★ Tanki Online Wiki Hub ★

[Mikaelson 664]

also, shouldn't the last sentence be "the developers plan to add more, for all turrets and hulls, in the future" ..?

because they have already planned to do it. it's not like they will only start to plan to do it in the future.

Hey,

 

I think what it says makes total sense;

“In the future, the developers plan to add more for all turrets and hulls.”

 

The developers plan to ADD them into the game, in the foreseeable future. Meaning, XT skins are planned to be released into the game in the future by the developers. It doesn't say whether making XT skins for all turrets and hulls is planned or not. Since the sentence already tells us that the developers are planning to release the skins into the game, it should make sense to the average person that the making of the skins is already planned thus “In the future, the developers plan to add more for all turrets and hulls.”

[soviet.reunion 40]

Hey,

 

I think what it says makes total sense;

“In the future, the developers plan to add more for all turrets and hulls.”

 

The developers plan to ADD them into the game, in the foreseeable future. Meaning, XT skins are planned to be released into the game in the future by the developers. It doesn't say whether making XT skins for all turrets and hulls is planned or not. Since the sentence already tells us that the developers are planning to release the skins into the game, it should make sense to the average person that the making of the skins is already planned thus “In the future, the developers plan to add more for all turrets and hulls.”

"plan" is already future tense. if you add "in the future" before it, that would mean that the plan hasn't started yet but will in the future. that's why you have to add "in the future" after "plan" and use "in the future" as an indiction of a later time instead of another future tense.

[Stratosphere 2,234]

the first drone kit is called "drone attack"

Fixed.

 

 

 

 

This is what was added:

 

 

 

 

 

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

oh come on.. you know I'm only so rude here because i feel that it should be up to you to proof read the wiki yourselves? you shouldn't need a troll to do it for you.. that's why I'm rude, cause i want you to see the problem.

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

what the hell.. this is not how you spell it..




This is how it's spelled in the game.. -_-

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

oh come on.. you know I'm only so rude here because i feel that it should be up to you to proof read the wiki yourselves? you shouldn't need a troll to do it for you.. that's why I'm rude, cause i want you to see the problem.

If you are indicating the DCC there, it is fixed now :) 

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

If you are indicating the DCC there, it is fixed now :)

have you gotten your answer as to how come some of the paint prices arein usd while others are in euros?

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

have you gotten your answer as to how come some of the paint prices arein usd while others are in euros?

I Replied already, didn't you see ?  :huh:

The prices given for paints are under development, which will undergo changes for a certain period of time. Thank you.

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

I Replied already, didn't you see ?  :huh:

oh, i didn't but i saw now..

 

..but that was 10 days ago..

Edited August 27, 2018 by GuidoFawkes

[BlackWasp777 4,498]

I recently looked at the Vulcan page to read the latest stats, and I found something that must be very confusing for newbies:

• There is this line with the 5 pictures of vulcan (M0, M1, M2, M3 and M3 XT)
• and right below is the table with stats that tells the players that there are obviously 5 types of Vulcan out there (M0, M1, M2, M3 and M3+)

So it's pretty easy to link the M3+ stats to the M3 XT picture.. which seems to be an obvious conclusion, but a wrong one.

 

I have no better layout to propose to you at my hands, but maybe someone else is more creative then me when it comes to page layouts. I think the problem arises only from the fact that the XT is depicted in the same line as the other M levels. It matches the table so great this way..

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

 

Fixed by adding a clarification, thanks for reporting ;)

Vulcan

[Tani_S 736]

 

 

Could you please verify the description on Thunder's splash mechanic:

 

 

Is "maximum damage radius" true here or shouldn't it rather be "average splash damage radius" (because I think it would contradict the description of the parameter "Max damage radius") ? If it's true, I'd be curious about the explanations.

 

 

I think it needs to be corrected. Please have a look.

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

I think it needs to be corrected. Please have a look.

Forwarded it. BTW, here is my explanation (just my thought on thunder)

 

There are three divisions of distance for thunder irrespective of modifications.

