Suggestion: Sitters for TO Account

[Zenyth 6,494]

Many of us have a lack of sufficient time to fully enjoy playing Tanki Online except for a handful of weekends. With "sitters" we will be able to assign 1 or a maximum of 2 other Tanki friends to play on our behalf in our account.

Features -

• If we are out of the game for a while, we will make up for the lost time by utilizing our friends' help to gain experience points or save up for those dream combinations in time for upcoming sales.
• Rank up in a faster way and achieve quick ranking to levels that suit our gameplay (helpful for alternate accounts or people who have a lot of in-game and/or outside friends on TO)
• Keep raking in crystals even when on vacation or busy days.
• Sitter's login will have our username, but the password will be of his account for safety.
• Sitter will be given invite by us similar to the friends system in TO.

What can a sitter do on our account?

(Options may be customized)

• Earn crystals and experience points by playing battles
• Cannot spend crystals
• Buy crystals on our account
• Change turrets, hulls and paints
• Cannot chat on the main server chat
• Can chat in battle
• Cannot use forum on our behalf
• [More to be added]

Please comment about your opinion on this idea and give us constructive criticism.

[Ekamjatts 7]

your idea can be applied but it needs a lot of improvements because you idea is not complete means if this update will happen then the problem may be doubled and there can be chances that a hacker or thief will get you acc. 

[T.O.R.N.A.D.O.XXX 184]

People might hack in your account so....

[drazeruzumaki 5,021]

ya right so why not basically give him ur acc?

who is so free to play on ur behalf :mellow:

even me a big no lifer dont like to play for my classmates....

[dilsharox 2,395]

hmm.. this would be ok if the person to whom your giving your acc is trustworthy 

[Zenyth 6,494]

But you can't get hacked if this thing is tweaked for safety stuff. Besides, it's invite-based..

[Phoenix.Rising 2,519]

Wait, this is like another suggestion for account sharing?

[Phoenix.Raised 5,992]

Wait, this is like another suggestion for account sharing?

Yes....and that is forbidden

[1XeroX1 13]

This is almost same as account sharing, so No.

[beaku 2,656]

I suggested something some time ago and it was rejected. This is equivalent to account sharing which isn't allowed in Tanki.

[Canadian_Eh 1,354]

Whats the point if your not the one playing? Don't you have pride in the account you built, yourself ? And who is going to build your skill? You can't become a high rank and play with recruit skills.  

 

 

None of this matters anyway, Tanki would never ever agree to this. There is no money in it.

[Tap_Dancer 1,360]

Get friends 2 play on your account?!  :blink:  :wacko:

You said they cant chat in the lobby but they can in battle. So what if he posts something like a fraud link in the chat and gets you permanently banned? Or if he starts using 3rd party software and gets you suspended?

[Zenyth 6,494]

Whats the point if your not the one playing? Don't you have pride in the account you built, yourself ? And who is going to build your skill? You can't become a high rank and play with recruit skills.  

 

 

None of this matters anyway, Tanki would never ever agree to this. There is no money in it.

I said its specially for alts, but okay.

 

Get friends 2 play on your account?!  :blink:  :wacko:

You said they cant chat in the lobby but they can in battle. So what if he posts something like a fraud link in the chat and gets you permanently banned? Or if he starts using 3rd party software and gets you suspended?

Only trustworthy friends.

[Phoenix.Raised 5,992]

I said its specially for alts, but okay.

 

Only trustworthy friends.

Do you know what is rule 2.2.2.?

[projectkronos 24]

Why would I spend MY time to rank up YOUR account?

[i200000 717]

Hhhh what about no :)

[Maf 32,328]

Account exchange, transfer or sharing is against the rules, so even though this would be a useful thing to have, there is no chance for it to be added as it breaks the very definite game rule 2.2.2.

 

Idea invalid. Closed.