Tanki World Records

[r_Mia1 8,513]

One battle is one battle in some map.

You had two battles in the same map.

 

I ONCE AGAIN am saying that I'm not talking about friend made or regular battles. I know you played regular battle, I can see that. What I'm saying is you played in two different battles (doesn't matter if on the same map) and that's not what I will accept in the future.

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

One battle is one battle in the same map.

I had 2 rounds in the same battle.

 

I played two different rounds in the same battle.

 

It was (in one battle). It never mentionned I could not take Golds in different rounds.

Edited February 21, 2016 by a7x_Pedro48

[Maf 32,302]

And from now on, it will be in ONE SINGLE BATTLE, not two.

This is simply a record for how quickly the player can take gold boxes. For the sake of less false submissions we say that it needs to be on the same map, but theoretically, the ONLY criteria for this record is that the battle cannot be set-up, where players let the record-setter take the golds. As seen from the record for 5 gold boxes, this has always been the case and it should remain that way. I see no reason to reject records where golds were taken in consecutive rounds, because what we're counting here is time needed to take gold boxes - not number of golds in a single round.

 

I am completely with Pedro on this one. There is simply no logic behind limiting the record to one round only.

[opidude 437]

Guys I made new world record

Most kills in one minute

Previously: 17 Kills

New record: 18 Kills

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-pawcK4Djg&feature=youtu.be 

is this valid?

[Cor7y 13,862]

is this valid?

No, because your friends helped you.

Also considered power levelling. :ph34r:

Edited February 21, 2016 by Cor7y

[r_Mia1 8,513]

I am completely with Pedro on this one. There is simply no logic behind limiting the record to one round only.

If you say so. Accept record that opidude player posted. Because there simply nowhere says that kills should be in a regular battle. We can't refuse it now because it's our fault that we weren't more specific about it. Right? :) :) Will you update it, please?

[opidude 437]

yaaaay :D

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

If you say so. Accept record that opidude player posted. Because there simply nowhere says that kills should be in a regular battle. We can't refuse it now because it's our fault that we weren't more specific about it. Right? :) :) Will you update it, please?

Wow, you are being so sarcastic, what is the problem with my record? You never said anything about the other records being on 2 rounds. But, out of the blue, today, you're doing this for my record...

 

There was no rule at the beginning. Then some players made private battles to own some records. Some adjustments had to be made. That may be what created the confusion. But it never was crearly said that only records in one round were accepted.

 

Btw, you can see that the record of Opidude is a set up. All tanks with green paints and not attacking him. Even if there is no rule, the "judges" of this topic can see this is planned. And I saw a lot of record rejected by Ilia or someone else because it was not valid.

 

My record is legit... :/

Edited February 22, 2016 by a7x_Pedro48

[r_Mia1 8,513]

Look... I absolutely have nothing against anyone of you setting any new record. What I hate is the fact that nothing on this topic is explained. I was always a judge here, but I never judged so much, just to help Ilia when he was absent. Now that I got the part of the topic, I spend more time on it and to me it seems like nothing is clear, many records are weird and unfair.

 

I know the record that Opidude posted here is all set up. But where on the entire topic do you see anything that says that set up records will be rejected? Nowhere, that's right. Same applies to your record. It's nowhere said that it could be in two or more battles. So if we can accept your record, then we can accept his too.

 

And I'm saying this in public just so you all know that such unexplained records will be accepted only until the document with full explanation about every record is made. I will be working on it, hopefully together with Ilia and Mafioso (since 4th judge is never here) and I will let you know about it as soon as it is done. That's all from me for now.

Edited February 22, 2016 by r_Mia1

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

But where on the entire topic do you see anything that says that set up records will be rejected?

There are 297 pages lol. You read all? I already saw some debates about set up records. That's why someone put (in one battle) in the first message. And I didn't say that all set up record were rejected. Biggest multi kill was a set up and it was valid.

 

As for my record, it was nowhere said that it can only be done in one round.

 

You can make a new record for the fastest time to take some Golds in one battle. But there is already a similar record (Most gold boxes taken in one battle - 9 - dlharry89).

 

For Homie's, Lukey's or me record, it's about the fastest time. I don't understand why this is such a big deal.

 

If you want to accept Opi's record, it's your topic after all, you are the judges.

[yoyo360_GTO 265]

I disagree with the most golds caught in 1 day record. The winner of the most golds caught on Halloween caught 162 which is significantly higher than 45.

[yoyo360_GTO 265]

It was on the same day :0

Edited February 22, 2016 by yoyo360_GTO

[yoyo360_GTO 265]

Though shout outs to contra for having caught 45. I only caught 10 on that day :(

Edited February 22, 2016 by yoyo360_GTO

[Maf 32,302]

For Homie's, Lukey's or me record, it's about the fastest time. I don't understand why this is such a big deal.

