Tanki should remove kits.

[BSG-62 512]

Kits should only be available to people who could buy the equipment themselves if it wasn't in a kit. What i mean is if i want to buy equipment that can be bought at 2nd Lieutenant, i have to wait until 2nd Lieutenant to buy the kit.

[r_Soldier280 478]

Got 3 kits in my alt @0MN1V01D, so far...

 

 

Bulldog kit-M0 Hammer.M0 Hornet,= 200 maybe :/

 

Keeper kit-M1 Smoky, And M1 Titan= 11k maybe..

 

Fujiyama kit- M1 Vulcan,M1 Hunter, Sakura = 59k i think

 

Yes they're Poor Kits lol.

[AnduinFX 8]

What does making Tanki paid have to do with removing product kits? 

Exactly. Stick to the topic of lamenting how product kits ruin gameplay.

 

I understand how you feel. Regardless of where you are in the TO ladder, someone with a broken kit is gonna jump out of nowhere and ruin your day. Firefly at Seargeant, Predator at First Seargeant (I can't remember; forgive me if I get the unlocking ranks wrong), etc. These kits are unlocked at such an early level that, when bought on the spot after they've been unlocked, gives them an unfair advantage over other players.

 

I don't object to product kits; they're a nice way to get the things that you want for a lower price. But I object to the kits that give you better items prematurely. Kits like Predator, which gives you Thunder M1 at First Seargeant. The M1 upgrade for Thunder is at WO4. (BTW, Thunder M1 deals 20 more damage than M0 on average) It's obvious that skill and strategy can overcome that, but It's still annoying. The whole solution can be solved if game development tweaked the ranks at which kits unlocked, so players can't gain too large of an advantage over others through this bittersweet feature.

[opidude 437]

yea... dont do it. if tanki is going to be a pay - to - play game. tanki will probably have only about 1k ppl playing and it will shut down