best player on battle

[marvenking 26]

lol

[marvenking 26]

i wish tanki agree my idea

[marvenking 26]

....

[deadtoyou 2,502]

Just think of all the druggers who would abuse this....and the campers...and all the other annoying things people do.

[marvenking 26]

look u can kill drugger without druge+ dont forget druge dropped 2 on map+ the matter is skill not druggers,or leave battle join other+they need finsh game to take there prize even drugger u have team so who have skill he win

 

Thank you

[megaxd200 60]

This is a bad idea because what if someone is better then the other person and the other person have more score just cause he was using a other weapon or was using drugs and now staying he better then you just because of that so no i dont like his idea just saying

[deadtoyou 2,502]

This is a bad idea because what if someone is better then the other person and the other person have more score just cause he was using a other weapon or was using drugs and now staying he better then you just because of that so no i dont like his idea just saying

Does your keyboard have punctuation keys??  :blink:

[deadtoyou 2,502]

look u can kill drugger without druge+ dont forget druge dropped 2 on map+ the matter is skill not druggers,or leave battle join other+they need finsh game to take there prize even drugger u have team so who have skill he win

 

Thank you

I know that, but they would still get more kills, thus getting WAY more than everyone else. (they already get more than the others.)

[marvenking 26]

guys do u know whats mean team ???

[marvenking 26]

lets say u team red drugger team blue all team can kill 1 drugger -_-

[marvenking 26]

+ i said no matter drugger u can kill him by skill+ there druges dropped+winner team and who is higher then all of winner team he get prize :)

[kayitsiz 621]

lets say u team red drugger team blue all team can kill 1 drugger -_-

lol Their team members support it, and that takes too much effort which you don't have.

 

This is just possible with DM.

[marvenking 26]

yes agree but look on DM some shoot drugger and u can shoot him 2 and u may kill him :D

[deadtoyou 2,502]

yes agree but look on DM some shoot drugger and u can shoot him 2 and u may kill him :D

Yes, druggers can be teamed up on, but you get points depending on how much damage you dealt him in the last 10 seconds before he was killed.

 

The point system as it is is A-OK for me, no need to change it to make the better players get double the amount they earned, leaving almost nothing for everyone else.

[marvenking 26]

Yes, druggers can be teamed up on, but you get points depending on how much damage you dealt him in the last 10 seconds before he was killed.

 

The point system as it is is A-OK for me, no need to change it to make the better players get double the amount they earned, leaving almost nothing for everyone else.

no dude they not took it from fund they give it like gift -_-

[Promissory 569]

no dude they not took it from fund they give it like gift -_-

So I could go with my friend 1 v 1 , 2 mins battle, get a slightly better DL than him and get 1k in 2 mins?

 

I LOVE THIS IDEA!

[deadtoyou 2,502]

no dude they not took it from fund they give it like gift -_-

Yeah, this is something you need to work on.....

 

So I could go with my friend 1 v 1 , 2 mins battle, get a slightly better DL than him and get 1k in 2 mins?

 

I LOVE THIS IDEA!

LOL, I could buy Shaft M2 tonight.....

[the_blue 25]

1. Really easy to exploit, 1v1 really quick battle shouldnt end with 1000 crystals.

2. Alot of people would spend their time in battle trying to get kills instead of working as a team.

[deadtoyou 2,502]

1. Really easy to exploit, 1v1 really quick battle shouldnt end with 1000 crystals.

2. Alot of people would spend their time in battle trying to get kills instead of working as a team.

Look at this @marvenking, you need to re-think your idea.

[genak138 950]

dont comment if u dont like my idea

if you post a topic, you need to accept ALL feedback. not just what you want to hear. everybody gets a say in it. if you dont want to hear everyones opinion, maybe you shouldnt start topics

[liverpoolaum 811]

hey bro if u want to choose a tat he ist he best in wat criteria u ill choose it ill be diff & druggers ill hav better chance

[deadtoyou 2,502]

hey bro if u want to choose a tat he ist he best in wat criteria u ill choose it ill be diff & druggers ill hav better chance

Write in English please... :blink:  :wacko:  :blink:  :wacko:  :blink:

[chiddychiddy 6]

The player who has the most points should get a bonus only if he's on the losing team, this will stimulate the losing team to be better.

[genak138 950]

The player who has the most points should get a bonus only if he's on the losing team, this will stimulate the losing team to be better.

agreed

[deadtoyou 2,502]

The player who has the most points should get a bonus only if he's on the losing team, this will stimulate the losing team to be better.

No, because then players would mult in 1v1 battles and get tons of free points.