Invalid Convert fully upgraded LGC modules to 50% protection

[D.a.n.t.e 475]

All quad modules must be fully micro upgraded to 50%, not 40%.

Devs don't want modules to have more than 150 of combined protection, with your idea the total will be 200, way too much for them. With 40% each the total would be 160, much better.

 

Remember that this type of changes affect everyone, even buyers. I'm pretty sure you don't want to see buyers with 200%, while it will take non buyers months to buy some Micro Upgrades.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Developers will have to figure out a proper way on how to properly balance out the prices of modules when quadruple modules come out.

 

I do understand that fact the developers don't want to have a total of 200 of combined protection, but the protection level is shared between all four turrets. That is 50 of protection for each of the four turrets.

 

With the addition of Striker and Magnum, players are now more vulnerable to getting killed with the lack of protections in one module. That is the reason why I am asking for quadruple modules.

[D.a.n.t.e 475]

Developers will have to figure out a proper way on how to properly balance out the prices of modules when quadruple modules come out.

 

I do understand that fact the developers don't want to have a total of 200 of combined protection, but the protection level is shared between all four turrets. That is 50 of protection for each of the four turrets.

 

With the addition of Striker and Magnum, players are now more vulnerable to getting killed with the lack of protections in one module. That is the reason why I am asking for quadruple modules.

I understand, we need quad modules. But keep this in mind...

 

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=348965&page=1&do=findComment&comment=6004162

[lukey0 27,543]

I like the idea.

 

New module price = Type of Module price (1, 2 or 3 protections) - The price originally paid.  

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Me too. I like the idea.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

This was my idea.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

LGC legacy protection modes must be converted to 50% otherwise they are useless. Please convert all LGC legacy modules to 50% protection.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

I really hope that this suggestion of mine shall be soon taken into consideration. I have spent so many crystals in the past, to buy paints that are now converted into LGC legacy modules. Those modules have very low protection, so those LGC Legacy modules must absolutely be converted to 50% protection.

 

This applies to all LGC legacy protection modules, single, double, triple and quadruple.

[D.a.n.t.e 475]

I really hope that this suggestion of mine shall be soon taken into consideration. I have spent so many crystals in the past, to buy paints that are now converted into LGC legacy modules. Those modules have very low protection, so those LGC Legacy modules must absolutely be converted to 50% protection.

 

This applies to all LGC legacy protection modules, single, double, triple and quadruple.

You should clarify that you want 50% for Triple Modules, and 40% for Quad Modules. Remember what Hazel said about Quad Modules with 50% in Vlog 140.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Yes, I do remember what Hazel-Rah said in V-Log 140 about quadruple modules.

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

I think that a better idea is to refund all legacy modules and do away with them, so that we all can play on the same ground.

I think that "old" players deserve to keep the Legacy module. It shows that they are committed to the game for a long time.

 

Also, it will be quite hard to refund the Legacy modules if you think about the price of the old paint. If you bought Clay, you will get a big refund for the Legacy module since Clay costs only 10k now. But if you bought Emerald (370k actual price), Iribis (400k), Inferno (440k), Tiger (500k), Nano(350k), Africa (400k) before the module update, you will get a ridiculous refund for the module.

[Pink_Legacy 269]

I think that "old" players deserve to keep the Legacy module. It shows that they are committed to the game for a long time.

 

Also, it will be quite hard to refund the Legacy modules if you think about the price of the old paint. If you bought Clay, you will get a big refund for the Legacy module since Clay costs only 10k now. But if you bought Emerald (370k actual price), Iribis (400k), Inferno (440k), Tiger (500k), Nano(350k), Africa (400k) before the module update, you will get a ridiculous refund for the module.

Yep, I had already answered your second concern:

 

Or even better, change them for normal modules with the same total protection. I really can't find an easier way to sort out the issue.

As for your first concern, well, I was playing this game before the rebalance (and also before the paint-protection separation). I bought a Hornet that was tougher than Wasp. Don't I deserve to keep it because it shows my commitment to the game for a "long time"?

[D.a.n.t.e 475]

All modules can be converted to a new module system, you just take into account how many modules people have and how many MUs those modules have.

