CTF battles start as 1-1

[RustyNail 1,538]

Final score X-0 is very heavy on the losers' shoulders, from the fund aspect.

If battles start as 1-1 then even if one team doesn't get to capture a flag still they get some more funds and so it's not that bad.

This could lessen the cases that most of the team's members leave before the end.

 

What do you think?

 

 

[some observations relative to the matter; sometimes both teams are good but one of them lacks a good (effective) capturing sub-team, thus the battle ends with scores like 3-0, 2-0 or 5-0*. One can see that skill is ok for both teams, D/L ratio is similar, no mults or extreme power unbalance, just the inability to capture flags. In these cases it seems to me more fair for everybody to split funds in kinda balanced way. Of course, winners get more, but losers get some as well. At least, some more than what they get today.

I can assure you, even when I am in a winning team, a score of X-0 is not pleasant to me. After all, we all play a game, we are like a company of friends and there is no need to set extremely competitive standards. A good game is a good game and a game like the one I described deserves a better share of funds]

 

 

* I 'm not talking about slaughters like 10-0 and spawn killing, when one team eliminates the other and in the end the losing team has only 1 or 2 players left, but for a fair battle with two decent teams...

[Maf 32,333]

Why make the losers think they achieved something when they actually didn't? The losing team already gets at least 20% of the battle fund even if they scored absolutely nothing, and in my opinion that's already more than enough.

[lukey0 27,543]

^

Agree

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

^

Agree

[jazz20 1,181]

Why make the losers think they achieved something when they actually didn't? 

Lol this made me laugh :P

[dilsharox 2,395]

hmm.. so u want the fund shared 50-50 among the 2 teams?

[RustyNail 1,538]

Why make the losers think they achieved something when they actually didn't? The losing team already gets at least 20% of the battle fund even if they scored absolutely nothing, and in my opinion that's already more than enough.

Because when the battle is fair and D/L ratios similar - as I said, and didn't refered to teams that can't stand against the opponents -  then it's unfair to say that they didn't achieve anything just because they couldn't capture a flag.

But never mind, that was just a thought and different opinions are respected.

In fact, I don't think I have to add anything more, or comment again in this topic. Each one reads and thinks and makes their own mind about it.

[RustyNail 1,538]

hmm.. so u want the fund shared 50-50 among the 2 teams?

That's not what I said, I said maybe they could get some more than what they get today. If today they get 20%, I might propose a 30%.

But it's up to Tanki to decide how competitive the game should be. They can even decide to give everything to the top scorer of the winner team and nothing for all the others, no matter how hard they played and cinrtibuted to a good game.

It's a matter of basic values.

[dilsharox 2,395]

That's not what I said, I said maybe they could get some more than what they get today. If today they get 20%, I might propose a 30%.

But it's up to Tanki to decide how competitive the game should be. They can even decide to give everything to the top scorer of the winner team and nothing for all the others, no matter how hard they played and cinrtibuted to a good game.

It's a matter of basic values.

i think he fund is divided 60-40 among the 2 teams

[RustyNail 1,538]

@ dilsharox

 

Why make the losers think they achieved something when they actually didn't? The losing team already gets at least 20% of the battle fund even if they scored absolutely nothing, and in my opinion that's already more than enough.

[zainmandark 6]

Bad idea