Cricketers' Corner

[marc.jp_44 20,837]

When World cup 2015 was being held in australia , your situation was for me but in the afternoon where all matches would be finished before even finishing the school .

But we saw Ind vs aus semi-final .. we got down the bus .. fastly ran to the nearby tea- shop .. only to see after that india was losing  :mellow:

Where are you from?

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

Where are you from?

India .. 

[l.Eat.My.BuIIets 483]

5 or 7:30?

5 PM for me and Showstopper. We are in Saudi Arabia lol, though we are Indians.

[marc.jp_44 20,837]

India ..

 

Ohh, but you support Australia?

---

Aussies going well! Khawaja off to a flyer! P.S: 1:16 AM for me atm.

---

Can we please get a Like on the front page please, guys?

[l.Eat.My.BuIIets 483]

Ohh, but you support Australia?

---

Aussies going well! Khawaja off to a flyer! P.S: 1:16 AM for me atm.

---

Can we please get a Like on the front page please, guys?

Liked, just because Bae joined k.

[l.Eat.My.BuIIets 483]

Australia might win this thing I guess.

[drazeruzumaki 5,021]

India loses 95%

[l.Eat.My.BuIIets 483]

India loses 95%

95.5*

[l.Eat.My.BuIIets 483]

Which site are you guys using to watch the match ? I'm using crictime, but it lags.

[marc.jp_44 20,837]

Which site are you guys using to watch the match ? I'm using crictime, but it lags.

Smartcric is good. I can see it from my normal TV though, Ano and Kyle knows what I mean, it comes on a regular basic channel for us. I also have an Indian set top box that allows me to see Start Sports HD.

---

Imagine trying to categorise Yuvi's bowling style; left arm orthodox/medium straight crap that doesn't spin at all. That's how I'd define it.

Edited March 27, 2016 by Marc

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

Ohh, but you support Australia?

No .. I like only clarke from that side .. nw hes left ... i am always an indian fan :)

 

India should win , all i want is a revenge to aussies for the semi-final loss in WC15 

 

P.S - Sorry marc :P

[drazeruzumaki 5,021]

Which site are you guys using to watch the match ? I'm using crictime, but it lags.

I prefer hotstar. Its about 1 over delayed but it doesn't lag at all!

But i got TV so Star sports HD :PH34R:

[Aihab1 573]

India loses 95%

95.5*

......

Super Kohli!! India in semi finals ^_^. Well played everyone!  

[l.Eat.My.BuIIets 483]

GG India. GG.

Better luck next time marc

[mynameisdaniel_2015 144]

DAMMIT BANGLADESH :o  :o

IF U DIDN"T LOSE AUSSIES WOULD BE IN THE SEMIS (the india game, i mean)

DAMMIT KOHLI

STOP BEING SO GOOD

Edited March 27, 2016 by mynameisdaniel_2015

[marc.jp_44 20,837]

^+

---

I reckon we lost due to horrible selections; Tye and Hastings. NEITHER got a match or over to play, wth? They're such good bowlers, Tye has 9 different slower balls and no one knows how to play him bc he's new, even Kohli struggled against him is Australia. Kohli couldn't get under his slower balls, he was the only one who Kohli struggled to play, giving him a slight psychological edge. Think about it, replace Coulter-Nile with Tye and replace Faulkner for Hastings and BAM - we'd have won. Because Hastings would bat at Faulkners position, Faulkner could barely keep a 100 strike rate whilst Hastings thrives off pace, he'd have slogged us to a win probably, those few runs would've mattered. Kohli isn't familiar with neither Hastings nor Tye, imagine they bowled at the death, replacing Coulter-Nile & Faulkner's horrible 2.1 overs between them. And selections lost Aussies the match. Also, we shouldn't have caught Yuvraj Singh, great catch but they should've kept him in. Special mentions must go to Nevill - batted like a legend in those 2 balls he faced, those 2 balls were Faulkner's full total. You can't make a run-a-ball 10 in those crucial overs, horrible batting. It all boils to those moments and selections. Edited March 28, 2016 by Marc

[drazeruzumaki 5,021]

I went to sleep at 9 pm yesterday and didn't watch the match. Although my grandpa came shouting India won, i thought he was joking but.... Whoa, gonna watch the highlights damn it O_o

[Rayyan 3,415]

Marc bhai chop padgayi

 

Sorry Marc, GG India!!!!!!

[Anonono 1,233]

DAMMIT BANGLADESH :o  :o

IF U DIDN"T LOSE AUSSIES WOULD BE IN THE SEMIS (the india game, i mean)

DAMMIT KOHLI

STOP BEING SO GOOD

We have a true die-hard fan here everybody!

