Self-destruct damage opponents

[Hecaterus 31]

As all of you know self-destructing cost you 1 kill and 1 death(of course) which is kinda unworth it so most of us prefer to avoid it as much as possible but what if everytime you self-destruct you will damage the tanks near you? Its gonna be fun because you can take your enemy with you so you wont feel lonely dying alone.

You can also go suicide bombing if you are low on health this way if it is use properly the losing team can get a big turn around in the game and you can also upgrade the area of effect and damage of self-destructing in your garage. How awesome is that?

[MyLife_MyReign 256]

Not taking the enemy with you but lessening his health.1 kill is not required.What is the use of the new update if self-destructing takes the enemy with you?

[GG_reg 1,524]

As all of you know self-destructing cost you 1 kill and 1 death(of course) which is kinda unworth it so most of us prefer to avoid it as much as possible but what if everytime you self-destruct you will damage the tanks near you? Its gonna be fun because you can take your enemy with you so you wont feel lonely dying alone. You can also go suicide bombing if you are low on health this way if it is use properly the losing team can get a big turn around in the game and you can also upgrade the area of effect and damage of self-destructing in your garage. How awesome is that?

It would ruin the objective of the game (it is not based around self-destruct). Anyway, it wouldn't be called self-destruct if you killed your enemies too! :P

[Hecaterus 31]

Not taking the enemy with you but lessening his health.1 kill is not required.What is the use of the new update if self-destructing takes the enemy with you?

yes, thats what I mean.

[Hecaterus 31]

It would ruin the objective of the game (it is not based around self-destruct). Anyway, it wouldn't be called self-destruct if you killed your enemies too! :P

I meant only damaging the health not taking them with you thats why I mentioned you can upgrade the damage in your garage.

[tommybau 1,033]

remove the 1 kill penality from the self destruction. thunders are really penalized, and high recoils gun are sometimed advantaged cause they can flip back

[Hecaterus 31]

remove the 1 kill penality from the self destruction. thunders are really penalized, and high recoils gun are sometimed advantaged cause they can flip back

yes I know how you feel. I love using thunders and I always go shoot and suicide when a freeze backstabs me. I dont like the -1 kill penalty also thats why I came up with this idea.

[alnyach 0]

i want it to be like that cause i use thunder it sucks for losing 1 kill for self destruction and it feel more realistic cause if you go exploding anyone near you will be damage by the selfdestruct explosions

[alnyach 0]

remove the -1 kill or put damage when your tank explodes

[BlitzPanzer12345 241]

put back the self-destruct part - the one before the update

[r_Kamyas0 0]

i had the same idea but i was too lazy to sign in and post it. lol

[magnaboy2 656]

I like this,when you're on low health and you go press delete,and you self-destruct before getting killed,you'll do damage,but when you don't SD,and just get killed,you don't do damage! What a wonderfull idea and nice use.

[r_lee676720000 0]

There should be a kmakasi feture that blow your tank as well as other enemy tanks. Just ramdom

[Papaya14 481]

You watched the Vlog too? I think it was more of a joke. :)  The mine is already similar enough, but without blowing yourself up in the process.

[Kevred 1,586]

*Kamikaze

 

Usually kamikaze tactics are balanced, as not everyone is willing to do it. But in a game where you have infinite lives and receive little to no penalty for dying...

[dilsharox 2,395]

this could be used as a tactic & this has been suggested before so i like it

[Maf 32,326]

 

There should be a kmakasi feture that blow your tank as well as other enemy tanks. Just ramdom

Duplicate topics merged

[jazz20 1,181]

people would constantly self-destruct, which wouldn't be good

[Yisroel.Rabin 16,224]

Maybe I understand wrong, but, wouldn't this defeat the purpose of the penalty?