Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Tanki Online V-LOG: Episode 5


semyonkirov
 Share

Recommended Posts

Feedback:

 

I see 2 pages of "Good job" messages, heres a little feedback.

 

I've been getting upset with an ever increasing number of cheaters and saboteurs of late. Now that I know the /vote command is more effective, I will use it more often. I never use it lightly.  Playing 10v10 is great but 5v15, (10 on the enemy side and 5 on your own side), grrr!

 

Semyon didn't say how many Battle Violation Mods there are in this new group.

 

June in numbers.

40,000 battles reviewed

460 cheaters (compared to 42 in May)

5,000 saboteurs disciplined.

 

I take it these numbers are just from yellow battles and not the forum?

The numbers are reassuring to a point and I welcome the changes but I feel more needs to be done.

A battle link just turning yellow is very limited and confined.

 

When I type /vote in a battle, it is usually to report someone who has entered a battle, has a good rank and tank, whose score is on 0 for ages clearly not trying.

 

It would be beneficial if we could include a bit of information to assist the Mods.

How difficult would it be if we could write a short description when using the command?

eg, /vote BadTanker "In battle for 10mins and 0pts, BF15K"

The delivery system probably isn't up to the job.

 

Is tanki currently working on players moderation?

 

The team kick idea was a good idea but flawed because it was based on battle score alone.

Anyone who understands a little maths will agree that the team kick idea but be better suited to include average score.

eg, Player1, has 1000 pts and has played for 20mins giving an average of 50pts per min, should not be able vote for Player2 who has been in the battle for 10mins and has a score of 600pts, (average of 60pts per min).  Player2 couldn't vote for Player1 because Player1 has more pts but both Player1 and Player2 can vote for kicking Player3 who has been in the battle 30 minutes has a score of 300pts or 10pts per minute on average.

 

Maybe you could expand on this in the next vlog. Thank you for this one. Nice work!

Edited by AbsoluteZero
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

agree on /vote command needs to be reinstated with improvements. Vlog itself is a better form of communication than what was happening in forum before. Personally I think the cheaters and the mults are worse again from school being out.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feedback:

 

I see 2 pages of "Good job" messages, heres a little feedback.

 

I've been getting upset with an ever increasing number of cheaters and saboteurs of late. Now that I know the /vote command is more effective, I will use it more often. I never use it lightly.  Playing 10v10 is great but 5v15, (10 on the enemy side and 5 on your own side), grrr!

 

Semyon didn't say how many Battle Violation Mods there are in this new group.

 

June in numbers.

40,000 battles reviewed

460 cheaters (compared to 42 in May)

5,000 saboteurs disciplined.

 

I take it these numbers are just from yellow battles and not the forum?

The numbers are reassuring to a point and I welcome the changes but I feel more needs to be done.

A battle link just turning yellow is very limited and confined.

 

When I type /vote in a battle, it is usually to report someone who has entered a battle, has a good rank and tank, whose score is on 0 for ages clearly not trying.

 

It would be beneficial if we could include a bit of information to assist the Mods.

How difficult would it be if we could write a short description when using the command?

eg, /vote BadTanker "In battle for 10mins and 0pts, BF15K"

The delivery system probably isn't up to the job.

 

Is tanki currently working on players moderation?

 

The team kick idea was a good idea but flawed because it was based on battle score alone.

Anyone who understands a little maths will agree that the team kick idea but be better suited to include average score.

eg, Player1, has 1000 pts and has played for 20mins giving an average of 50pts per min, should not be able vote for Player2 who has been in the battle for 10mins and has a score of 600pts, (average of 60pts per min).  Player2 couldn't vote for Player1 because Player1 has more pts but both Player1 and Player2 can vote for kicking Player3 who has been in the battle 30 minutes has a score of 300pts or 10pts per minute on average.

 

Maybe you could expand on this in the next vlog. Thank you for this one. Nice work!

nice text +1 :) and you are right in what you say....

Edited by xaris52

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...