 

Don't worry, I'm disappointed that we lost too. But why are you complaining to Bangladesh rather than Australia?

[marc.jp_44 20,837]

We have a true die-hard fan here everybody!

 

Don't worry, I'm disappointed that we lost too. But why are you complaining to Bangladesh rather than Australia?

Don't worry, he's my friend (irl) and Co-Leader. In our PM he said that Coulter-Nile and Faulkner bowled horribly, which led to our defeat.

[TriNitroToIuene 4,765]

^+

---

I reckon we lost due to horrible selections; Tye and Hastings. NEITHER got a match or over to play, wth? They're such good bowlers, Tye has 9 different slower balls and no one knows how to play him bc he's new, even Kohli struggled against him is Australia. Kohli couldn't get under his slower balls, he was the only one who Kohli struggled to play, giving him a slight psychological edge. Think about it, replace Coulter-Nile with Tye and replace Faulkner for Hastings and BAM - we'd have won. Because Hastings would bat at Faulkners position, Faulkner could barely keep a 100 strike rate whilst Hastings thrives off pace, he'd have slogged us to a win probably, those few runs would've mattered. Kohli isn't familiar with neither Hastings nor Tye, imagine they bowled at the death, replacing Coulter-Nile & Faulkner's horrible 2.1 overs between them. And selections lost Aussies the match. Also, we shouldn't have caught Yuvraj Singh, great catch but they should've kept him in. Special mentions must go to Nevill - batted like a legend in those 2 balls he faced, those 2 balls were Faulkner's full total. You can't make a run-a-ball 10 in those crucial overs, horrible batting. It all boils to those moments and selections.

Let's admit Faulkner is a better death bowler than Hastings, with his slower balls, cutters, and yorkers, he's like the Bumrah of India. Also, his form is currently dipping, but that's no reason to kick him off the team, everyone knows what he can do in his heyday.

 

But the way Khawaja batted, tho, I thought Australia had a comfortable 200+ score :O Credit to Nehra for removing him.

 

As for the second innings, it's history :P

[marc.jp_44 20,837]

New Article! :D

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=310374&p=5402881

[marc.jp_44 20,837]

Let's admit Faulkner is a better death bowler than Hastings, with his slower balls, cutters, and yorkers, he's like the Bumrah of India. Also, his form is currently dipping, but that's no reason to kick him off the team, everyone knows what he can do in his heyday.

 

But the way Khawaja batted, tho, I thought Australia had a comfortable 200+ score :o Credit to Nehra for removing him.

 

As for the second innings, it's history :P

Yes, Faulkner is a good death bowler and he did bowl brilliantly against Pakistan but this is India, not Pakistan, India has faced Faulkner so much now, they know his game and his leg cutter out the back of the hand can be read easily (trust me, Daniel and I like to use the leg cutter a lot against each other but we've seen it so much that we can always pick it). Tye and Hastings haven't played India often, India doesn't know how they bowl. Remember how Kohli couldn't play Tye? Also, you actually haven't seen Hastings in his heyday, he's superb at the death. In the BBL, you should've seen his spell with Boland, in their 4 overs, they hit the yorker 24/24 times, it was fantastic, Darren Sammy couldn't touch them. Hastings doesn't have slower balls that are as good as Faulkner but he hits his yorkers and his yorkers are really good. Ano would know the spell I'm taking about. And yeah, Nehra is my favourite Indian bowler atm because he's really good, his yorkers are great. Khwaja batted well, yes.

li couldn't play Tye? Also, you actually haven't seen Hastings in his heyday, he's superb at the death. In the BBL, you should've seen his spell with Boland, in their 4 overs, they hit the yorker 24/24 times, it was fantastic, Darren Sammy couldn't touch them. Hastings doesn't have slower balls that are as good as Faulkner but he hits his yorkers and his yorkers are really good. Ano would know the spell I'm taking about. And yeah, Nehra is my favourite Indian bowler atm because he's really good, his yorkers are great. Khwaja

[asifmehmood 1,576]

Australia  noobies ki tarah khailay India ny Australia ko rait kheliay 

Translations: Australia lost against noobies and India hardly won

[asifmehmood 1,576]

Let's admit Faulkner is a better death bowler than Hastings, with his slower balls, cutters, and yorkers, he's like the Bumrah of India. Also, his form is currently dipping, but that's no reason to kick him off the team, everyone knows what he can do in his heyday.

 

But the way Khawaja batted, tho, I thought Australia had a comfortable 200+ score :o Credit to Nehra for removing him.

 

As for the second innings, it's history :P

comparing Bumrah and fualkner :P  every one know India have worst Fast bowlers