If we lost in 1v4, do we deserve more crystals?

[ToiletPaperRoll 1,318]

 

In cases such as this, in my opinion we deserve more crystals. Game should even see are your teammates working, and not just calculate fund by score. I think i deserve more crystals than vs0204, because i was killing all these players alone. Please leave your opinion here.

[Phoenix.Raised 5,992]

Well no, since red team won. Its logical that the wining team (in this case red) gets the greater part of the fund.

[ToiletPaperRoll 1,318]

Moderator if you see this message, please delete one of my topics. Somehow it shown error not sent, but actually 2 topics appeared.

[ToiletPaperRoll 1,318]

Well no, since red team won. Its logical that the wining team (in this case red) gets the greater part of the fund.

but my team was doing nothing, and i had more score than best in red team. I think i deserve same amount of crystals as best player

[tony990_Superstar 68]

Losing team should get more crystals anyway...not as much as the winning team but it seems ridiculous that someone with 1,000 points in a battle gets 100 crystals. That's why there are so many one-sided battles that are like yours, 6v3. Nobody wants to play on the losing team, all it means is you get less crystals. That's why if your team is losing people are going to quit and go to a winning battle. To be honest, I would too. It's a good strategy.

[Maf 32,300]

but my team was doing nothing, and i had more score than best in red team. I think i deserve same amount of crystals as best player

It's a team game, so the fact that you had most score and were doing all the work doesn't change the fact that your team lost. The losing team already gets up to 40% of the total fund and no less than 20% (even if you have 0 points/flags), so you don't deserve any more than this. If you don't like depending on your team and don't want to lose because of bad teammates - play DM.

[Phoenix.Rising 2,519]

It's a team game, so the fact that you had most score and were doing all the work doesn't change the fact that your team lost. The losing team already gets up to 40% of the total fund and no less than 20% (even if you have 0 points/flags), so you don't deserve any more than this. If you don't like depending on your team and don't want to lose because of bad teammates - play DM.

But how would you deal with people teaming up over there? 

[Maf 32,300]

But how would you deal with people teaming up over there? 

By implementing my idea  :ph34r:

[donaldo9000 1,342]

By implementing my idea  :ph34r:

Savage

[orbanbotond 407]

I think it is fair because they are better and they deserve more, because then something right! But nobody Monti to stay on the map and it continues to be the team's fault.

[ToiletPaperRoll 1,318]

I think it is fair because they are better and they deserve more, because then something right! But nobody Monti to stay on the map and it continues to be the team's fault.

so you are telling me its fait that titans and mamooths kill me, wasp and get more crystasls in 1v4? not fair

[orbanbotond 407]

You must first leave the map! so much. ;)  :D 

[Total_SkiIl 1,983]

so you are telling me its fait that titans and mamooths kill me, wasp and get more crystasls in 1v4? not fair

I have been in situations where I am Smoky + Wasp and my team is total noob, and I carry those noobs in a 10v10 or so battle to victory. Plus, if you were playing Noise with Wasp then you must be jking that your team deserved all Crys from fund. Back in old days, as I have heard from old players' losing team most of the time got 0 Crys. So, its fair now and you should have tried to take and cap the flag instead of camping and.making your score up in hopes of more Crys.

[applications 993]

but my team was doing nothing, and i had more score than best in red team. I think i deserve same amount of crystals as best player

So with this logic a player playing 1v20 will get all the fund even though he lost because he tried? New form of powerleveling crystles up

[SpeedyRailgun 183]

when i still owned dage, i was in a polygon cp 2vs8 and we both holded point and lost 99:100 at the end. We both had enourmous ammounts of score but we got less crystals than top player in enemy team..

Kinda unfair.

Edited July 15, 2016 by SpeedyRailgun

[SpeedyRailgun 183]

So with this logic a player playing 1v20 will get all the fund even though he lost because he tried? New form of powerleveling crystles up

no he wont get more. Battle must be active and if this loser has good score, more kills than deaths and better score then enemy top player then why not?

[The-Operator219 1,929]

If your team was entirely deserted, why did you stay?

It would have been obvious you would go unrewarded, so I don't see what your expectation was.

[fordmustang12345 3,910]

Tbh.couldnt that pic be used to get the mults banned?

[Reckoning 178]

Tanki has already came with an update regarding fair share of crystals
I think it is fine in its present state. you are getting crystals according to your score not how may opponents you are facing alone.
i think its already fair.

[SpeedyRailgun 183]

If your team was entirely deserted, why did you stay?

It would have been obvious you would go unrewarded, so I don't see what your expectation was.

Well maybe there, when we were 2 vs 8 and we lost by 1 score and got almost nothing when our team did much better job than enemy team. if we count there would be 2v2 then we would win 100% but 4 players on 1 of us is too much to get nothing.

Why i didnt ran away like you do? Well i dont like to run away when i have sarted/joined something.

Ofc there are noobs who thinks 12 vs 1 is pro move if they are more in team than enemy.

Tanki has already came with an update regarding fair share of crystals

I think it is fine in its present state. you are getting crystals according to your score not how may opponents you are facing alone.

i think its already fair.

No they havent.

[Total_SkiIl 1,983]

Well maybe there, when we were 2 vs 8 and we lost by 1 score and got almost nothing when our team did much better job than enemy team. if we count there would be 2v2 then we would win 100% but 4 players on 1 of us is too much to get nothing.

Why i didnt ran away like you do? Well i dont like to run away when i have sarted/joined something.

Ofc there are noobs who thinks 12 vs 1 is pro move if they are more in team than enemy.

No they havent.

ik, dage you are a real older player. But, don't you yourself know that in past if team lost by just 2 or so flags, they got almost nothing?

[ToiletPaperRoll 1,318]

Tbh.couldnt that pic be used to get the mults banned?

didnt think about that... but theres no proof so no

[The-Operator219 1,929]

Well maybe there, when we were 2 vs 8 and we lost by 1 score and got almost nothing when our team did much better job than enemy team. if we count there would be 2v2 then we would win 100% but 4 players on 1 of us is too much to get nothing.

Why i didnt ran away like you do? Well i dont like to run away when i have sarted/joined something.

Ofc there are noobs who thinks 12 vs 1 is pro move if they are more in team than enemy.

How very valiant.  <_<

[SpeedyRailgun 183]

ik, dage you are a real older player. But, don't you yourself know that in past if team lost by just 2 or so flags, they got almost nothing?

and they still do get nothing!

 

im not saying when 10v10 battles. but im talking about those 5-10 battles.

[DESTROYER_13 1,019]

The losing team already gets up to 40% of the total fund and no less than 20% (even if you have 0 points/flags), so you don't deserve any more than this. 

If it is 1v10 and you get 10 xp, whereas the opponents have thousands of xp, and the game ends, will you get 20% of the battle fund?