Share your rating!

[The_Pakistani 16,768]

Rating should go down if we don't play :) This mechanism is still beyond my imagination.

[fe4f3 1,002]

58130

[Hate 5,582]

58130

If you want to submit your rating in this section, please take a picture of your ratings and post it in here, always quicker, faster and better.

[Lightning78 285]

If you want to submit your rating in this section, please take a picture of your ratings and post it in here, always quicker, faster and better.

Actually it doesn't really matter, since I anyway retrieve the latest stats by script from the ratings page next time I update the full list (probably in a few weeks earliest). So just posting here with the account to be added is sufficient..

[Hate 5,582]

Actually it doesn't really matter, since I anyway retrieve the latest stats by script from the ratings page next time I update the full list (probably in a few weeks earliest). So just posting here with the account to be added is sufficient..

 

quicker

It is quicker if the poster does the work and makes everything ready is what I meant in case you missed my point.  ;) Both are fine too. 

[splitterpoint 10,986]

 

It is quicker if the poster does the work and makes everything ready is what I meant in case you missed my point.  ;) Both are fine too. 

 

What do you mean by making everything ready, didn't he just made out that only the nickname is enough?

He didn't missed your point, you were wrong in the first case.

 

I just realized all I had to do was to mention that I'd like to be on the list instead of making a picture of my rating lol.

Thanks for adding me though!

Edited May 2, 2017 by splitterpoint

[Lightning78 285]

It is quicker if the poster does the work and makes everything ready is what I meant in case you missed my point.  ;) Both are fine too. 

It's not quicker, and I didn't miss your point. As I explained, I will come along in maybe 1 month or so and update the complete list. If I mixed ratings posted 1 month ago with others fully up to date (or older ones), it would not be possible to build a consistent ranking list. For the same reason (and to save some work), I'm not adding individual entries to the existing list.

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

They reworked the ratings or what? I was 1445 before. Now I am 544 with a rating of 9191965.

 

efficiency

    position 544 value 9191965

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

After a few battles :
 
efficiency

    position 628 value 9192004

 

Increased my ratings, but lost around 80 positions :lol: :lol:

 

I guess this is glitching, just like ratings and the server.

[Lightning78 285]

They reworked the ratings or what? I was 1445 before. Now I am 544 with a rating of 9191965.

You're right, something strange must have happened since 1 month ago. I misinterpreted the new table compiled some days ago. In this latest issue, most players had a significant decrease in rating value / efficiency (no surprise there), but the position decreased, i.e. they got better in comparison to others.

 

Let's see how it looks next time around..

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

Of course, we have to find this out on our own. Not a single patch update to tell us they reworked it a little.

[RoyalRumble 4]

You're right, something strange must have happened since 1 month ago. I misinterpreted the new table compiled some days ago. In this latest issue, most players had a significant decrease in rating value / efficiency (no surprise there), but the position decreased, i.e. they got better in comparison to others.

 

Let's see how it looks next time around..

There was a glitch with unlimited gold boxes in parkour "battles". They wiped the weekly raitings and I think somehow the main raiting too.Well, not wiped exactly... The rating became -0 for everybody. Let's say u were the first one to start playing after that. Your rating became 1... then Hate returned and bacame #1 and you #2... then emrakul came back and took your 2-nd place... and so on.

[Lightning78 285]

There was a glitch with unlimited gold boxes in parkour "battles". They wiped the weekly raitings and I think somehow the main raiting too.Well, not wiped exactly... The rating became -0 for everybody. Let's say u were the first one to start playing after that. Your rating became 1... then Hate returned and bacame #1 and you #2... then emrakul came back and took your 2-nd place... and so on.

Thanks, that explanation makes sense. But there must have been several resets, also between the last full update of the list on 29/04 and today. In my case:

- On 29/04/2017, my account was at position 848 with a rating efficiency of 92185.05

- Now, it's at position 648 with a rating efficiency of 92181.74

=> again, position improves despite decrease of efficiency..

[RoyalRumble 4]

It was less than a week ago.

 

 position improves despite decrease of efficiency..

That's because not all of the players, that were higher than you, came back yet. They may come back in a few days or in a year and reclaim their rightfull place)) Unless you improve your efficiency of course.

----

Why do you think Sup/h and EP/h are in the rating formula?

[fe4f3 1,002]

 

It is quicker if the poster does the work and makes everything ready is what I meant in case you missed my point.  ;) Both are fine too. 

 

To write is quicker for me. :)

[Lightning78 285]

Why do you think Sup/h and EP/h are in the rating formula?

I don't think it's part of the rating formula - the list maintained in this topic rather shows that this doesn't seem to play a big role. For instance, among the people with good ratings are both very heavy and light supply users. Just an interesting stat I'm getting for free when I retrieve the info from the profile pages.

 

Biggest factor for the rating efficiency seems to be the Cry/EP ratio.

[The_Pakistani 16,768]

Ranking updated.

Your mean Profiles?

[TheRollingSlab 803]

Ranking updated.

Thank you. New profiles look awesome :P

[The_Pakistani 16,768]

No privacy left.. Also show on profile that

How much Crystals I have right now

How much supplies left in my garage

blah blah...

[Cortana 4,601]

Ranking updated.

The glitched golds weren't removed from profiles, and lemme guess, neither were crystals. Look at this guy for example, 4000 golds....

 

http://ratings.tankionline.com/en/user/1OOO/

[Crip 4,735]

No privacy left.. Also show on profile that

How much Crystals I have right now

How much supplies left in my garage

blah blah...

No.

 

The "Crystals Obtained" is the number of crystals that you have earned (overall).

The "Supplies Used" is the number of supplies you have used.

 

Surely it's fairly obvious?

[The_Pakistani 16,768]

No.

 

The "Crystals Obtained" is the number of crystals that you have earned (overall).

The "Supplies Used" is the number of supplies you have used.

 

Surely it's fairly obvious?

Read again what I've said :ph34r:

[Tani_S 736]

In the profile pages the "Time in game" tag should be renamed to "Hours played in game", because the unit is missing.

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

Ranking updated.

 

 

[Cortana 4,601]

Oh, and I'm #10 now :blush:

I was like #29 before the update, what happened? :wacko: