Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Changes in the battle creation system


theFiringHand
 Share

Recommended Posts

it would be better if we had a Dev or Mr Debono himself answer our questions , we can read what he posted .. but its best coming from one of them .. sorry i'm only speaking what i want ...

Please check the first few pages. He has already answered most of the questions you're asking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it would be better if we had a Dev  or Mr Debono himself answer our questions , we can read what he posted .. but its best coming from one of them .. sorry i'm only speaking what i want ...

I wish Hazel-Rah was here, the only thing is that he's a bit arrogant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In retrospect, hardcore druggers will prefer to play in PRO battles with Smart Cool down turned off. Also, I think if everything goes correctly, players like us will find it more profitable to play PRO battles (Format or No supplies).

But at my WO3 account (it's good to have different accounts for different perspectives), there're plenty of druggers and usually only a few PRO pass battles. Even if it's reduced to what, 2.3k crys, it'll be still expensive for these low-rankers. The druggers won't have anyone to play with if they try to create no-SCD battles, no one will joined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But at my WO3 account (it's good to have different accounts for different perspectives), there're plenty of druggers and usually only a few PRO pass battles. Even if it's reduced to what, 2.3k crys, it'll be still expensive for these low-rankers. The druggers won't have anyone to play with if they try to create no-SCD battles, no one will joined.

That's a valid apprehension, to be honest. We can only wait to see if reduction in prices has been effective or not. If not, then perhaps they could further reduce the prices and make it a geometric progression rather than an arithmetic one.
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please check the first few pages. He has already answered most of the questions you're asking.

sorry my Glasses are dirty i can't seem to read what u say

 

I wish Hazel-Rah was here, the only thing is that he's a bit arrogant.

well for me i would rather someone else seeing he refuses to answer my questions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a valid apprehension, to be honest. We can only wait to see if reduction in prices has been effective or not. If not, then perhaps they could further reduce the prices and make it a geometric progression rather than an arithmetic one.

Yes- the ratio of xp to rank is a geometric progression, why not the rate of crystal increase for PRO passes? :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

xTzg9Aa.png?2

 

Yeah, I don't exactly think he's online.

he is not on line but he reads all these post on his i pod or other .. due to many times in the past i have seen my post answered with in a few minutes after posting on the weekends .. so i know he is reading them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:, no... He's given quite a clear picture and I'm mostly just repeating what he's already said (which wouldn't be necessary if everyone just read and think -_-). If there's anything which requires his reply, he'll surely give it.

You know, when two persons are reading the same thing, same book or same Forum post, they don't have the same conclusion and same impressions. Theoretically they can, but it's very rare.

 

But they certainly should not be compelled to accept one opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he is not on line but he reads all these post on his i pod or other .. due to many times in the past i have seen my post answered with in a few minutes after posting on the weekends .. so i know he is reading them

Hmph. Maybe, but I don't think we're getting more answers except from beaku (no disrespect intended) unless Hazel decides to come on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, when two persons are reading the same thing, same book or same Forum post, they don't have the same conclusion and same impressions. Theoretically they can, but it's very rare.

 

But they certainly should not be compelled to accept one opinion.

agreed

 

Hmph. Maybe, but I don't think we're getting more answers except from beaku (no disrespect intended) unless Hazel decides to come on.

true and when someone who thinks they know what the dev's plans are is not the same as a dev who created this update would know first hand knowledge of what is in store for the future of the game.. its like giving someone a cake recipe to do when they have never baked ever in there life but does know some things in the kitchen

Edited by frozen_heart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so if i'm correct

 

the battle system now creates random maps which can be cp, ctf, dm, tdm(ough no one likes tdm)

and players with pro passes can now just create the same battles as before?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I read a lot of hate against this update but I don't think it's as bad as many of you think.

Here's a suggestion for this update:

Introduce map filters too so that players can play on maps that they want to.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so if i'm correct

 

the battle system now creates random maps which can be cp, ctf, dm, tdm(ough no one likes tdm)

and players with pro passes can now just create the same battles as before?

Yeah, or the battle system can put you in an existing battle, and PRO passes enable everything they do now, except you can create battles. Normal players without PRO can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm I think all battles on tanki are made by players right ? if players need pro pass now, does that mean that all battles will be in pro mode only ?

No, the Battle button will now create maps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I read a lot of hate against this update but I don't think it's as bad as many of you think.

Here's a suggestion for this update:

Introduce map filters too so that players can play on maps that they want to.

I said that too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there are issues with this new system that was introduce last week .. where there are players who have clicked on the battle finder and have been send to the same battles over and over again..

 

so what I ask you would now change with this system ...when its still in trial stages and needs to be repaired before you move on to the next level..the dev's aren't even doing test runs there just tossing out all these updates and letting use tell them what is wrong..??

Edited by frozen_heart
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, when two persons are reading the same thing, same book or same Forum post, they don't have the same conclusion and same impressions. Theoretically they can, but it's very rare.

 

But they certainly should not be compelled to accept one opinion.

I agree. :).. But most of the questions are pointless speculations at this moment and can only be realised once the dust settles. Others are logically fallacious arguments which can easily be answered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...