Preventing M3s at Extremely Low Ranks

[austin112233 117]

I like using my 50/50 m2 rail and m2 hornet in low rank battles because i can dominate. It is meant to reward buyers like me. Check my garage!

[asifmak 467]

Oh yes but for that much money you could buy enough drugs to last that long...

Buyers buy both to have double advantage(mues and drugs).

Its like icing on the cake.

[GeeVuh 1,647]

I like using my 50/50 m2 rail and m2 hornet in low rank battles because i can dominate. It is meant to reward buyers like me. Check my garage!

The point of this topic is to get rid of people like you, not to promote how "professional" you are.

[r_I_already_won0 2,339]

Buyers buy both to have double advantage(mues and drugs).

Its like icing on the cake.

I've no problem with MUs and buyers. In fact I would even support giving only 20 MU slots to players for something non-M3, then make the last 30 unlock for real money.....If they can make enough money (they're clearly pretty bad at business) to FIX the DRUGS SYSTEM.

[r_I_already_won0 2,339]

I like using my 50/50 m2 rail and m2 hornet in low rank battles because i can dominate. It is meant to reward buyers like me. Check my garage!

Cool. :) Some people at your rank have M4 thunder..... :ph34r: Good luck in-game!

 

EDIT: I played a Fort Knox battle 2 v 2 and someone on the other team had M3 rail and M3 hornet. A definite and marked advantage, yes, but they deserve that for their monetary contribution. :)

 

What gets me is a free repair to full health, 4 seconds of invincibility, and a complete re-set of the freeze effect. <_<

Edited December 21, 2016 by r_I_already_won0

[asifmak 467]

I've no problem with MUs and buyers. In fact I would even support giving only 20 MU slots to players for something non-M3, then make the last 30 unlock for real money.....If they can make enough money (they're clearly pretty bad at business) to FIX the DRUGS SYSTEM.

As u suggested previously the concept of restricted mu slots for a particular rank is perfect.

But i m 100% sure its not going to be implemented sooner or later.

[GeeVuh 1,647]

As u suggested previously the concept of restricted mu slots for a particular rank is perfect.

But i m 100% sure its not going to be implemented sooner or later.

Pff. Gross. I don't want that dang MU limit. Blegh.

[Banter 68]

While it is true that it's players' own fault if they don't manage their accounts well and a smart player like @GeeVuh can micro upgrade his turret to a certain level, but a player that buys many crystals can fully micro upgrade a complete combo, or two, or even three (perhaps a kit combo they purchased well before the required rank). That is where the big gap forms. Of course players should get something in return for the money they spend, because why else would they even spend money? But I do understand where players are coming from when they complain about micro upgrades giving a huge advantage. 

Totally agree with you. I have a buyer friend who, at 2nd Lieutenant, looked at Man O War kit and decided "I want that kit now!"

 

Immediately mued his Thunder and Hornet to M3 -_-

 

Probably caused a few Warrant Officers to rage quit the game when he repeatedly 1 shot their M0 Hornets.