaining, in order to make another car from the same manufacturer more enticing to buy!  That would be a very strait forward legal case.  One might be tempted to look at the virtual product in exactly the same way.  To change the parameters in a negative way for a product bought from now on is OK but not those already bought and owned.  It would be like saying that the expensive all protective paint that you had bought to enhance your tank is now not only unavailable for new people attaining a certain rank but that because you also are not of that rank now and even though you bought the expensive paint legally at the time of purchase it is to be removed  taken from your Garage.

 

In my view it might be better perhaps to enhance some products but not others but not to degrade any.  The net effect might be over all the same  but might be viewed differently by many.  Perhaps even to leave existing players the same and all new plays having to comply with changes in specification and  re-balance as would happen in the real world with non virtual products.

 

At this point having not been here that long I am not complaining, only summarizing and musing!

 

  

I BY LAST PAST REFRESHING PROPOSED, THAT WOULD BE NEEDED FOR A COURT GATHERED UP TO TURN BECAUSE THE PRODUCTS BOUGHT FOR THE REAL MONEY MODIFY HIS PARAMETERS UNILATERALLY. A BANK DOES NOT DARE TO DO THIS SO OPENLY

 

there is not a complaint treatment compared to an European manner (here only for each other scribble, nobody competent looks at it) it is announced in the rules of the game furthermore, if something does not like it is possible to stop the game promptly. barbarians.

Edited July 3, 2014 by Solid-Granit

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

I have not played Tanki since the new update is out. Is that true that if you kill the same tank very fast, you got less point for the second kill????

[hesham_king 11]

Good Updates!

[shadowWalker89 67]

What is wrong with you ?

Why did you decrease the top speed of mammoth, not cool :angry:

[r_G0ldmode_ON0 2]

since update in most battles everybody got lag!

pleas gix it

[The_Pakistani 16,768]

I have not played Tanki since the new update is out. Is that true that if you kill the same tank very fast, you got less point for the second kill????

Yes! its true n it sucks. Killing the same tank again isn't power leveling when you're playing TDM with Shaft M3 to kill a noob wasp m2 -_- Edited July 3, 2014 by The_Pakistani

[r_HeavyArtillery0 1]

Freeze was already Nerfed :( ,  and this update made it 'MORE NERFED' :angry: . Its range has radically decreased, and the damage too. Moreover, isida can remove the freeze effect. Isida is more Overpowered. Now we will see isida packs come together in game, healing from behind and take the flag or score in tdm. Freeze cant stop them because isida heals health, freeze effect and same 15m range.     

[King.Ghost 44]

what does it mean by penalty or self desturction?

[aperaiderpistol 459]

You decreased Titans health and speed :( But I still love it :D