Share your rating!

[Tani_S 736]

"efficiency":{"position":34155,"value":8249017}}

[Sergeant808 81]

Hmmm... but is it really that bad? I mean, your rating grows while you ranking up and you never feel stuck (until you get to end game though). I didn't want anyone to feel anything like ELO-hell, we'll have enough of that in the future.

I'd have to see the tabulation before I could say "good" or "bad". There's certainly wisdom in scaling the rating based upon experience, but we already have a proxy for that in the experience or rank. Rank will dominate until you get to the point that rank doesn't matter anymore (and that sounds like the target range for the rating in the first place). Lower ranks already operate under the assumption that rank approximates skill, since there are only a few outliers for this who fly through promotions. I don't see an issue with this, as long as it only applies to all but the top few ranks.

 

The key is in seeing what differentiates a superior tanker at a given rank from an average one. That is what would make the system brilliant (and since you came up with it, brilliance is certainly possible).

 

Based upon the 7 Feb data available here on the outside, the previous system had a naive linear R² of 0.43 between the rating and the K/D ratio. It would doubtless be even higher if non-linearity of K/D were taken into account. Also, nauseatingly, R² between supplies/hr and the rating was 0.14, meaning that at bare minimum one seventh of your score was simply how much you drugged; ieww. Since parkour supply usage is probably included here, since drugs measures here don't split between repair kits or other supplies, and since drugs/hour is inherently non-linear, it was probably much worse. I didn't see any other listed column (including my contrived measure of crystals per supply) with correlation to this rating.

 

Metrics are hard. I look forward to the next data set.

[M.U.S.T.I.K.K.A 0]

Before...

 

After...

[Bydo 20,124]

yes you can add me with my accounts

 

 

 

Kills  142 558 

Deaths   147 123

K/D   0.97

 

 

 

sorry issues with in the system on tanki fault ...when name changed they never completed the transaction..

.. i still can't log into forum with this account , or even ratings ...

 

 

Kills     65 537

Deaths   68 710

K/D   0.95

Edited February 10, 2017 by frozen_heart

[emrakul 7,801]

Opex-Rah, please, can you clear up, when K/D increases rating and when it lowers it? I think rating grows up until K/D 2 (or 3, 4... I'm just guessing number) and then, higher K/D lowers rating. Am I right? And why should be high K/D bad for rating? I understand, camping in CP, CTF and having high K/D isn't good and doesn't help your team, but on the other side, in DM and TDM especially, high K/D matters. Since you team's success depends on your (and you team's) K/D.
My thoughts, how to increase your rating (only hypotethical): Keep your K/D around 2.00. Earn as much crystals to keep Exp/Cry ratio low (e.g. 1.6 mil exp, 4.5 mil crystals :ph34r: ), however, more experience is better :)
So someone with few mil. exp, great (as low as possible) exp/cry ratio and D/L around 2.00 should have highest rating. (see gold hunters)

[The_Pakistani 16,768]

Its same as before either you write 92k or 92000, it same.. Before it was like 9216 now it is 92169..

Edited February 10, 2017 by The_Pakistani

[asifmak 467]

new

[Lightning78 285]

Opening post updated, with ranking list now based on new rating formula (patch update #439).

- Players in the old ranking list were transferred to new one. Old ranking list is still there, but spoilered

- New players added:

 

 

62009 :D

This new formula seems to be better for me  :wub:  :wub: .
Rating: 58886
Crystals/Xp ratio: 1,21
K/D: 1,08

90598.

Why buyers get better rating?

How do u know players crys./ exp. and sup/ hr.?

yes you can add me with my accounts

 

 

 

Kills  142 558 

Deaths   147 123

K/D   0.97

 

 

 

sorry issues with in the system on tanki fault ...when name changed they never completed the transaction..

.. i still can't log into forum with this account , or even ratings ...

 

 

Kills     65 537

Deaths   68 710

K/D   0.95

 

 

 

Its same as before either you write 92k or 92000, it same.. Before it was like 9216 now it is 92169..

