Mults

[arun24 6]

Tanki, please make a system where the server tracks a players activity in battle. If they are on "Pause" the whole time, and if they are not doing anything to benefit their team in team battles then why should they they have such advantages like taking a gold box or being able to use the chat? The chat now adays is full of spam and flooding. No need to make it worse from inactive players.

 

Just 20 minutes ago, i was an Island CTF match... My team was winning, but there were two mults... 

1.  was going on pause from time to time... This left my team with one player less, and everytime he did that the other team would have the option of coming into our base and camping. There was not much i could do since the other team had an isida that was healing them from a distance. This player made sure he came back before the timer stopped and the last time he did it in that match was when the Gold Box fell. You have no idea how irritated i was that he got it because the Gold Box was in between two houses, and his heavy Viking wasnt budging. For starters he was multing, and he was just waiting for the Gold Box.

 

He was in the battle before me, both of the players on my team were. They were both multing, one just on pause, and the other using M1 turrets for no reason. I knew he had M2 Firebird and Freeze, since he used them when i joined but then he started using M1's to kill steal from me. 

 

My suggestion is that Mults, players on pause and players who have a score thats not really increasing slowly, like 20 points every 5 minutes should not be able to Capture a Gold Box. They should also not be able to use the Chat because of the fact that they will start complaining about how it was theirs and how the person who took it was noob.

 

-I would have recorded a video but basically it was me against 3 people since both of my teammates were mults, it would have dropped my frame rate by 20, and i didnt really need that.

[arun24 6]

Why is  name not registering...

[arun24 6]

OMG 

[arun24 6]

can someone please post this name: Seddik-Hooligans as a member, the damn forum wont register it 

[arun24 6]

This is really getting me annoyed................

[Taco 2,820]

Instead of not letting them take a gold box, why not just automatically kick them directly from the battle?

[Dark-Rim 183]

This offense is not ban worthy with the proof you have. You need to record a video and besides, this is not the place to report mults. The correct place is the gameplay violators section of the forum. As for the suggestion, Its a pretty bad idea as people who go on pause for real will be hindered, and some people who may not be good at the game or are simply having a bad battle will also be hindered.

[arun24 6]

Instead of not letting them take a gold box, why not just automatically kick them directly from the battle?

I believe the kick system was taken out 2 years ago... the one that let you vote players using the thumbs down button. 

 

This offense is not ban worthy with the proof you have. You need to record a video and besides, this is not the place to report mults. The correct place is the gameplay violators section of the forum. As for the suggestion, Its a pretty bad idea as people who go on pause for real will be hindered.

Im not reporting anyone, im merely using it as a body...

[Dark-Rim 183]

^ I know, that's why I included my thoughts on the suggestion.

[Taco 2,820]

I believe the kick system was taken out 2 years ago... the one that let you vote players using the thumbs down button. 

I am not recommending them to implement this feature again, but to put more thought and thoroughly compose something that will be game changing.

 

The reason why that feature was removed is that if for example 5 players didn't like 1 player and wanted their friend to join instead, they could use the kick feature to get rid of that player even though they are playing well.

[arun24 6]

I am not recommending them to implement this feature again, but to put more thought and thoroughly compose something that will be game changing.

 

The reason why that feature was removed is that if for example 5 players didn't like 1 player and wanted their friend to join instead, they could use the kick feature to get rid of that player even though they are playing well.

Tanki claims to be working on a new system... I hear this since last year in June. Its been a year now, i think they are ignoring this subject.

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

Should've tried using the ./vote option.

But then again that command only works 0.0000001% of the time.

 

Tanki really needs to start working on stopping mults.

I guess next time I'll join my friend's enemy's team with my M0 Hammer and Hornet M0.

I LOOOVE HAMMER. IT'S SO OP. I USE HAMMER. I LOOOOVE HAMMER. send me friend invite? axaxaxaaxaa

[Taco 2,820]

Tanki claims to be working on a new system... I hear this since last year in June. Its been a year now, i think they are ignoring this subject.

This honestly doesn't surprise me.

 

Look at daily missions, in one V-LOG they said 2 weeks they will be rolled out, and they were not rolled out for over a month after that.

[Maf 32,305]

Removal of inactive players has been suggested multiple times before, so it's best to post new suggestions regarding such a system in the existing topics, such as Kick2.

 

Your idea will not be implemented, because punishment for inactivity in battle needs to be effective for all players. Not everyone cares about gold boxes or likes to talk in chat, so limitations for those two things will not affect them. And in case you are referring to actual game "mults" (accounts owned by a player in the opposite team, put into your team and left to take up the slot), then such a punishment will have absolutely no effect on them.

 

Idea rejected. Closed.