Remove 'No' option from "Do you want to stay in Lobby?" in Battles option

[r_priyangshu0 271]

Hello, today I was playing a Noise CTF battle. I had accumulated a large number of points. When I wanted to change my equipment, I accidently clicked the Battles option. In my hurry I pressed the 'No' option and left the battle. I am very frustrated and annoyed by the 'No' option in the Battles menu. The menu loads fairly quickly so there is no need for the 'No' option. Thus, I kindly request the developers to remove ONLY the 'No' option from the Go to Battles menu button.

[DonCarnage 1,275]

Hazel-Rah Said: We have reasons to change interface this way. Yes, this is somewhat inconvenient for player who used to old interface, but new dialog will remain. We got a lot of problems with people not leaving battles and staying in garage or battle list while they are still take place in team list. This dialog makes it less of an issue. Thus, it will stay in the game. 

 

 

Next time, please create a topic in this section Ideas and Suggestions

[r_priyangshu0 271]

Yes I perfectly know what Hazel said, but I dont want them to remove the whole Dialog; just the 'No' button.

 

Also, Ideas and and Suggestions is not frequently read by anyone and most topics worth implementing become dead.

 

Also, please improve your English.

 

And please, stop acting like a Moderator. You have done it in many topics.

[r_priyangshu0 271]

And yes, I will request a Moderator to move this topic.

[I.WalkAlone 550]

I don't really see any point in removing only the 'No' option. What's the point in having only one choice to a question? That's as good as not having a choice in itself.

[beaku 2,661]

Also, please improve your English.

 

And please, stop acting like a Moderator. You have done it in many topics.

You are not good in English yourself, so you have no right to criticise others in this manner.

He is trying to help the moderators. There is nothing wrong in that. In fact, people like him are always welcomed by staff.

[r_priyangshu0 271]

I don't really see any point in removing only the 'No' option. What's the point in having only one choice to a question? That's as good as not having a choice in itself.

The 'No' option determines whether the player stays in the current battle or not. It is much more irritating than the 'Yes' button. The 'Yes' button,I believe, frankly shouldn't exist at all. You already have the option to do so.

[Link_1119 183]

This happend to me.

So fustrating.

[r_priyangshu0 271]

This happend to me.

So frustrating.

#DontLetTyposRuinReputation. :)

[I.WalkAlone 550]

The 'No' option determines whether the player stays in the current battle or not. It is much more irritating than the 'Yes' button. The 'Yes' button,I believe, frankly shouldn't exist at all. You already have the option to do so.

But don't you get how illogical it is? There is no point in the dialog box if there is going to be only one outcome. Why? Because the current dialog box has a choice between two outcomes (I'm ignoring the cancel option as it isn't relevant to the topic). If you remove one out of the only two outcomes in a choice, the supposed 'choice' becomes redundant. There is not point in the dialog box asking whether we want to stay in the battle or not if it is only possible to stay in the battle.

[r_priyangshu0 271]

But don't you get how illogical it is? There is no point in the dialog box if there is going to be only one outcome. Why? Because the current dialog box has a choice between two outcomes (I'm ignoring the cancel option as it isn't relevant to the topic). If you remove one out of the only two outcomes in a choice, the supposed 'choice' becomes redundant. There is no point in the dialog box asking whether we want to stay in the battle or not if it is only possible to stay in the battle.

Exactly. The dialog box is completely redundant. But since,Hazel won't change it back.I was trying to do something about it. Anyways, thanks for you opinion. My idea may be illogical, but the problem needs to be solved.

[r_priyangshu0 271]

Everyone, my idea is illogical, but the problem exists, so I was trying to do something about it. I will request a moderator to close this topic as it serves no purpose.

[beaku 2,661]

Exactly. The dialog box is completely redundant. But since,Hazel won't change it back.I was trying to do something about it. Anyways, thanks for you opinion. My idea may be illogical, but the problem needs to be solved.

You just need to get used to it.

If you are having problems now, imagine what will happen when unity version comes out. It will have a different user interface.

[r_priyangshu0 271]

You just need to get used to it.

If you are having problems now, imagine what will happen when unity version comes out. It will have a different user interface.

I am used to it, as it is the first time it has happened. I just wish they would do something about it.

[liverpoolaum 813]

Hazel-Rah Said: We have reasons to change interface this way. Yes, this is somewhat inconvenient for player who used to old interface, but new dialog will remain. We got a lot of problems with people not leaving battles and staying in garage or battle list while they are still take place in team list. This dialog makes it less of an issue. Thus, it will stay in the game. 

 

 

Next time, please creating a topic in this section Ideas and Suggestions

i suppose its already in english

[r_priyangshu0 271]

i suppose its already in english

 

Hazel-Rah Said: We have reasons to change interface this way. Yes, this is somewhat inconvenient for player who used to old interface, but new dialog will remain. We got a lot of problems with people not leaving battles and staying in garage or battle list while they are still take place in team list. This dialog makes it less of an issue. Thus, it will stay in the game. 

 

 

Next time, please creating a topic in this section Ideas and Suggestions

create.

[liverpoolaum 813]

create.

but i can see its in ideas and suggestions 

[r_priyangshu0 271]

but i can see its in ideas and suggestions

It was in General before.

 

PS'

 

 

:rolleyes: Facepalm :rolleyes:

 

 

[liverpoolaum 813]

It was in General before.

 

PS'

 

 

:rolleyes: Facepalm :rolleyes:

 

 

ohh

[beaku 2,661]

I am used to it, as it is the first time it has happened. I just wish they would do something about it.

Well then, as Hazel said, they won't do anything about it. So no use creating this topic.

[r_priyangshu0 271]

Well then, as Hazel said, they won't do anything about it. So no use creating this topic.

Which is why I said I would request a Mod to close this topic.

[lordmostafa 3,847]

Closed upon request.