Firebird is a dead weapon

[R8s 4]

:fire_r: Hello guys and girls! ;)

 

Have made the cure or treatment with Isida completely neutralize the effect of fire, leave this totally ridiculous and obsolete weapon (Firebird) :huh: . This means, in my modest opinion, that players do not use the weapon, unless they have adequate supplies of healing power and protection, and also whether it is holding the m3.

 

In small upgrades there are two parameters that are not useful :unsure:  in this weapon (Firebird), which is the time of burning and damage, these two parameters are futile since, with a box of cure or if you upload a Isida damage reversed :angry: , specifically secondary damage to Expocision fire.

 

I would have loved :wub:  :P that the damage caused by the fire OVEREXPOSURE remained intact, this way the weapon would be equated to the other. For example, the damage caused by Ricochet is the most harm that could cause a gun.

 

Therefore not properly balanced the weapons in a game. :(

 

thank you very much :fire_l:  :tank:

[Meowmix56 174]

I agree that firebird does seem underutilized by many players.  However I disagree with the reason.  The damage is still useful and even the best isida can't be everywhere at once.  In dm they won't help at all.  I think the decline of firebird is instead due to the proliferation of drugs.  A bit more damage won't help much against an opponent with double health, first aid, and able to deal double damage.  Meanwhile in exchange for marginally less damage freeze has become the most important asset to any team.  Able to slow druggers enough that a team can focus fire.

[trombone_ftw 734]

I found that hard to understand...

[pizzaslad 471]

Pssh see me in a battle with it and we will see how dead it is

[Zangetsu9 128]

you could use firebird to steal kills now its the oppisite people steal kills from firebird 

[HiS.RoYaL.HiGhNeSs 2,036]

I think that The Firebird Benefit for attack As for the freeze is to defend........

 

As for myself, I chose to freeze

 

You and your choice

[deathfromabove_tanki 92]

frankly that did not make a lot of sense.

[Amagi 1,728]

Firebird is as deadly as ever!

There are many Freeze paint so people are using Firebird as an alternative. Few people buy Loam these days.

[masoud_b 678]

firebird is enough powerful

and your right , rico really harms

 

most of things in this game need to be balanced again but who knows ? maybe the person who balances turrets has firebird and he\she also hates rico and freeze

( if you check the changes on TO updates you can find out , in past freeze m1's damage was higher than the new freeze m2 ! and also ricochet's shots decreases , but how about fire ? every time firebird's damage get higher and higher )

[dilsharox 2,395]

i agree with your opinion

[deathfromabove_tanki 92]

Isida does reverse the firebird afterburner affect for two seconds, so if your lucky enough to have an isida nearby you cannot be healed.

[Thekillerpenguin 1,731]

Firebird isn't too effective against heavy druggers who still have a First Aid kit available, since they can be up to full health very quickly if they time the activation right. Isida support makes it less useful, but if you can BBQ the Isida along with your target, you can cause a lot of damage.

 

In NS battles, Firebird is exceptionally powerful, since there will be less people with First Aid.

 

I still think that Firebird is best used in ambush attacks against lone targets, where an opponent will have less time to react and will have trouble finding a nearby Isida. Most of Firebird's properties lend itself to that kind of gameplay too; the recharge is pretty long, and it can cause massive damage within a short time frame, so get in, unload your napalm, and get out.

[deathfromabove_tanki 92]

Ok this article looks like my little sister wrote it.

Very poorly written.