Tanki World Records

[Drazox 665]

SUPRA HOT FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Nolo 366]

Wey there!

 

I am curious about knowing who currently are the oldest active players on Tanki Online.

I have searched around the forum for somebody who had a list of like top 10-20 oldest tankmen still logging in, but all I could come up with is this Tanki World Records with @Oufa holding the top title.

 

Perhaps is there anyone with some knowledge or idea regarding this topic who could possibly satisfy my curiosity?

Thank chu in advance!  :P

[BRO0088 1,724]

Who has the record for the longest hour played with holiday paint?

[Nolo 366]

[...] I am curious about knowing who currently are the oldest active players on Tanki Online. [...]

Okkey dokkey never mind I'm dumb! I can sort of figure that out on my own by just investigating through the Forum Members List... lel!  :P

It is settled now take care y'all!

[Total_Drama07 309]

Who has the record for the longest hour played with holiday paint?

Too specific for a record. 

[BRO0088 1,724]

Too specific for a record. 

why?

[Total_Drama07 309]

why?

Otherwise people will want a record for every paint available. 

[Maf 32,300]

why?

Because if we add that, we're gonna have to add 100 new records for "longest hours spent with _____ paint", for every paint that's in the game. Also, using a specific paint all the time isn't something interesting or challenging.

[AbsoluteAlphaZero 2,027]

Just do it for holiday paint. Everybody has that paint and it is very interesting in my opinion ;)

[AbsoluteAlphaZero 2,027]

Highest Profile K/D?    http://prntscr.com/evpb00

(I know this isnt the highest, I had a K/D of almost 3000 on a profile before. But I thinkI'm the only one who posted this.)

[AbsoluteAlphaZero 2,027]

BTW it may sound stupid but is a high or a low rating better?

Highest rating? (NVM didn't saw it was 94k)- http://prntscr.com/evps9q |

 

Edited April 12, 2017 by AbsoluteAlphaZero

[Total_Drama07 309]

Highest Profile K/D?    http://prntscr.com/evpb00

 

(I know this isnt the highest, I had a K/D of almost 3000 on a profile before. But I thinkI'm the only one who posted this.)

The highest profile K/D is around 3600 on the second page.

 

BTW it may sound stupid but is a high or a low rating better?

 

Highest rating? (NVM didn't saw it was 94k)- http://prntscr.com/evps9q |

 

 

A higher rating it better. The record it 94k.

[Cortana 4,601]

I would really like to have my record for the highest fund without kills/score back.

 

[opidude 437]

Longest Jump?

Members:  opidude, Security

Can you put both of our names? Thanks :3

Edited April 13, 2017 by opidude

[Nolo 366]

I would really like to have my record for the highest fund without kills/score back.

 

 

 

Sorry if this might sound skeptical and rude...

But, on my personal opinion, this feels like it could be easily staged. And anyway it does not seem to require much skill at all to achieve such record, just good timing and/or staging.  -_-

[Cortana 4,601]

Sorry if this might sound skeptical and rude...

But, on my personal opinion, this feels like it could be easily staged. And anyway it does not seem to require much skill at all to achieve such record, just good timing and/or staging.  -_-

I'm not quite sure I understand what you said, could you explain in Layman terms, please?

[Nolo 366]

I'm not quite sure I understand what you said, could you explain in Layman terms, please?

Lel! My bad!  :P

Let me use a possible case to explain myself:

Our tankman Cookie decides to set the new record for "highest battle fund without kills/score back."

Cookie creates a pro-battle with friends: deathmatch, 999 for time limit.

Cookie and his friends play throughout the battle until it has almost reached its limit.

Cookie exits and rejoins to reset his leaderboard stats.

Cookie's friends leave the battle.

Cookie takes a screenshot of a leaderboard with no kills and deaths and an extreme battle fund.

 

Now I am not saying that I believe that you have staged your battle. No totally, you could have just been lucky!

But then do you see my point? It turns out to be more a result of luck rather than of skills.  :huh:

[Maf 32,300]

Let me use a possible case to explain myself:

Yeah, this is a very good point - the record is too easy to stage. In fact, staging it is pretty much the only way to beat it. I think we should just remove it completely.

[Cortana 4,601]

Lel! My bad!  :P

Let me use a possible case to explain myself:

 

 

 

 

Our tankman Cookie decides to set the new record for "highest battle fund without kills/score back."

Cookie creates a pro-battle with friends: deathmatch, 999 for time limit.

Cookie and his friends play throughout the battle until it has almost reached its limit.

Cookie exits and rejoins to reset his leaderboard stats.

Cookie's friends leave the battle.

Cookie takes a screenshot of a leaderboard with no kills and deaths and an extreme battle fund.

---

It turns out to be more a result of luck rather than of skills.  :huh:

Yes, that is precisely what happened.

---

So are you trying to say that luck based records should be removed? Also, I have other screenshots where I got a large fund with no kills/ score. Will that count?

I don't know how to prove it to you that they were legit random battles, but I played on big maps.

[Nolo 366]

[...] So are you trying to say that luck based records should be removed? Also, I have other screenshots where I got a large fund with no kills/ score. Will that count?

I don't know how to prove it to you that they were legit random battles, but I played on big maps.

Should luck based records be removed?

Sincerely I believe I have little to no involvement in this decision, as I have not created this topic, not contributed to this section nor hold any listed record. I was just sharing my opinion.  ^_^

[Cortana 4,601]

I have not contributed to this section

That is certainly not true. Edited April 13, 2017 by Cortana

[Maf 32,300]

So are you trying to say that luck based records should be removed? 

Well, I like to compare all records in TWR to records in GWR and by that logic - yes, luck-based records should be removed.

[Nolo 366]

That is certainly not true.

Oh well, if it comes down to having contributed in getting a record being removed... you got me on this one!  ^_^

 

 

And I who initially misread and thought @Cortana was proposing a new TWR.  :mellow:

 

[marc.jp_44 20,837]

I really like this new guy.

[opidude 437]

Longest Jump?

 

 

Members:  opidude, Security

Can you put both of our names? Thanks :3

?