Max splash damage radius = 1m (maximum splash damage irrespective of no.of.tanks within the area)

Average splash damage radius = 5m

Min splash damage radius = 12m (after it no splash will affect a tank)

 

Average percentage of dealing average splash damage = 90%

So, in your query, it indicates the average splash damage dealt when the tank is only 1m away (or even nearer) from projectile

It means thunder has 90% chance of dealing average splash damage within 1m mark, rest of the time, it deals full damage (10%)

This is me so far using thunder all day. Hope you understood ;)

 

 

 

or so I am told xD

 

 

[Tani_S 736]

Thanks for the response and for forwarding it  :)

Yes, I get from the description that it will only deal 90 % of the damage (not a 90 % chance) within a 1 m radius. So let's say 880 is Thunder's average M4 damage -> so on average it would deal 792 (90% of it) there, when going after the description. But now I think it will deal on average 880 at 1m distance and 792 on the 5 m radius (the latter point seems to picture a non-linear damage curve).

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

Thanks for the response and for forwarding it  :)

Yes, I get from the description that it will only deal 90 % of the damage (not a 90 % chance) within a 1 m radius. So let's say 880 is Thunder's average M4 damage -> so on average it would deal 792 (90% of it) there, when going after the description. But now I think it will deal on average 880 at 1m distance and 792 on the 5 m radius (the latter point seems to picture a non-linear damage curve).

You got the point ;) me too hehe

[iMoneyMaker 4,500]

Wiki Team doing a great Job! Proud of all of them, Hexeyy Thundyyy Staratyyy Chaosyy   :wub:

Also you should update this! :)

 

 

 

 

Mzay resigned. and ZzeRoRo is a new Candidate! :D

Edited August 28, 2018 by iMoneyMaker

[Stratosphere 2,234]

 

Also you should update this! :)

Done.

• Creative League

Wiki Team Doing a good Job!

 

Thank you very much. :)

[Pyre 3,485]

@lukey0 actually noticed this, not me, but on the page about the Forum it states that the Beginner group can only post in News and announcements, but now they can post in the Beginner's Zone as well.

[Stratosphere 2,234]

@lukey0 actually noticed this, not me, but on the page about the Forum it states that the Beginner group can only post in News and announcements, but now they can post in the Beginner's Zone as well.

Done, also added a little more information on these forum groups.

 

Thanks for reporting. :)

Edited August 29, 2018 by Stratosphere

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

Wiki Team doing a great Job! Proud of all of them, Hexeyy Thundyyy Staratyyy Chaosyy :wub:

Thanks for these nice words :D

Gives additional motivation for us to slice potatoes for hex work ;) !!

Edited August 29, 2018 by thunderousrailgunner

[iMoneyMaker 4,500]

Thanks for these nice words :D

Gives additional motivation for us to slice potatoes for hex work ;) !!

I'm glad im giving motivation :) You deserve, well all helpers do! I got a lot of motivation when I was a helper on Social Media! :P

[kaisdf 3,320]

A few smol things:

• For railgun, "reload time" and "charge time" are pretty confusing. Wouldn't it be better for reload time to be the time between firing and being ready to fire again, and then charge time to be time between shots or the 1.1 second "charging" time.
• http://prntscr.com/komwkt - " A ready-to-fire"
• For the interesting facts section, maybe update it with the XT skins update, and add that Rail M3 XT had a white beam.
• https://en.tankiwiki.com/Turrets - Add XT turrets (and maybe hulls to their respective page if this hasn't already been done)

[Toby 2,938]

 

• For railgun, "reload time" and "charge time" are pretty confusing. Wouldn't it be better for reload time to be the time between firing and being ready to fire again, and then charge time to be time between shots or the 1.1 second "charging" time.

 

In case you didn't know, there's a 'Table of Characteristics' spoiler on each respective turret and hull Wiki page.

 

 

• http://prntscr.com/komwkt - " A ready-to-fire"

 

That's the official in-game description, thus we won't change it.

 

 

• https://en.tankiwiki.com/Turrets - Add XT turrets (and maybe hulls to their respective page if this hasn't already been done)

 

https://en.tankiwiki.com/Turrets#XT_Turrets / https://en.tankiwiki.com/Hulls#XT_Hulls ..

[kaisdf 3,320]

In case you didn't know, there's a 'Table of Characteristics' spoiler on each respective turret and hull Wiki page. 

 

That's the official in-game description, thus we won't change it. 

 

https://en.tankiwiki.com/Turrets#XT_Turrets / https://en.tankiwiki.com/Hulls#XT_Hulls ..

I know, I read that, and still constantly got confused when reading the table for some calculations I was doing.

 

Fair enough.

 

Apologies, I meant the new XT turrets and hulls: smoky and titan

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

why does it say that dictator has fairly poor acceleration speed? it has the highest power of all 7 hulls and according to the table of charestics power is what affects the time it takes for a tank to reach it's maximum speed...