declined Add M1 option in XP/BP formats

[asdasemm 925]

XP, BP, XP/BP formats got certain conditions like the modification must be M2 or M3

My idea is why not we make it in such a way that even M1s can take part in it... 

 

 

 

When creating an XP/BP format, there shall arrive an option called (M1, M2, M3) and not the ranks

 

 

 

---

 

Idea in simple way

---

 

M3-M2 xp/bp

M2-M1 xp/bp

M1-M0 xp/bp

Ofc the weaker modification will have a better option like applying protection!

 

So, there won't be any difficulty for mid-rankers to battle in such formats!

[Maf 32,300]

Under review

[fmtb]

[F1ASC0 1,705]

I agree. But M1 vs M3 is unfair.

 

Maybe it will be better if its M1-M2 XP/B battles.

[Hex 11,520]

No, M1 vs M3 is only unfair because of speed and turning radius. M1s with 40% are two shots. But yeah, if its M1-M2 XP/BP then it can work, but again, turning radius and speed can be a problem.

[Total_SkiIl 1,983]

No, M1 vs M3 is only unfair because of speed and turning radius. M1s with 40% are two shots. But yeah, if its M1-M2 XP/BP then it can work, but again, turning radius and speed can be a problem.

I defeated a M2 XP on my player account, and turning speed and all wasn't a problem even when I had M0 Rail!

[donaldo9000 1,342]

I defeated a M2 XP on my player account, and turning speed and all wasn't a problem even when I had M0 Rail!

Well it might have not been a problem with you, but in general, M1 vs M3 exp is unfair. 

-Rotation speed(Railgun)

-Reload time(Railgun)

-Speed(Hornet)

-Delay time(Railgun)

-Turning speed(Hornet)

[kmpa 830]

Well it might have not been a problem with you, but in general, M1 vs M3 exp is unfair. 

-Rotation speed(Railgun)

-Reload time(Railgun)

-Speed(Hornet)

-Delay time(Railgun)

-Turning speed(Hornet)

the same can be said for m2 vs m3

[emrakul 7,801]

M3's with M2's
M2's with M1's

M1's with M0's

Lower modification always gets some protection.

Good idea, I often see "xp" battles on EN3,4 and often ruined.

[donaldo9000 1,342]

the same can be said for m2 vs m3

Yes. M3 vs M2 is already unfair, imagine M3 vs M1.

[bobby-bonga 2,008]

Unfair but i still like the idea

[asifmehmood 1,576]

+1

[McArMy 43]

I dont like the idea.

[eminem9870 605]

So, you want this update for yourself. Just get m2 rail like the rest of the starting xp players -_-

[eminem9870 605]

However, if it was m1, I would thik it would be better to exclude m2 hornets and m1 rails. Just have m1 hornets and m1 rails vs m0 m0+ paints

[BLASTER872 1,892]

M3's with M2's

M2's with M1's

M1's with M0's

Lower modification always gets some protection.

Good idea, I often see "xp" battles on EN3,4 and often ruined.

+1

[DESTROYER_13 1,019]

XP <3

 

But I won't be playing it for a long long time.

[DageLV 940]

No, M1 vs M3 is only unfair because of speed and turning radius. M1s with 40% are two shots. But yeah, if its M1-M2 XP/BP then it can work, but again, turning radius and speed can be a problem.

yeah and the only problem is...

Get protection module in WO3 ranks with 40% protection.

[Mr.Ace 1,116]

Im Already "Sick" of noob M2 Mults , m1 seriously???

[Mr.Ace 1,116]

yeah and the only problem is...

Get protection module in WO3 ranks with 40% protection.

Thats not really a problem Hornet m2 railgun m2 can enter in XP/BP battles without protection they get 20% in battle now

[VaudeVille 1,428]

M3's with M2's

M2's with M1's

M1's with M0's

Lower modification always gets some protection.

Good idea, I often see "xp" battles on EN3,4 and often ruined.

Good idea! +1, do implement it!

I'd like to add more to this. Since in XP/BP most players have equal equipment, you don't really need a rank restriction. Why not allow a generalissimo to play m0/m1 xp/bp if s/he doesn't have them m2s yet? warrant officers can be allowed to play gissmos if they both are using m1s and MUs are off.

[Mister.Sister 3,574]

M3's with M2's

M2's with M1's

M1's with M0's

Lower modification always gets some protection.

Good idea, I often see "xp" battles on EN3,4 and often ruined.

+1

[Jack_Fehran 34]

And who will join, some kids who run into wall and flip himself while jumping of the edge? Isn't XP/BP there for Professionals who can play enough good to get at least M2 or M3? It's like you are giving 4-5 years old children drive  adult's bike.  <_<

[SUP3R_ST4R 1,205]

Well if you ahve m1 and you feel its unfair to play against m3's then join a battle with less rank or there might be a option 

[Supernatural 2,053]

m1 vs m3 would be totally unfair in the same battle, not only because of turret and hull differences but experience. An m1 stands no chance against an m3, unless it's an alt of a professional player. The only solution would be m1+m2 and m2+m3 battles. But the main problem is still the experience difference with XP/BP.

[BlueDragon_tamki 3,204]

m1 vs m3 would be totally unfair in the same battle, not only because of turret and hull differences but experience. An m1 stands no chance against an m3, unless it's an alt of a professional player. The only solution would be m1+m2 and m2+m3 battles. But the main problem is still the experience difference with XP/BP.

exactly