Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Let's discuss "Interviews with History"


 Share

Recommended Posts

An empty garage was my kinda twist on the fact that most players believe that moderators/admins have full m3 garage ;)

 

Also, thanks for the thoughts and compliments so far, for both Barba and me. And for the cookie! :)

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. My point is that 6 questions, most of which aren't answered fully isn't enough for a meaty, chunky interview. This is more like a written down chat.

2. As I said, the last few questions weren't really answered well. Perhaps if you had given the staff more time to write better responses, the overall quality would improve.

3. Firstly, there's no need to be rude in your comment. Grammar is something along with other things that contribute to a high quality piece of work. This interview is official, from a company, just like a newspaper, but a newspaper does not have any mistakes as it is proofread before being published. In my post, I am not only talking about grammar, there are other issues.

 

I am rather disappointed to see that my comment has now just been downgraded to a rant. I don't understand why, just because I thought the interview had points to improve, I am now fighting against the staff. Had that comment come from ANYONE ELSE, I'm sure they would not be labelled as a staff-hater.

Ladies, Ladies, you are both the most beautiful women on the internet

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Todays' interview has been deleted - sorry for the inconvenience, but there were not enough arguments to be posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Todays' interview has been deleted - sorry for the inconvenience, but there were not enough arguments to be posted.

Understandable, "the more arguments, the better" is the way I see it. ;)

 

Just kidding. No worries, at least it's good to see you prefer quality over quantity now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All you seem to be looking at is the fact that I said there were grammar errors. That is NOT the main point, so please stop pounding me about that. Look at the interviews in the Developers' News. Surely Semyon is even busier than I_F or whoever, and that's delivered to a great standard.

 

 

EN Administration - official as of the EN community, therefore I still feel that grammar and the other factors I pointed out should be considered. And I_F again I see you edited your post to say thanks, after saying I'm fighting against the staff. And look, have you heard of something called a critic? I'm just trying to help this improve, and I have not received any kind comments, just that I am a staff-hater and fighting against the administration.

Why guys fighting ???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...