Open testing of changes in balance!

[Mr.SV.ENS 738]

Nice i got all m3s so dont bother me )

[zigakovac 86]

lol me too. 

i already wasted all my crystals. how to earn/ get them?

i think something like that: /add cry 121223...

[zigakovac 86]

The time you can shot derives from "amount of energy" ( = 1000) and "comsumption (per second)" (= 200). See wiki.

burning time means the amount of time, the target continues to burn after you stopped shooting.

so, shooting time isnt diffrent at m0, m1...

[zigakovac 86]

5 seconds am i right?

[Rohrmeister 1,535]

so, shooting time isnt diffrent at m0, m1...

correct, it is 5 seconds. Unfortunately reload starts, after you stopped shoting (and not in parallel)

 

ps: little hint: If you want to add something to an older post of yours, you can edit it.

You don't have to make a new post for each and every thought ;)

[r_Soldier280 478]

Why cant we change? :C

[carsonrattray 2]

whats the problem keeps asking for invite code

[samlauncher 106]

garage doesnt exist anymore :mellow:

[danilo8667 234]

I go to garage: Server Connection Error - Reload

[Jboymark53 508]

Love it! rail M4 with Wasp M4. My dream come true!

[r_Soldier280 478]

Garage is eliminated :3

EDIT: Its on but we cant change :C

Edited April 21, 2015 by r_Soldier280

[danilo8667 234]

Devs, this problem with garage is on test server since testing the Hammer and you didn't fix it yet ?!.....

[Rohrmeister 1,535]

Titan an Mammuth are boring hulls on medium-to-large battlefields.

 

What would you guys think of changing Titan and Mammuth the other way around:

- keep them with slow turning and slow acceleration as before..

- and give them more top speed, which takes 2 seconds to build up

 

Idea behind:

- Mammuths and Titans can also cross Serpuchov Battlefields then, without the pilot falling asleep..

- But they are not agile turnable fighters, they are more like a fortress, where you have to use a good turret on top.

 

I would like this more, then the slow but agile hulls.

I think, then also more pilots would drive Mammuths.

 

What do you think?

 

(of course this only works if the freeze does not fix their turret for 10+ seconds.. which I already marked as too strong and too long. So forget about this detail, and tell me what you think about the Titan/MAmmuth proposal).

Edited April 21, 2015 by Rohrmeister

[samlauncher 106]

titan mammoth were never meant to be played in big maps imo, unless base camping, light hulls are better

[danilo8667 234]

Titan an Mammuth are boring hulls on medium-to-large battlefields.

 

What would you guys think of changing Titan and Mammuth the other way around:

- keep them with slow turning and slow acceleration as before..

- and give them more top speed, which takes 2 seconds to build up

 

Idea behind:

- Mammuths and Titans can also cross Serpuchov Battlefields then, without the pilot falling asleep..

- But they are not agile turnable fighters, they are more like a fortress, where you have to use a good turret on top.

 

I would like this more, then the slow but agile hulls.

I think, then also more pilots would drive Mammuths.

 

What do you think?

 

(of course this only works if the freeze does not fix their turret for 10+ seconds.. which I already marked as too strong and too long. So forget about this detail, and tell me what you think about the Titan/MAmmuth proposal).

You serious ?! This would make Mammoth best for capturing flags and with drugs, no one would be able to kill a Mammoth.Mammoth is good now as it is.

[danilo8667 234]

Can't test it.Waste of time.C'mon devs.Fix the garage problem.

[samlauncher 106]

i buy the pro pass in test, and then it says i cant enter pro/create pro as i dont have the pass.... :rolleyes:

[danilo8667 234]

i buy the pro pass in test, and then it says i cant enter pro/create pro as i dont have the pass.... :rolleyes:

Garage error, same happened to me...

[Warface_Player3 7]

+

[Rohrmeister 1,535]

You serious ?! This would make Mammoth best for capturing flags and with drugs, no one would be able to kill a Mammoth.Mammoth is good now as it is.

hmm.. this is a point. I next to never play battles with much drugs, therefor I did not consider this.

[Pathfinder 1,690]

In my opinion -

 

Railguns reload reduced by more than a whole second is a bit excessive.

 

Thunder has been nerfed right? Same damage rate but slower shooting rate and range? I think it's fine as it is!

[LeIouch_Vi_Britannia 6,163]

Nerf everything by something except just Rail, how much do you want to implement this thing to the players? :mellow:

[NewbieCake 3,067]

Nerf everything by something except just Rail, how much do you want to implement this thing to the players? :mellow:

Smoky is perfect for hunting down Railgunners.

[NewbieCake 3,067]

It seems Freeze and Railgun were the only turrets that got a buff. All the other turrets got a buff :/ :(

[Rohrmeister 1,535]

-deleted-

Edited April 21, 2015 by Rohrmeister