Declined Remove ban for real money

[r_Mr.Mars7 62]

Maybe tanki should add a feature that allows players to pay to get unbanned, for instance I get baned for a week, but I'm impatient and can't wait that long, so I go to the shop and pay for the removal of the ban, the removal would cost about 1-2$, this "may" increase tankis revenue a little, and i don't see why phishers/scammers would want to pay and get banned again.

[Maf 32,338]

Declined

 

Corruption is a bad thing, you know?

[Guest TSY_the_crazy]

Declined

 

Corruption is a bad thing, you know?

No

 

---

Good idea tbh, but you should increase prices for longer bans.

[Maf 32,338]

Good idea tbh, but you should increase prices for longer bans.

Do you realise what this means? It means that rich players will have no regard for punishment. Clans will keep using mults with even greater intensity, and the work of battle moderators will be wasted because the violators will just buy their way out of bans. And all for what? A little bit extra revenue for the devs?

 

I'm sorry, but doing this would be even worse than adding hardcore P2W items.

 

In the real world any community where rich people can openly use their power to disregard the law is a community on its way to chaos and anarchy. Like I said, corruption is a bad thing.

[Guest TSY_the_crazy]

Do you realise what this means? It means that rich players will have no regard for punishment. Clans will keep using mults with even greater intensity, and the work of battle moderators will be wasted because the violators will just buy their way out of bans. ANd all for what? A little bit extra revenue for the devs?

 

I'm sorry, but doing this would be even worse than adding hardcore P2W items.

Isn't that what devs want? P2W?

[Maf 32,338]

Isn't that what devs want? P2W?

Believe it or not, but that's not what they are going for.

[Guest TSY_the_crazy]

Believe it or not, but that's not what they are going for.

Well they aren't very successful were they?

[Pyre 3,485]

Well they aren't very successful were they?

Its much better than many other games. (*cough tanki X cough*.)

[Kurt_KurtDGreat 2,259]

Helllllll naw, that's like a guy bribing the judge so he doesn't go to prison. What's the point then?

 

 

 

Yet I still am willing to accept bribes for people to do bad stuff and not get banned by me

 

 

There's no guarantee I won't tell other mods to ban you tho mwahaha..

 

 

And before anyone even thinksss of taking me seriously, this is obviously a joke ._.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

Declined

 

Corruption is a bad thing, you know?

it's not the same thing. this is like bailing yourself out of prison.

[Maf 32,338]

Well they aren't very successful were they?

They are. At the moment there's already some balance between buyers and free players, and it will hopefully be even better after MM is released. Considering that Tanki is a free to play game, the P2W aspect of it could be a LOT worse than it is now.

 

Its much better than many other games. (*cough tanki X cough*.)

Definitely better than other games, but why did you take Tanki X as an example? In TX there's barely any P2W items, especially after the arms race update.

[Guest TSY_the_crazy]

Okei you win nug, but it isn't your decision. Is the devs ;)

[Pyre 3,485]

They are. At the moment there's already some balance between buyers and free players, and it will hopefully be even better after MM is released. Considering that Tanki is a free to play game, the P2W aspect of it could be a LOT worse than it is now.

 

Definitely better than other games, but why did you take Tanki X as an example? In TX there's barely any P2W items, especially after the arms race update.

I actually feel like TX has become more p2w after the update. Every time I go into a battle, there is often some guy who has probably spent $50 on the game, he has a full set of tier three modules. Being a free player, I naturally have no chance. This is why I prefer TO, at least I have access to the most powerful equipment, even if I have to save many crystals to get it. In TX, I cannot get a single tier 3 module no matter how hard I try, until I get into the Silver league. (Impossible, because I always get crushed the the "buyers" mentioned above.) Anyway, my point is I feel that TX has become very P2W, but that is just my opinion. Maybe it gets better in the higher leagues, I would not know.

[Stratosphere 2,234]

This idea is terrible! Basically people who spend money will be able to do anything they want flame/spam/hack and never be punished. Things never, ever go well when the rich can do whatever they want.

 

Maybe thats why the world is in such a mess?

[SprayGround 2,851]

Good idea tbh, but you should increase prices for longer bans.

Are you actually serious? :mellow:

The game would be full of mults and abusers because they wouldn't care about punishments since they can pay to get out of it.

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

Are you actually serious? :mellow:

The game would be full of mults and abusers because they wouldn't care about punishments since they can pay to get out of it.

as if there is any difference between people paying to make my team lose by being on my side and people who pay to make my team lose by being on the enemy team.

[Stratosphere 2,234]

as if there is any difference between people paying to make my team lose by being on my side and people who pay to make my team lose by being on the enemy team.

The difference is that players on your team who try to make you lose are called mults/sabotage. And those are banned.

[Guest TSY_the_crazy]

Are you actually serious? :mellow:

The game would be full of mults and abusers because they wouldn't care about punishments since they can pay to get out of it.

Yes,but not everyone is a buyer. They're a small minority of the game. And buyers buy to win not lose. They should introduce this feature as a promo code gift too.

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

The difference is that players on your team who try to make you lose are called mults/sabotage. And those are banned.

who cares man, both mults and buyers make the game unfair. I don't care what happens to them after the battle, what matters is how they affect that battle

[SprayGround 2,851]

Yes,but not everyone is a buyer. They're a small minority of the game. And buyers buy to win not lose. They should introduce this feature as a promo code gift too.

There is many people who buy, and it would be even more if they could pay to get out of punishments.

[Guest TSY_the_crazy]

There is many people who buy, and it would be even more if they could pay to get out of punishments.

Make it expensive then ;)

[SprayGround 2,851]

Make it expensive then ;)

I have better idea, don't make it at all. Like seriously, it would make game even worse.

[Guest TSY_the_crazy]

I have better idea, don't make it at all. Like seriously, it would make game even worse.

How do you know? Test it first.

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

how about remove the supplies kit from the garage but implement this. make it easier for people to get banned and make it very expensive to get unbanned. one mult on my team doesn't affect me as much as one druger on the enemy team does

[CooperO 7,956]

How do you know? Test it first.

An idea like this will not be tested, regardless of the possibility it would make the game better. Not only would it completely undermine the game rules, it would also be a form of corruption, like @Maf already said.