This Rule Must Be In Tanki

[deadtoyou 2,502]

You are Saying Right & Wrong also. Because if wo5 Player Dont have any m2 then? i also had all m1 at wo5 . .. Wo3 to First Lieutenant must have m1 . Major to Major General Must have m2 .  and  General to Generalissimo Must have m3 

My graph is based on the fact that all M0s can be bought once you reach , all M1s can be bought once you reach , all M2s can be bought once you reach , and all M3s can be bought once you reach .

 

I also said that IF you don't have ANY M1/M2/M3, (depending on your rank,) then you can use the previous modification.

[Cor7y 13,862]

I agree with shehryar, even thought I like to dominate players with m1's

[AbsoluteZero 3,729]

I actually think this is not a bad idea, although it won't stop the problem of mults since you can easily be a mult with m2/m3 equipment. 

This is a great idea!

+1 from me.

I can't believe some players have voted it down.

Maybe these players are the problematic m0's

 

Mults on the other hand can be dealt with by the kick2 suggestion.

[Holy.Hero 402]

Got 1 More Sabotager , Pic in Spoiler . He Just Parkour . and i Think He is inactive player or his account is shared With So many peoples thats why he is m0 At Brigadier . and he just Playing For Time Pass . Not for fun . He just Parkour And Team Lost Because Of players like this 

 

 

 

 

[r_The_Curious_Guy0 22]

Got 1 More Sabotager , Pic in Spoiler . He Just Parkour . and i Think He is inactive player or his account is shared With So many peoples thats why he is m0 At Brigadier . and he just Playing For Time Pass . Not for fun . He just Parkour And Team Lost Because Of players like this 

 

 

so true. there are many on the loose.

[syed.m.abdullah 0]

i agree my bro and thnx to post this  :)

[hannan.1 4]

well this idea is bad...alot of players with m1's can defeat m2's and m3's using drugs....i myself play against m2's and m3's and i fight a good battle....and n0t only m0 and m1's cant be mult but even m3's also disturbs the battle...

[Holy.Hero 402]

well this idea is bad...alot of players with m1's can defeat m2's and m3's using drugs....i myself play against m2's and m3's and i fight a good battle....and n0t only m0 and m1's cant be mult but even m3's also disturbs the battle...

cant you Understand english or any other problem? i am Not saying that What are you Thinking -_- You said many m1s Defeat m2 clans -_- m1s They are according to their rank Wo4 cant m2 any gun so m1 is upgraded Gun for wo4 rank . and not always m1 defeat m2s some time accidently m1s win in real they cant win. m1 cant fight m3 and i am saying that at the m3 battle . brigadier rank players join with m0 So This rule Must be in game that Who is m0 Brigadier they cant Join m3 battles . 

[deadtoyou 2,502]

well this idea is bad...alot of players with m1's can defeat m2's and m3's using drugs....i myself play against m2's and m3's and i fight a good battle....and n0t only m0 and m1's cant be mult but even m3's also disturbs the battle...

M1s can only win against M2/M3 if they are hardcore drugging......-_-

[Holy.Hero 402]

M1s can only win against M2/M3 if they are hardcore drugging...... -_-

Yeah If m1 Drug They are Like M2 :P but m2 Cant Always Win From m3 :P m2 DDrugs Then They like m3 thats why they win :P  . m0/m1's at the Colonel or above rank they are just noob . or inactive player . i love tanki . They dont :P

[deadtoyou 2,502]

Yeah If m1 Drug They are Like M2 :P but m2 Cant Always Win From m3 :P m2 DDrugs Then They like m3 thats why they win :P  . m0/m1's at the Colonel or above rank they are just noob . or inactive player . i love tanki . They dont :P

I love proper English too......:P

[TheGrandDuckel 0]

Im suporting you bro ;)

[XaIdI_GT 46]

I agree and vote in favor.

[Nimtiz 7]

I disagree. This is because that would be assuming all people with M1/M0 gear are mults and are really bad. I have been destroyed multiple times by drugger M1's it wont change anything.

[Holy.Hero 402]

I disagree. This is because that would be assuming all people with M1/M0 gear are mults and are really bad. I have been destroyed multiple times by drugger M1's it wont change anything.

m1/m0 Dont Only Mult . They Waste Our team . We lost Because of them . If they leave the Battle then some m3 Players Can join And Both team Equal . and thats not fair if m1 wasting team & enemy have all m3 players . You disagree Because i think you are from them

[deadtoyou 2,502]

Have you taken into account the fact that most non-buyers usually end up at your rank with mostly M1s, maybe a few M2s?

 

Having this system in place FORCES you to buy, and makes players quit the game at that level.

[camo_scout 0]

yes

[TOXIC311 1]

I agree its not very useful to have mo equipment when your team needs help but i think at a high rank with M1 stuff is good but not very needed in a battle like that :mellow: 

[Thekillerpenguin 1,731]

There's really no excuse for having M0 equipment at those levels, but keep in mind that extremely skilled players can still use M1s with OK success at those ranks. M1 Railgun can still destroy unprotected M3 Hornets in 2 hits. M1 Shaft, with a few micro-upgrades, can destroy M3 Wasps in one hit and critically damage M3 Hornets. And I don't think I know anybody who would say no to a M1 Isida healing them.

 

Another inherent problem here is people playing with friends. If a Colonel wants to have a fair 1v1 with a friend and the only equipment they both have is a M1s, they can't play.

[QuakerOats 28]

What's the point of this idea again? I'm M1 and I've beat M2 players many time without much of a problem unless they're drugging.

[AbsoluteZero 3,729]

What's the point of this idea again? I'm M1 and I've beat M2 players many time without much of a problem unless they're drugging.

Good for you but if you have to ask what's the point then you've not read it properly. Go read it again or come back and like the idea when you have ranked up 10 levels when you finally realise why this suggestion needs to be implemented.

[Holy.Hero 402]

Have you taken into account the fact that most non-buyers usually end up at your rank with mostly M1s, maybe a few M2s?

 

Having this system in place FORCES you to buy, and makes players quit the game at that level.

i am Also Non-buyer . and i have mostly M2s And enough Crys to Buy m3

[Holy.Hero 402]

There's really no excuse for having M0 equipment at those levels, but keep in mind that extremely skilled players can still use M1s with OK success at those ranks. M1 Railgun can still destroy unprotected M3 Hornets in 2 hits. M1 Shaft, with a few micro-upgrades, can destroy M3 Wasps in one hit and critically damage M3 Hornets. And I don't think I know anybody who would say no to a M1 Isida healing them.

 

Another inherent problem here is people playing with friends. If a Colonel wants to have a fair 1v1 with a friend and the only equipment they both have is a M1s, they can't play.

yeah You are right :P But m0s and m1s . They all are not skilled . only some of them have good skillz . but mostly are noob . and if some one Wanna play with m1 Equipment . at higher ranks so  there must be a Option for them in Pro BAttle 

[Holy.Hero 402]

What's the point of this idea again? I'm M1 and I've beat M2 players many time without much of a problem unless they're drugging.

You Cant Understand the Point . Because At Your rank you Play m2 and m1 battle . And m1 Garage is normal for your rank . you are not noob . but m1 and m0s waste team when playing with m3's

[GODOFWAR15 95]

What happens when a person owning a m2 turret + m1 hull or m2hull + m1 turret what he would do then if u allow him same will happen and if u ain't allow where would he go coz ur thinking only about your rank players not other