Drugging - Old Tanki vs New Tanki

[fufususumumu1 240]

 

@Corpsecrusher: And that's an opinion. ^_^

An opinion that has already been categorized as horrible, and impossible to extremely not likely - justified with valid evidence and points.

 

Sure it may bring satisfactory to you, but again, the game doesn't revolve around you, and there is a business behind it, something you don't seem to understand.

Also, you guess a person's age just by their typing/vocabulary? That's such an ignorant claim.

Just another excuse so you feel that it's ok for you to just spam pointless posts, etc. etc.

 

listen didyouknowthat, i have read your posts and i see that u DO make valid points, until u started to respond to corpsecrusher. since then onwards u were just focussing on trolling him. what he is saying is that the language you are using is not as easy to understand... it might be english, but some 14+ year olds like us have trouble understanding what you are saying, we have to research the dictionnary for about half an hour for this stuff... u might say that we are 2nd graders for not understanding and that we are foolish but this level of language isnt used until 12th grade (and that is only in english class lol). we are open to listen to your comments but please put it forward in a clear and understandable so that everyone can understand. also keep in mind that this is a game so you shouldnt be surprised if u find children as young as nine years old in the forum.

please respond with constructive criticism and dont troll

this is not meant to be taken in a harsh way so please don't start trolling or whatever.

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

Can you point out the parts of my posts that you find to be "trolling?" People can get offended so easily. Lol. :lol:

Also, my age is not far from the age you mentioned. You should NOT judge a person's age by his/her typing ability. That's ignorant.

 

It is clear and understandable. But I guess some people can only read posts such as text-messages. -Sigh-

Oh well.

 

And that level of English is NOT used until the 12th grade, you have no idea what you're talking about. In 12th grade, the grammar and vocabulary should be much higher quality. Your exaggerations make it tough to take you seriously. It's the equivalent to blind accusations and whining.

 

And? Do 9 year old kids belong here? At least take a glance at what you agree to when entering forums. Lol.

 

My criticism would be straight-forward, but I reply in the same attitude as the person would reply back.

[ThouShallNot 963]

Can you point out the parts of my posts that you find to be "trolling?" People can get offended so easily. Lol. :lol:

Also, my age is not far from the age you mentioned. You should NOT judge a person's age by his/her typing ability. That's ignorant.

 

It is clear and understandable. But I guess some people can only read posts such as text-messages. -Sigh-

Oh well.

 

And that level of English is NOT used until the 12th grade, you have no idea what you're talking about. In 12th grade, the grammar and vocabulary should be much higher quality. Your exaggerations make it tough to take you seriously. It's the equivalent to blind accusations and whining.

 

And? Do 9 year old kids belong here? At least take a glance at what you agree to when entering forums. Lol.

 

My criticism would be straight-forward, but I reply in the same attitude as the person would reply back.

buyers are using health packs now, since i only get like 20 health packs a week, its not enough to combat buyers, buyers buy drugs so they have more health packs than me, one way solving that problem is removing kits ._.

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

Except that option is not available, given the points I had said before.

Edited November 7, 2014 by r_DidYouKnowThat0

[ThouShallNot 963]

Except that option is not available, given the points I had said before.

not available? pff what do you mean, the devs can do that, you saying they cant?

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

It's physically possible sure, but it's still not an option. Looks like we're repeating this whole thing again. :lol:

[Truthteller 4,204]

u frickin flooder!!

i jjust hope it was a computer problem and not on purpose

and btw tanki put those drug kits to make more buyers, the cool thing is  that it is not so bad to make people leave but it does make the game a little unbalanced and thats the aim of tanki, to give buyers the slight advantage of the game required as they are the ones filling their pockets

Buyers do not run this game  :mellow:

[fufususumumu1 240]

 

Buyers do not run this game  :mellow:

 

and that is also one more reason why tanki is balanced as opposed to earlier when buyers could get an overload of drugs and take out all the players at low ranks who are non-buyers... this is not as bad as now when everyone without drugs have a good chance of taking out a drugger who can maximum use two drugs at the same time with his supplies

Edited November 8, 2014 by fufususumumu1

[magnaboy2 656]

Tanki Online is a game that WILL change in the future. So instead of dwelling/struggling and/or discussing problems in the past, just move on already. Sure we can remember back then in 2012-2013, but no need to keep whining about how "good" it was back then especially since it's an opinion, not any sort of fact - even if the majority of the people we see think so. TO ain't ditching any of their newer updates, especially how they worked so long for them. . .

