Revision in the number of Active Servers

[r_ChallengerII0 2]

nice idea... but lag will be very bad then. you need to update and make lag less somehow. (if thats possible :P)

Thats why update shockwave flash player

[r_ChallengerII0 2]

One of reasons why I'm playing on EN servers is because they are lagging less than RU and DE do.

Now we'll lose that :/

Duh, I'm a german.......

[r_ChallengerII0 2]

Reminds me of Tanki before with it's 27 servers

Well, it makes it easier for me to find my lost best mate Sovietmachine

[DarkOperative 5,580]

I hope this doesn't cause increase in amount of lags as the lag depends on the server population to what I've experienced playing, it isn't much of a deal though. 

 

Nice amendment! :D

[red_tank_the_best 300]

Duh, I'm a german.......

So?

[r_PC-JACK0 91]

Great I love this decision. More players give us more maps to play. In the English community all but 2 servers are virtually  empty in the evening (16:00 to 00:00) here in the america community. Thanks Tanki. :):)

[pwhite 120]

Like with most updates, I could care less.

[I-Iero 823]

EN 20, never forget

[Technoman1130 0]

So...the servers are down...did it start?

[epanastasi1821 80]

I think there will be forever a conflict of interest here, and I believe the only real answer is that you can request whatever type of battle you are looking for and it will tell you where it is happening regardless of server. I realise this is probably not possible but I live in hope....... What you are doing is probably the best solution AT THE MOMENT!

[jomama_tanker 117]

Less servers ~ More lags

If I had to guess, the lag is less a server side issue and more a client-side issue.

 

I can tell you with 100% certainty that I experience performance differences (esp. severe lag) under specific circumstances including problematic Internet connections, slow connections, too many apps running on the client hardware, and even a low battery charge (on my laptop). All of those issues can cause my fps to drop to well below 10.

 

As for fewer servers....it depends on whether we're talking about physical and/or virtual servers and the hardware specifics.  Fewer servers does not always equal decreased performance.

Edited October 14, 2014 by jomama_tanker

[infamous 94]

just a suggestion... you should fill up a specific server to maximum capacity first. Once this paticular server is full, only then the next available or open server should be displayed/ available to join.

 

If some user leaves the full server, thus creating slots open, the system should automatically make new users/ joiners fill it up on priority before moving to the next avaialbe server with open slots.

 

look into it.

[Madscorpion 81]

Woah another update? The last update was a couple days ago, when they updated the Kits. But this is why I love you guys, always updating the game at least once or twice a week, making the game better for everyone :)

Edited October 14, 2014 by Madscorpion

[ThouShallNot 963]

yes thank you, theres barely any battles for my rank, too many generallissimo battles... :D

[T3-T3 93]

 

 

Why i even rank up :rolleyes:

 

I wanna get level down :D :D

is it possible ? :blink:

Edited October 14, 2014 by T3-T3

[Manly_man 86]

It's the server where my clan goes to training!! D:

[r_O.E.S0 1]

:D  :fire_r:  :fire_l: 

[Hassaan_Riaz 39]

:( not good there us lagg!!! but many battles :>

[Doo0ooh 0]

Is  there a way to find all battles fitting some ranks and maps through different servers? If no, could that be implemented in the near future?

 

It would be so much handier to know for example, that server 5 had a Fort Knox game going on where my ranks fits and there are still some places in it. That way, I wouldn't have to load server 1, then server 2, then server 3, etc... and when I arrive at server 5 the game is finished :(

[SportsKing700 153]

You guys said that the battle will be easy to find that fit our rank. Well, it has gotten worse i can't find a battle and when i join one finally, there are mults so it doesn't matter anymore 

[AliceTreatPU 92]

Noo, i dont like this.

Because i like when opponent team lack player

:P :P :P :P

[newrohan 1,040]

just a suggestion... you should fill up a specific server to maximum capacity first. Once this paticular server is full, only then the next available or open server should be displayed/ available to join.

 

If some user leaves the full server, thus creating slots open, the system should automatically make new users/ joiners fill it up on priority before moving to the next avaialbe server with open slots.

 

look into it.

What if some people want to meet in a particular server?

[gio_the_killer 836]

we want 50% off on whole garage  :angry:

[Rob 141]

RU has more servers, I think EN community should have 15 servers...

[Musty9 51]

just a suggestion... you should fill up a specific server to maximum capacity first. Once this paticular server is full, only then the next available or open server should be displayed/ available to join.

 

If some user leaves the full server, thus creating slots open, the system should automatically make new users/ joiners fill it up on priority before moving to the next avaialbe server with open slots.

 

look into it.

Great idea more lag for certain players and its also good as it would be harder for maybe a whole group of friends to join a server congrats on not thinking the consequences of this :)