Smoky VS. Thunder

[Thekillerpenguin 1,731]

I like both, but I would prefer Smoky since it can be used in close quarters without damaging yourself, in addition to the great impact force (you can even deflect Vikings!) and damage. I also have great luck with it.

 

Thunder is great too, for crowd control and damage at longer ranges, but in most situations I'd prefer Smoky.

[deadtoyou 2,502]

I use M2 Thunder currently. It's a great weapon, but until I get M2 Smoky I can't really make a clear vote :)

Edited February 26, 2015 by deadtoyou

[Felenew 24]

why do you only compare m2's? You may make some players to stop buying thunder at high upgrades. But anyway I will say some reasons why thunder is better. First thunder with double power is already OP. Thunder m2 with double power can kill dictator m2 in two shots. Thunder can beat smoky when fighting 1vs1, unless the smoky deals the crit damage. Thunder m2 is unlocked very early at captain rank. Same for m3, it's unlocked at brigadier rank, and I am using thunder m3, and my team wins every time when I join the battle. So I am dominating. And now for smoky. Smoky is in way too much expensive at m2, which is one of disadvantages, smoky is mostly better than thunder because if its critical hit. But smoky is only good at m2 and m3. So I would say that, thunder at m0 and m1 is better than smoky at m0 and m1, and smoky at m2 and m3 is better than thunder at m2 and m3.

[dilsharox 2,395]

i like both turrets