2012-2013 were not good times,2010-2011 was...

We have the rights to express our opinions ^-^

+The main reason people started drugging alot more then back in those old days is because drugs were more like "premium stuff" back then,now you get a HUGE amount of drugs in your daily bonus,while back then,you wouldn't get as much as now...

The drugkits also came,but they were aimed to the BUYERS,which are rare to see without another kit yk...

 

BTW GUYS,on the DE Forum some staff said that the "normal" drugs will be back in pro battles :)

SO JUST WAIT AND SEE

Also express how much you hate this new cooldowns update xD (← is a joke yk)

 

 

Edited November 9, 2014 by magnaboy2

[RustyNail 1,538]

...

Also express how much you hate this new cooldowns update xD

 

 

How much more should I do it? LOL I'm sick and tired of the update, AND NOT THAT I WANT OLD 234 TO COME BACK...

[magnaboy2 656]

Well,look,you're expressing your hate right now XD
But that expressing was a joke yk

Edited November 9, 2014 by magnaboy2

[fufususumumu1 240]

then what DO u want rusty? u don't like the 234 gameplay and the new update, so is or was there any other drugging tactic in the game? heard a lot about people not drugging in the earlier times, and i would like u to answer why was that? according to new players like me, drugs would be very helpful, i dont understand why it wasnt popular those days

[fufususumumu1 240]

-deleted-.

Edited November 10, 2014 by fufususumumu1

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

@ fufususumumu1: It's quite a surprise it took you this long to finally choose to block me. I would've thought you'd do it sooner.

Also, do keep in mind that this would be PUBLIC forums. What you are doing would only affect me directly if it were in PMs. :lol:

 

And if you can actually read English, my posts do reside within the topic. However, it's not my fault that the only English you can read is the equivalent to text messages on a phone. Also, if you actually took a step back and looked at the whole scenario, it would be YOU acting like a clown.

 

Also, tooting my own horn about how smart I am? Oh sorry, my fault for understanding how the game works and discussing why the idea wouldn't work. Get it? You're supposed to discuss the topic, not make lies about someone. What a hypocrite.

 

Also, I wouldn't use the term brainless. It is only a couple of people who are simply ignorant and choose to be narrow-minded. Which is why they have no strong argument, and tend to resort to calling me names and saying how I don't understand. In this case, you're saying that my posts are simply wasting space when you obviously don't know how to read. Do work on your comprehension skills and try to come up with better arguments.

 

And if you do and simply cannot come up with arguments, and yet still persist to resort to immature backlash, then you simply do not acknowledge who is right and who is wrong, and simply not open to new ways of seeing things. Hence my usage of "narrow-minded."

 

Nowhere am I trying to toot my own horn. I'm simply defending the arguments that I present. I make valid reasons. You don't. Instead, you're the one wasting space here with that post. You seriously cannot back up anything you say. So have fun living in your own world. After all, ignorance seems to be your dominant trait.

 

But true, I wouldn't count on much common sense or logic coming from someone who's actions show this much immaturity. Sorry, but the world does not revolve around you. It reflects that you think so when you start trying to get others to "ignore" me as well. I simply am not the right audience for you, since I propose arguments and points that you cannot counter against.

 

However, when you propose an idea, especially in a topic, be prepared to actually discuss it, not just say "yes" or "no" to it. And if you can't, then stay out of it instead of making pointless insults. I'm not the one getting upset. I'm just presenting my points.

