Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Tanki World Records


Maf
 Share

Recommended Posts

I thought it was decided that records with limits are valid until that limit is reached?

Kinda, but I'm thinking of maybe not doing that? For instance this limit will never be reached, it's highly unlikely for the forum to only have one member online. And just having a random unbeatable record of 3 set is... well... random. No?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Staff don't count either, so flae wins :3

The players that disagreed with that post (other than one of them) are.....interesting.

 

And just having a random unbeatable record of 3 set is... well... random. No?

Unbeatable? I can see two members happening being possible (Though right after a forum update would be most likely to get there) Also, there will never be only 1 player in battles or in servers. (There will often be 0, however)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, "random" is my all-encompassing word for pointless, out of place, irrelevant, useless and other similar words.

IIRC, random can't be contextually used like that. But w/e.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda, but I'm thinking of maybe not doing that? For instance this limit will never be reached, it's highly unlikely for the forum to only have one member online. And just having a random unbeatable record of 3 set is... well... random. No?

Hmm... I see what you mean. If you consider there to be little point including records with limits on such a basis, then I will support that decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...