Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

The firebird is real.


 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

Well, actually they do not all exist in reality.

 

 

 

they all exist bt not in da form as v it in the game

tanki hv jst made them look even better & advanced so it'll suit the game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I have one of those bad boys in another *cough* unmentioned game, which sadly doesn't have the Crocodile installed, but its visible where it would be mounted.

 

 

1zvpf82.png

 

HD

ahducdhcdfh  :wacko:

Edited by tiger_of_malaysia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

actually thats the flamethrower mouted from KV-2 

History lesson: The KV-2 was called the "Dreadnought" or the "Flamethrower" after the blast produced by the artillery gun mounted on it, but it never carried an actual flamethrower. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I have one of those bad boys in another *cough* unmentioned game, which sadly doesn't have the Crocodile installed, but its visible where it would be mounted.

 

 

1zvpf82.png

 

:wub:  :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

History lesson: The KV-2 was called the "Dreadnought" or the "Flamethrower" after the blast produced by the artillery gun mounted on it, but it never carried an actual flamethrower. 

flamethrower design for antibunker purpose and short range battle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe its in another churchill 

Obviously 


or its in the KV 2

History lesson: The KV-2 was called the "Dreadnought" or the "Flamethrower" after the blast produced by the artillery gun mounted on it, but it never carried an actual flamethrower. 


flamethrower design for antibunker purpose and short range battle

That really had nothing to do with what I said. Please, make sense in your post in accordance to what you're replying to.


 

This topic is a bit dried out by now... If nothing but historical arguments will persist to emerge I suggest to close it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is a bit dried out by now... If nothing but historical arguments will persist to emerge I suggest to close it.

Why would you want to close it? Is it hurting you to be open. Maybe somebody in the future may want to say something. That's one of the problems in this forum, topics get closed too quickly for no reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...