 

So I would suggest you to calm down, and not be so angry. Lol.

 

(edit) Good job. You edited and thus deleted your post. Know your limits. :lol:

Edited November 10, 2014 by r_DidYouKnowThat0

[RustyNail 1,538]

then what DO u want rusty? u don't like the 234 gameplay and the new update, so is or was there any other drugging tactic in the game? heard a lot about people not drugging in the earlier times, and i would like u to answer why was that? according to new players like me, drugs would be very helpful, i dont understand why it wasnt popular those days

Unfortunately, I want the opposite of TO Administration. Less drugging time in battle. The answer to 234 is not this drug interaction but simply the increase of cooling period for each drug. No interactions, no restrictions, other than the initial increase of each drug's cooling period.

Thus, even a player used to 234, would have to spend a period (after using the drugs) without them. Did he use 234? Then for a certain amount of time he can use no drug at all. Did he use only one or two? Then for this amount of time he can't use again this one or these two drugs. Simple.

But kids don't think and they usually don't understand that, so the issue generally remains an issue of whether we play 234 or we play with "smart" cooldown... Pfff....

[tommybau 1,033]

New Tanki for the win!!

Guys, check out some of the videos on how to use smart cooldowns. I think that people don't like the new system because they CAN'T use the new system. "You fear what you do not understand!"

go on the contest section and look at the video tutorials on how to use supplies. most of you probably need to learn how to use supplies. the dude above me is totally right.

[fufususumumu1 240]

-deleted-.

Edited November 11, 2014 by fufususumumu1

[fufususumumu1 240]

 

not available? pff what do you mean, the devs can do that, you saying they cant?

 

just dont bother returning posts to him. he is hopeless! just block and ur problems will be solved. ignorance is bliss :D . try it it actually works!

and about supplies i agree with the guy above me. but the main reason i feel that players hate it is because they cant take double powered railguns shooting at u.

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

@Fufususumumu1: Right. I manage to counter all his opposing points with my own, and make him think otherwise, and yet you still say that I'm "hopeless."

All the facts are against you, and you still fail to acknowledge anything. Good luck on embarrassing yourself. Lel. :lol:

Try to come up with a solid argument next time, not just throwing a temper. Maybe that's why you think I'm being condescending. You're bringing it onto yourself. Lol!

 

@Rustynail: The solution your thinking of makes drug-use in a battle inconsistent in a way. . .

The way you put it, there'll be a small surge of drug use, and then a long(er) cooldown. However still, you'd have 234 drugged tanks going head on with each other, which cancels out the affects. Then, when they've no drugs to defend themselves with due to the longer cooldown, they are easily taken down by others who will drug right after.

 

Though the Smart Cooldowns were meant to bring in strategy, all while keeping drug-use consistent. When drug-use remains consistent, and when only a few can be used at once at your leisure, you get a more balanced, flowing, and dynamic battle. . .

 

Again, there is more than one way of doing things. So calling anyone who simply doesn't "get" that way of doing things a "kid" would be inaccurate, and in my opinion, arrogant.

Edited November 11, 2014 by r_DidYouKnowThat0

[fufususumumu1 240]

 

Unfortunately, I want the opposite of TO Administration. Less drugging time in battle. The answer to 234 is not this drug interaction but simply the increase of cooling period for each drug. No interactions, no restrictions, other than the initial increase of each drug's cooling period.

Thus, even a player used to 234, would have to spend a period (after using the drugs) without them. Did he use 234? Then for a certain amount of time he can use no drug at all. Did he use only one or two? Then for this amount of time he can't use again this one or these two drugs. Simple.

But kids don't think and they usually don't understand that, so the issue generally remains an issue of whether we play 234 or we play with "smart" cooldown... Pfff....

