invalid Manual [Surrender] button for loosing team

[mtbarden3 68]

Cool idea, however, it wouldn't be very practical as far as you would have to require a high percentage of people voting (from both sides) to end it. As stated previously, what stops a clan or 5 or 6 joining a battle, starting to lose, and then ending quickly. 

 

I don't care if this is implemented in battles where no one else is present, however, we already have auto finish for this. 

[Maf 32,319]

Under review

[btpt] [ftr]

[donaldo9000 1,342]

Good idea, but the ratio should be much higher, because if all people in the winning team vote, and a few in the losing team because they are kind of done with it, the battle ends. Something like 85% would be better I think. However, sometimes there are gonna be noobs that don't know about it, and you'll still have to wait long.

[Amateur 829]

Good Idea!

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

You know how some players just hold the flag and start spawn killing your team when they only need 1 flag to end the battle? You want your funds but they simply don't capture and end the battle? This is where this option kicks in. 

 

In the Battle Chat you have to type in /Surrender1and then you automatically put in a "surrender vote". If you open up the tab menu, then the players who have surrendered have a White Flag Icon indicating that they surrender. If 70% of your team has surrendered then the battle would end in 10 seconds for the surrendering team to be able to change their decision after surrendering. If you have surrendered and then you want to change your mind then you open up the battle chat and type in /Surrender2 to take back your "surrender vote". You cannot surrender if your team isn't losing. The surrender option is only available in team battles. 

 

If a mult joins your battle and surrenders even if there is no need to surrender, it doesn't matter. If your team surrenders due to mults, you lost anyways. Your team already has enough mults so that no one is playing on your team and you would lose anyways. 

 

 

-----EDIT------   So don't come and complain to me that mults will surrender:

 

I'm gonna scream at the top of my lungs right now: If a few mults surrender... there will not be enough votes to actually do something. If your entire team is full of mults.... your team would lose anyway even if you didn't surrender since you only have like 1 or 2 players playing and 8 players snoozing with the protection of the pause key.

[lordmostafa 3,821]

Under review.

[btpt] [gmpl]

Duplicates:

• Early battle termination - manual [surrender] button for loosing team
• Need a Surrender Option for CTF!

As you can see from the second link^, Hazel closed it saying it was replaced by the early battle termination system, that's why this idea has very little chance of becoming real. However, your idea is not really the same as early battle termination, hence the "Under review" tag.

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

Duplicates:

• Early battle termination - manual [surrender] button for loosing team
• Need a Surrender Option for CTF!

As you can see from the second link^, Hazel closed it saying it was replaced by the early battle termination system, that's why this idea has very little chance of becoming real. However, your idea is not really the same as early battle termination, hence the "Under review" tag.

Early battle termination works but a lot of people join at 0:01 to keep the battle going or just to stop the players from getting the fund earlier. However, early battle termination only works if one team has only like 3 people left when the other team has 8+. If it's a let's say 5 on 5 and one team is absolutely destroying the other early in the battle you should be able to quickly end the battle. 

[Drey 879]

This is an amazing idea. This needs to be spread, but it would be hard for the Battle Moderators, with the "/vote" and now your Surrender Option.

[Sun.Strike 76]

Awesome but also bad on my Alternative account  love spawn killing. It`s a easy way for crystal and experience. HowEver Good Idea. And A tiny problem as the /repotnickname doesnt work so i dont think this will work. Also Once some 1 on the team surrenders there shouldn`t Let gold be dropped as the guy who surrendered is a mult

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

Awesome but also bad on my Alternative account  love spawn killing. It`s a easy way for crystal and experience. HowEver Good Idea. And A tiny problem as the /repotnickname doesnt work so i dont think this will work. Also Once some 1 on the team surrenders there shouldn`t Let gold be dropped as the guy who surrendered is a mult

Spawn killing is fun until the other team leaves... but the other team will try staying for as long as they can so they can get their funds. Also, being spawn killed is a totally different experience. If the other team's surrender count is on and then a gold drops, the gold will drop and then the battle ends. Throughout the gold time, you have the ability to un-surrender. 

