Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Give out a poll before implementing an update


Recommended Posts

Declined

 

If developers wanted to do this, they would have. The reason why most of the time these's no point doing this is because developers already know how many players will be in favour or against an update. If they were to do a poll and the results of such a poll would be heavily negative, the update would still be released because it's necessary. For example, Matchmaking, the "Battle!" button, removal of missions from PRO - all these updates got a lot of negative feedback, but they are necessary to keep the game alive.

 

Also, a lot of people dislike an update even without trying it simply because they're used to the game in its current state and don't want change. This also affects results of a pre-update poll, since there will be more negativity compared to if this poll was held after the update's release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Declined

 

If developers wanted to do this, they would have. The reason why most of the time these's no point doing this is because developers already know how many players will be in favour or against an update. If they were to do a poll and the results of such a poll would be heavily negative, the update would still be released because it's necessary. For example, Matchmaking, the "Battle!" button, removal of missions from PRO - all these updates got a lot of negative feedback, but they are necessary to keep the game alive.

 

Also, a lot of people dislike an update even without trying it simply because they're used to the game in its current state and don't want change. This also affects results of a pre-update poll, since there will be more negativity compared to if this poll was held after the update's release.

Come on

None of them is necessary the game lived 8 years without match making and others

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on

None of them is necessary the game lived 8 years without match making and others

Because back in 2010 matchmaking was not a thing. Times pass, games improve, new features are invented. Tanki needs to keep up if they want to stay relevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because back in 2010 matchmaking was not a thing. Times pass, games improve, new features are invented. Tanki needs to keep up if they want to stay relevant.

I think Tanki should do what players want, to not lose them and to make the game more fun instead of giving players less freedom

 

Let's make a deal, make this idea under review and I'll give you the rainbow text power

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Tanki should do what players want, to not lose them and to make the game more fun instead of giving players less freedom

Thing is, players want more crystals, more discounts, free stuff, etc.  And that doesn't work if the game wants to keep getting revenue and new players to stay alive.

 

 

No thanks, I got it covered.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, players want more crystals, more discounts, free stuff, etc.  And that doesn't work if the game wants to keep getting revenue and new players to stay alive.

 

 

No thanks, I got it covered.

 

Tbh, not all tanki updates are bad, there is profiles, missions and even Overdrive so if the updates poll came to the game, not every idea will recieve an negative result as they ain't like the "mission in non-PRO battles only update" which 100% of players are against

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tbh, not all tanki updates are bad, there is profiles, missions and even Overdrive so if the updates poll came to the game, not every idea will recieve an negative result as they ain't like the "mission in non-PRO battles only update" which 100% of players are against

But only some of the updates are welcomed. Matchmaking lagged the server.

 

 

PS rainbow text is for spammers only. It is available at VIP level , given only to spammers.

 

 

 

© Copyright trooll 2018

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, ok, but devs dont need to make it 50% for idea to pass.

Honestly, i dont see a reason why you are implementing this new MMS (matchmaking system).

 

All those years (2012-2017), i played on laptop, that never lagged to me. Since the servers got unified, i lag a lot. Why you unified servers, i dont know, i will just tell you this: Low rankers had enough battles in servers 10 - 24, depending on rank, lower rank -> higher server number.

When i reached WOs, i played in servers EU 8 - 13. When i reached major rank, till server unifing (i was at 4 stars rank, General i think), i played on EU 8 and EU 5. If i wanted to play some PRO battles, i went on server EU 1.

What i want to say, i could find  a proper battle for my rank.

I doubt that when MMS gets implemented, i will play in battles where Marshal is the highest  (it was able to find battles like that before).

 

About the update to remove missions from PRO battles, that is ok, it was made to remove "cheating" from missions.

 

What i meant to give a pool about, it's for updates like OD -> players should be able to vote what OD they want for what hull.

This OD now, i think it's the best, i can get on dictator. I play with dictator only in 10x golds when gold drops. Wasp's bomb is ok (i think, i dont know what will be the damage of a bomb).

 

So, why not to give a poll about those updates that affect the players the most, and gameplay too.

 

MMS is still not needed by me anyway. I could always find a battle.