 

to admins say that this allows for more skill. increasing cooldown time still allows u to use all three so i dont think it might change much...

and also one more problem with 234 drugs is that once u run out of drugs u have very little chance to survive (applies to the highest ranks because all of them use 234) after ur drugs are depleted. this means that they will be killed almost instantly and after respawn they can again use all three again so the time waiting period is just nulled out so basically they just have to press 234 every respawn. i dont think tanki wanted this and also wanted to satisfy players anger towards druggers making it very difficult to play... but i have seen this general dissatisfaction against smart cool downs by high rankers... why is it so?? i always thought that after the update the nooby low ranked druggers would cry about the fact that they couldnt beat the poop out of others their rank. but it is the high rankers, thats why i am confused.

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

@Fufususumumu1: Finally, a reasonable post. :lol:

[RustyNail 1,538]

@Rustynail: The solution your thinking of makes drug-use in a battle inconsistent in a way. . .

The way you put it, there'll be a small surge of drug use, and then a long(er) cooldown. However still, you'd have 234 drugged tanks going head on with each other, which cancels out the affects. Then, when they've no drugs to defend themselves with due to the longer cooldown, they are easily taken down by others who will drug right after.

 

Though the Smart Cooldowns were meant to bring in strategy, all while keeping drug-use consistent. When drug-use remains consistent, and when only a few can be used at once at your leisure, you get a more balanced, flowing, and dynamic battle. . .

 

Again, there is more than one way of doing things. So calling anyone who simply doesn't "get" that way of doing things a "kid" would be inaccurate, and in my opinion, arrogant.

Dude, do me a favor: stop messing with me in relation to this topic. You purposely twist the meaning of my words.

What I proposed has only one disadvantage according to TO, and that is that Tanki would require LESS drugs to be played. PERIOD.

 

As for the term "kids" - a good example of twisting what I say - it means exactly this: kids = underaged people. Which is the vast majority in TO. And you might also stop calling arrogant people here, at least that much. Not all the opposition you meet is due to arrogance...

 

I hope this will settle things between us, because you are not stupid, and many times you have a usefull perspective on things... just don't twist my words.

[fufususumumu1 240]

 

Dude, do me a favor: stop messing with me in relation to this topic. You purposely twist the meaning of my words.

What I proposed has only one disadvantage according to TO, and that is that Tanki would require LESS drugs to be played. PERIOD.

 

As for the term "kids" - a good example of twisting what I say - it means exactly this: kids = underaged people. Which is the vast majority in TO. And you might also stop calling arrogant people here, at least that much. Not all the opposition you meet is due to arrogance...

 

I hope this will settle things between us, because you are not stupid, and many times you have a usefull perspective on things... just don't twist my words.

 

just one thing i disagree with:

because you {didyouknowthat} are not stupid

no, just NO!

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

@RustyNail:

 

"

Unfortunately, I want the opposite of TO Administration. Less drugging time in battle. The answer to 234 is not this drug interaction but simply the increase of cooling period for each drug. No interactions, no restrictions, other than the initial increase of each drug's cooling period.

Thus, even a player used to 234, would have to spend a period (after using the drugs) without them. Did he use 234? Then for a certain amount of time he can use no drug at all. Did he use only one or two? Then for this amount of time he can't use again this one or these two drugs. Simple.

But kids don't think and they usually don't understand that, so the issue generally remains an issue of whether we play 234 or we play with "smart" cooldown... Pfff...."

 

"The answer to 234 is not this . .. "

 

And since you thought this way, I simply presented my thoughts behind it as to why this idea is opposed. Or as to why I opposed it.

Now I was expecting a reply to oppose the points that I had opposed. But oh well.

 

And what was included in my post was also WHY it would require Tanki Online less drugs to play.

 

As for the "kids," thing. I mistook it and thought you used it figuratively, when you used it literally. Lol. :lol: 

 

@Fufususumumu1: And there we go, another unsupported insult. Nice job calling me stupid when it was me who made you look stupid.

I'll surely be looking forward to what your next posts are. Though they are most predictable and utterly cliché. :P

[DoctorK 439]

Wow you guys have been here for a long time, considering I have been playing for over a year and I'm the top ran. Either that or you have alternate accounts. :P