[greatesttankbattle 22]

I like the idea of surrendering but the reason you'll do this is because of spawn killers. How about making a protective area that the enemies can't enter or shoot through allowing you to spawn safely. If they enter this area they self destruct, however you can't shoot out from this area and once you leave you can't go back in. But if you try to go back in you will not self destruct it'll act like a wall. Now this protective area will only be in team modes and spawns would have to change. 

 

Now tell me which map has the worst spawns? ( for me polygon) 

[DESTROYER_13 1,019]

And A tiny problem as the /repotnickname doesnt work so i dont think this will work. 

I am fairly sure a moderator said somewhere that it does work, it is just that there needs to be a large percentage of the team/s voting which is why you may not see anybody getting kicked/banned. 

[slycleaversmart 1,154]

Awesome but also bad on my Alternative account love spawn killing. It`s a easy way for crystal and experience. HowEver Good Idea. And A tiny problem as the /repotnickname doesnt work so i dont think this will work. Also Once some 1 on the team surrenders there shouldn`t Let gold be dropped as the guy who surrendered is a mult

.

 

 

Please spawn killing is not good for xp or cry its what many people do when there is a lack of other things to do in a game IE bad game. I am however entirely opposed to this idea it's bad and will only help kilts get more power over the outcome of a well played game.

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

 

 

.

 

 

Please spawn killing is not good for xp or cry its what many people do when there is a lack of other things to do in a game IE bad game. I am however entirely opposed to this idea it's bad and will only help mults get more power over the outcome of a well played game.

You shouldn't worry about mults surrendering in a well played game:

 

1. Mults, if any, take up about 2 people in a 10 person team. 

2. If so many mults are on your team that would potentially cause a surrender, your team would lose anyway since no one is playing and your entire team is full of mults.  <----- Probably would answer many concerns about mults. 

3. Your team would already be losing if so many mults were on your team. 

[VaudeVille 1,428]

Good idea though

[fordmustang12345 3,910]

Nah.id rather foght to the finish and maybe turn the tide of the battle.it doesnt happen often but it just might

[oOo.Aryan.oOo 968]

Why to surrender battles

If this option cames it will regarded as a update for mults tgey will just mult by surrender and making thier team lose .

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

I'm gonna scream at the top of my lungs right now: If a few mults surrender... there will not be enough votes to actually do something. If your entire team is full of mults.... your team would lose anyway even if you didn't surrender since you only have like 1 or 2 players playing and 8 players snoozing with the protection of the pause key.

[Sr.I3oSS 2,546]

What if 2 v 2 and one player surrenders because the opposite 2 players are his friends?

 

ANDDDDD big problem.

 

All will surrender when I join. Playing will be hard for me.

[Jack_Fehran 34]

Unbalanced idea, maybe a mod should come instead ending, sometimes, if you lossing, you can't just end it. While this idea mind me that while all your team post that shortcut, battle would end and opossite team would got score in total, like if it is 10 flags to end it, after giving up of lossing team, winning team get 10\10 capped. However think aboutbad ways of using this..

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

Unbalanced idea, maybe a mod should come instead ending, sometimes, if you lossing, you can't just end it. While this idea mind me that while all your team post that shortcut, battle would end and opossite team would got score in total, like if it is 10 flags to end it, after giving up of lossing team, winning team get 10\10 capped. However think aboutbad ways of using this..

bro u dont have enough experience on how many times people refuse to end a one hour battle when it's 39-0 and they still drug and spawn kill everyone on the losing team. 

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

What if 2 v 2 and one player surrenders because the opposite 2 players are his friends?

 

ANDDDDD big problem.

 

All will surrender when I join. Playing will be hard for me.

2 v 2? You both have to surrender(like I said in my first post "70% is needed") because if one person surrenders you will only get up to 50%. 

[TTK_229 1,080]

But I'm too good to lose a battle. xD

 

Edit: 200th post!!1!11!

[Hayno 14]

This would be great I would surrender for a while see tankers play and un serrender

[snipe3000 678]

Wait, If the winning team surrenders… Do they lose? if so, how much of the fund do they get?