Right now, i cant remember any updates, but i can comment them if you say some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, the update that made all M3s available on Marshal rank, what's the purpose?

Thunder that was available on rank of Brigadier, and Firebird that was available on Generallisimo.

Devs (or whoever) told that thunder is OP on it's rank, and when you reach Gene. rank it gets not so strong. Also, Firebird gets more powered.

That way, i got it like Thunder is weak against Firebird.

You wanted to balance it by making all M3s available on Marshal, i dont know what you made with that.

Then, why arent we able to get all M2s on Major rank, and all M1s on WO 1 or whatever? Explain this to me please.

 

Also, you could give out a poll, do players want that they can buy any M3 on Marshal, or be available to get M3 1 by 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if we test the update  in test server  like the test server open for 50 min after that it will close and a forum wil bring out and u need to vote how u like it  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I support this idea but I will pretend to be Mafioso in this post, except I will be more truthfull (I'm not saying maf is lying, I'm just trying to unveil the underlying and true reason): 

 

Declined.

 

If developers wanted to do this, they would have. The reason why most of the time there's no point doing this is because developers already know how many players will be in favour or against an update. If they were to do a poll and the results of such a pull would be heavily negative, the update would still be released because it's necessary for the devs to make money. For example, Premium Accounts, Protection Modules, new Legend rank - all these updates got a lot of negative feedback, but it is necessary to help make the devs make money. 

 

A lot of people dislike an update even without trying it because they don't want buyers to have an even more advantage than non-buyers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But only some of the updates are welcomed. Matchmaking lagged the server.

 

 

PS rainbow text is for spammers only. It is available at VIP level , given only to spammers.

 

 

 

© Copyright trooll 2018

Well, Maf is Ideas & segguestions spammer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this totally should get added

 

Declined

 

If developers wanted to do this, they would have. The reason why most of the time these's no point doing this is because developers already know how many players will be in favour or against an update. If they were to do a poll and the results of such a poll would be heavily negative, the update would still be released because it's necessary. For example, Matchmaking, the "Battle!" button, removal of missions from PRO - all these updates got a lot of negative feedback, but they are necessary to keep the game alive.

 

Also, a lot of people dislike an update even without trying it simply because they're used to the game in its current state and don't want change. This also affects results of a pre-update poll, since there will be more negativity compared to if this poll was held after the update's release.

no . . . they totally do not now. the health box??? everyone hated it and it is not needed for the game at all. . . as for pre-update- you could just change it to after the update. the game is for the tankers. . . you get money from us . . . if u dont do what we want=less money 4 u = lose-lose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 the game is for the tankers. . . you get money from us . . . if u dont do what we want=less money 4 u = lose-lose

It's not as simple as that. Not all updates are meant to benefit current players, and even the updates for players are not for all players at once. Some updates are good for free players and bad for "buyers", some updates are good for "noobs" and bad for "pros". Some are aimed at players who will join the game in the future, but they are bad for current players (such as repair kit, supply changes and Matchmaking).

 

For example, changing the repair kit and adding matchmaking will make the game more suitable for a new generation of players, meaning that they will be more likely to stay in the game after they join, instead of leaving as soon as they experience the unbalanced battles and OP supplies. And new players staying = more revenue for developers.

 

Thing is, players don't spend more money on the game if they like an update. It's not a case of "Oh cool, they added a new thing I like, I'm gonna pay them $20 for that!). If players simply get what they want, like containers, game modes, increased rewards, discounts, etc., then they will just keep playing the game without spending any more than they did before.

 

 

TL;DR

To keep the game up and running, updates have to benefit everyone involved, not just current active players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Tanki should do what players want, to not lose them and to make the game more fun instead of giving players less freedom

 

 

 

 

 

          ^.^ Players would want to eventually get paid to play this game and they would still not be happy and pleased about it. I think Tanki is already giving enough/everything for free. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Battles will never be balanced. Never!

Who gets benefit from RK (repair kit) update?

 

Oh, i am pretty sure that newbies would rather choose to fight gainst bunch of legends with M4 and drugs than playing with their rank +/- 3 with only pick ups, yea, that's 100% sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...