For you it is, but for others the change is massive, see updated opening post :)

[Yisroel.Rabin 16,224]

Ok, hi.

Edited February 10, 2017 by Yisroel.Rabin

[DESTRUKCO 51]

It seems like the most important thing in the new formula is the crystal/exp ratio, the second is total experience earned, and the fourth is kd.

[Lightning78 285]

How do u know players crys./ exp. and sup/ hr.?

Opening post updated with this information..

http://ratings.tankionline.com/get_stat/profile/?user=tankerkuldeep

:)

[Cortana 4,601]

Damn, how did I end up on the 17th position? :o

[Lightning78 285]

Damn, how did I end up on the 17th position? :o

Must be your Cry/EP ratio, which is extremely good (your other stats seem average). How did you achieve that ratio?

[Spit_Fyre 334]

IMHO, this needs to be sorted by rank.

[N221 597]

Edited February 10, 2017 by N221

[CooperO 7,956]

My rating would put me in the 4th place of this list.. Unbelievable. :huh:

[falcosenna1 8,320]

I still don't understand this rating thingy. It's weird some players have a higher rating than me while I'm scoring better at all parameters except for Cry/Exp. This one seems to have a big influence, doesn't it?

 

No need to change the formula again as I don't really care about the ratings. :p

 

Edited February 10, 2017 by falcosenna1

[The_Pakistani 16,768]

I still don't understand this rating thingy. It's weird some players have a higher rating than me while I'm scoring better at all parameters except for Cry/Exp. This one seems to have a big influence, doesn't it?

Cry/Exp and K/D influence more I think.

Edited February 10, 2017 by The_Pakistani

[Cortana 4,601]

How did you achieve that ratio?

Mainly with the help of friends.

[Tani_S 736]

Medicago "efficiency":{"position":368,"value":9248265}

heartlikealion "efficiency":{"position":58,"value":9342077}

 

They always have premium activated  :D

[Sergeant808 81]

Okay, here goes...

 

For all listed users today (minus the ones without updates, and plus the ones which were dropped form the list but had updates), R² for linear correlation between

 

 

• rating and experience: 0.34
• rating and K/D: 0.21
• rating and crystal/experience: 0.21
• rating and supplies/hour: < 0.05
• rating and crystal/supply: < 0.05

 

 

This is noisy. However, I see a straight line through all the low ranks (about 3000 x rank number). What if we look at everyone below the Gizmo rank?

 

 

• rating and experience: 0.95 (! It's your rank. If you want to know your rating, and you're not at the top of the ranks, basically look at the average for your rank. It will be within a few percent from that. We would need to see hundreds more ratings to have a chance of seeing past this.)
• rating and K/D: 0.21
• rating and crystal/experience: 0.45 (but keep in mind that this ratio goes up linearly with rank)
• rating and supplies/hour: < 0.05
• rating and crystal/supply: 0.18

 

 

This rating is rather uninteresting for those who look forward to unlocking equipment at a future rank. We can go away until we're big enough to have a rank party. Even M3 users must follow the leader on ranks for a while. Enough about us peasants; what if we look at everyone at Gizmo or a Legend rank?

 

 

• rating and experience: <0.01 (and it shouldn't matter at this level anyway)
• rating and K/D: 0.15
• rating and crystal/experience: 0.67
• rating and supplies/hour: < 0.01
• rating and crystal/supply: 0.13

 

 

This is correlation, not causation. However, it means that if you're a Gizmo with a high K/D, catch a lot of golds, win a lot of matches, and do this without absolutely spamming the drug keys, then you're probably a great Tanki player according to this rating. That's hard to argue in general. There are possibly specific edge cases (Isida, pure-play gold hunters, playing with regular teammates with Skype), but it seems that those who consistently win Gizmos/Legends-only battles have the highest ratings. That sounds great.

Edited February 10, 2017 by Sergeant808

[Oufa 3,734]

[kmpa 830]

everything from BP  :wub:

 

 

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

New ratings after the update :

position: 1141value: 9195602

[M.3.L.M 581]