Declined Add "Forum Membership - Reputation"

[Flaw 16]

Many other forums have this, you pay for a membership such as VIP or Elite and you can negative and positive rep someone. 

 

 

The more positive reputation shows that you are a well liked member in the community and negative would be...

[Maf 32,328]

Declined

 

We don't want to restrict any forum features with a pay wall. If reputation gets added, it will be for everyone. And I'm pretty sure this will be implemented once this forum upgrades to the better forum engine.

[dilsharox 2,395]

why would anyone pay to just to rep some total stranger you meet here?

[railguniz4noobz 2,394]

Everyone would just rep oufa and derep riddler. 

[Crimson_Tank 285]

WHY?? 

[Crimson_Tank 285]

why would anyone pay to just to rep some total stranger you meet here?

 

.

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

why would anyone pay to just to rep some total stranger you meet here?

why would anyone pay just to change the looks of a virtual tank, or pay to make one virtual tank more likely to kill other virtual tanks, or for an animation of a box to fall from the sky so some random people can catch it

[deafeat1 271]

Really bro?

 

 

 

 

[D.a.n.t.e 475]

Bad idea. People will try to be nice and maybe not say the things that need to be said, however unpopular that may be.

[Mario3108 462]

The forum is a place for discussions and it must be completely free .-.

Reputation will be implemented with the another forum engine and players will be able to give only positive reputation.

[dilsharox 2,395]

Why would anybody buy crystals for M1s and M2s even though they're not permanent? :o

 

why would anyone pay just to change the looks of a virtual tank, or pay to make one virtual tank more likely to kill other virtual tanks, or for an animation of a box to fall from the sky so some random people can catch it

you cannot compare the game with the forum 

would you pay to facebook just so you could like a photo? 

[Crimson_Tank 285]

you cannot compare the game with the forum 

would you pay to facebook just so you could like a photo? 

I don't use Facebook, and how exactly am I comparing the game with the forum? And again Facebook is for old people. 

[Coat 2,280]

Really bro?

 

 

 

 

No, he's not.

[dilsharox 2,395]

I don't use Facebook, and how exactly am I comparing the game with the forum? And again Facebook is for old people. 

you were saying about buying crys 

having the ability to give reputations will not help u in any way buying crys on the other hands helps you to buy garage equipment 

old people? i dont thin s how old are you/////////////////.

[Crimson_Tank 285]

you were saying about buying crys 

having the ability to give reputations will not help u in any way buying crys on the other hands helps you to buy garage equipment 

old people? i dont thin s how old are you/////////////////.

Oh wait wrong topic. 

[Kroboski88 94]

Declined

 

We don't want to restrict any forum features with a pay wall. If reputation gets added, it will be for everyone. And I'm pretty sure this will be implemented once this forum upgrades to the better forum engine.

you mean added back?

[Maf 32,328]

you mean added back?

Users' personal reputation was never a thing on this forum, as far as I know.

[railguniz4noobz 2,394]

Users' personal reputation was never a thing on this forum, as far as I know.

We at least had a dislike button.

[Maf 32,328]

We at least had a dislike button.

...which was abused to bully users by mass-disliking their posts for no reason.

[railguniz4noobz 2,394]

...which was abused to bully users by mass-disliking their posts for no reason.

And? If someone just dislikes everyones posts, it loses all its value. How is it any different from mass liking posts for no reason? Their reasoning for it was so people had to say what they didnt like about a post, why shouldnt you have to tell someone what you like?

[Maf 32,328]

And? If someone just dislikes everyones posts, it loses all its value. How is it any different from mass liking posts for no reason? Their reasoning for it was so people had to say what they didnt like about a post, why shouldnt you have to tell someone what you like?

Because when you "like" something, it means that you agree with it or admire it and everything is good - the receiver of your "like" is happy. But when you dislike it and don't put a reason, the receiver will be in an uncomfortable position where they got a negative response but no way to know what was wrong about what they posted. Forcing people to reply instead of leaving a dislike generates more constructive criticism, which is far more useful than a dislike.

[railguniz4noobz 2,394]

Because when you "like" something, it means that you agree with it or admire it and everything is good - the receiver of your "like" is happy. But when you dislike it and don't put a reason, the receiver will be in an uncomfortable position where they got a negative response but no way to know what was wrong about what they posted. Forcing people to reply instead of leaving a dislike generates more constructive criticism, which is far more useful than a dislike.

And what about likes? If someone likes something, the poster will assume its perfect. Constructive criticism is always a good thing, but removing dislikes doesnt help at all.

[Maf 32,328]

And what about likes? If someone likes something, the poster will assume its perfect. Constructive criticism is always a good thing, but removing dislikes doesnt help at all.

Well, you're entitled to that opinion, but devs already made their decision and most players seem to agree with it. I'm afraid you're a minority.