 

Let's say someone who has the most modules and most MUs on those modules in the entire game has X number of modules fully upgraded, we can say that person has x number of credits. Then on the other side of the spectrum it will be Recruits with no modules at all, they will have 0 credits.

 

Now you divide the x number of credits into 13, and that will be the credit for each single modules to be of certain modification, with a certain number of MUs. The Recruit with 0 credits will get nothing.

 

This can be used to convert all modules to quad modules with single protections of 40%.

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

Well, we can't do anything about the hulls and turrets rebalance :/ we jus tundergo it. I know it's not fair when you bought a hull or a turret and it becomes totally useless after a rebalance, I know the feeling, they ruined Smoky for example.

 

But at least, old players get to keep the Legacy Modules... for now.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Developers will not refund modules. Instead, they will upgrade all LGC Protection modules to 50%.

[99polarbear 0]

Do we have any chance to continue update old protection? I have played this game several years.So I bought a lot of protection before.But some protection high up to 35 or 45.So I hope its can be continue update to 50.

[Hate 5,582]

 

Topic merged.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Why did Hate merged my topic with someone else's. This is my topic, so please do not merge it.

[Aunty_Entity 245]

LGC legacy protection modes must be converted to 50% otherwise they are useless. Please convert all LGC legacy modules to 50% protection.

How many times do you have to repeat yourself? Sheesh.  One good idea, and now you're dribbling on and on.. you've had your say 10-15 times already... shush... :P

 

I to have many LGC modules.... we knew what they were when we bought them.  We bought them because they were either cheap or good at the time we bought them, and that's the best you can do.  Aunty says, leave them alone.  Don't forget the paints you bought on discount, like in love on Valentines day for 1 crystal.... Perhaps look at the pricing for upgrades to current limits BUT they do not require their own limits expanded.

 

You won't get 50% on your quadules, because the extra 10% worth of protection is the fact you have a whole extra protection there. You're talking about making something no one can now buy wildly OP.  Whether or not you feel quadules ought to be for sale now is an entirely different question, and this portion is just a step to help justify that. So in this discussion that's a no.

 

Aunty

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Two years ago, I have purchased the In Love paint at 90% off. I hope that we have such a big discount on micro upgrades.

[Aunty_Entity 245]

Two years ago, I have purchased the In Love paint at 90% off. I hope that we have such a big discount on micro upgrades.

Good luck with that

 

BTW: you should stop think of LGC modules being underpowered, and start thinking of them as obsolete.  Do you still go back to Uncle Bill at microsoft looking for upgrades of windows 3.11??  Or Intel because your 286 Processor is lagging a bit?  The short answer is no.  This is exactly what LGC modules are.  They used the be THE best.  But they're a dinosaur just let them die gracefully and in peace.

 

You should be making the most of what you have, not trying to make it into something it was never intended to be.  I still get in love out, not because its a fabulous module, but because its the best fit for the weapons on the park and it is still far better than nothing, and I obviously don't want my heart frozen and that's the major concern for in love.

 

Aunty

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

I do understand what you mean, but it is possible for developers to convert and upgrade LGC legacy protection modules to 50% protection.

[Aunty_Entity 245]

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should...  :)

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should...  :)

But they can and they should, LGC Modules occupy a lot of space in Garages. They should become triple modules with 50%.

[Aunty_Entity 245]

But they can and they should, LGC Modules occupy a lot of space in Garages. They should become triple modules with 50%.

And the ones with a higher value remain useful, but, and this is the BIG but, none of the LGC paints were originally meant to last forever.  You had to purchase a whole new paint, just like you have to buy a not module if you want to exceed certain parameters.

 

We'll have agree to disagree, because that's a NO! The original game balance didn't call for any of these modules to go to 50%, remembering there we're not m0-3 protection levels on paints.  You're talking about putting a lot of 50's in garages that don't deserve it.  If we stick with in love for arguments sake, the best it would qualify for, with a freeze resistance of 18 is m1 maybe, with a max of 25 so to take it out to 50 is counterproductive and ludicrous.  You'll OP the garage of anyone with LGC modules.

 

Aunty