^

 

 

 

I disagree with the most golds caught in 1 day record. The winner of the most golds caught on Halloween caught 162 which is significantly higher than 45.

Record is added only if the record holder applies by himself.

[lukey0 27,543]

Wow, some debate that just happened. ._.

 

^ We all know the 162 Golds was a set-up. ^^

[r_Mia1 8,513]

There are 297 pages lol. You read all? I already saw some debates about set up records. That's why someone put (in one battle) in the first message. And I didn't say that all set up record were rejected. Biggest multi kill was a set up and it was valid.

 

As for my record, it was nowhere said that it can only be done in one round.

No, I didn't. But did you? Will everyone have to read all pages to get to know the answer about their record? :) That's why I mentioned document with rules ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE.

 

All set up... who cares? It's record. If we count every record (in battles, in one battle, set up, not set up...), we would have over 200 of them now. 

 

I disagree with the most golds caught in 1 day record. The winner of the most golds caught on Halloween caught 162 which is significantly higher than 45.

When there are 10x funds, it's easy to set such record. It is in archive just because 10x funds don't happen every day.

 

Mia, those aren't two battles.

That is one battle and 2 ROUNDS. Jeez, don't you know the difference? .-.

Two different battles/matches/rounds on the same map. I don't see what wrong I said?

[Maf 32,302]

Two different battles/matches/rounds on the same map. I don't see what wrong I said?

Well, we need to be clear about the terminology here to avoid confusion.

 

Map = battle arena on which rounds are played

Battle = a site created by a player, which has certain settings and its own web link

Match = a number of rounds in a certain battle that determine an overall winner. This applies only to eSports tournaments.]

Round = one single game in a battle, such as a standard 15 minute game.

 

At least that's how I interpret these words.

[r_Mia1 8,513]

Well, we need to be clear about the terminology here to avoid confusion.

You know well what I meant by saying two different battles. I'm not native English and I don't really know the exact meaning of each and every word but I did explain myself well.

[Maf 32,302]

You know well what I meant by saying two different battles. 

Well there's the thing - if I knew what you meant, then this whole argument would have never started, which is why I pointed out what the words above mean for me, so that you could either agree to use the above meanings or suggest your own. And English isn't my first language either, so that's not a valid excuse ;)

[r_Mia1 8,513]

Well there's the thing - if I knew what you meant, then this whole argument would have never started, which is why I pointed out what the words above mean for me, so that you could either agree to use the above meanings or suggest your own. And English isn't my first language either, so that's not a valid excuse ;)

Two different battles on the same map (one after another)... Yep, my explanation was hell hard to understand.

Anyway, I'm done with discussion here, once rules are finished, there will be nothing else but fair records. :)

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

I'm not english either. It's better to use the word "round" instead of "battle", it's easy for everyone to understand. Like a boxing match. A battle of two boxers. And there are a few rounds.

 

Anyway, there will be nothing else but fair records, in the case of the fastest time to take 3, 4, 5 golds, I don't see how Homie's record or my is unfair because we took Golds in two rounds.

 

 

 

No, I didn't. But did you? Will everyone have to read all pages to get to know the answer about their record? :) That's why I mentioned document with rules ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE.

Never said I did. But I already saw some debates about set up battles, that's all.
 

 

All set up... who cares? It's record. If we count every record (in battles, in one battle, set up, not set up...), we would have over 200 of them now.

 
I don't care lol, never said I did care about set up record for kills or whatever. But I saw a judge saying that set up record for gold are prohibited now.
 
As for "in one battle", it's a nonsense yes. Fastest time to take 4 or 5 golds can be done in 2 rounds, or 1. I don't see the problem with this. I don't see why taking 3 Golds in 4 minutes in the same round is more legit than taking 3 Golds in 4 minutes in 2 rounds. It's all about the fastest time.

Edited February 22, 2016 by a7x_Pedro48

[opidude 437]

So... someone change da record to mine pls :3 

[Maf 32,302]

So... someone change da record to mine pls :3 

We're still debating that one. Since the way you did it is precisely how power-levelling is done, it means I have to check with admins first about whether it's OK to accept and display such a record, since it kind of promotes violation of game rules.

[Guest]

Individual Records

 

Highest exp/time ratio with a turret - 3655 (Twins) - @W.R.E.C.K.E.D

Profile — BarbaFenner89

• Thunder M3 — 4670,19 ratio
• Isida M2 — 4498 ratio
• Twins M2 — 4481,68 ratio
• Hammer M2 — 3824,38 ratio

[r_Mia1 8,513]

Profile — BarbaFenner89

• Thunder M3 — 4670,19 ratio