Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Math


 Share

Recommended Posts

jwqQ9g.jpg

Don't know very much of factorials, but my guess is that n= 5000.833!

 

Anyone who knows the answer, please do correct me. 

 

Edit: My "solution" assumes linear growth of zeroes, thus I'd think it's wrong. I used the coordinates (6,1) which is to say that 6! has 1 zero, and the other coordinate was (11,2) which is the same as before in terms of format. Then I determined the equation of such a line and graphed it with another line of y=1000 (which is 1000 zeroes) and the intersection is 5000.833. That's what I did, now where am I wrong?

Edited by LOLKILLERTOTHEDEATH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jwqQ9g.jpg

Answer is 4000<x<5000 because every multiple of five times two is a 0 and 5>2 so 5n>2n so every multiple of 5 is another one 0 added but 100 is two zeroes. Let me do this on paper

 

 

Answer is 4005

 

Don't know very much of factorials, but my guess is that n= 5000.833!

 

Anyone who knows the answer, please do correct me.

 

Edit: My "solution" assumes linear growth of zeroes, thus I'd think it's wrong. I used the coordinates (6,1) which is to say that 6! has 1 zero, and the other coordinate was (11,2) which is the same as before in terms of format. Then I determined the equation of such a line and graphed it with another line of y=1000 (which is 1000 zeroes) and the intersection is 5000.833. That's what I did, now where am I wrong?

You have to count for the 5 squared numbers giving additional zeroes as well as the fact that 5! gives one 0 but is less than 6!

Edited by r_trooll15
3 posts merged, kindly refrain from multi-posting.
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 x 1 = 1

So why does many 1s = more than many 1s?

111 111 111 x 111 111 111 = 12345678987654321

earth flat4sure

Because 11*11=121

1 1

1 1

___

1 1

+ 1 1

_____

1 2 1

 

Also, #flatearth4life

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Answer is 4000<x<5000 because every multiple of five times two is a 0 and 5>2 so 5n>2n so every multiple of 5 is another one 0 added but 100 is two zeroes. Let me do this on paper

 

Answer is 4005

 

You have to count for the 5 squared numbers giving additional zeroes as well as the fact that 5! gives one 0 but is less than 6!

I see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could I prove 1+1=2 as such?

 

1+1 = 2

 

(derrivitative of 1) + (derrivitative of 1) = (derrivitative of 2)

 

(derrivitative of 1) = 0 and (derrivitative of 2)=0

 

therefore

 

0+0=0

 

proven? I was just bored so I thought I'll try this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could I prove 1+1=2 as such?

 

1+1 = 2

 

(derrivitative of 1) + (derrivitative of 1) = (derrivitative of 2)

 

(derrivitative of 1) = 0 and (derrivitative of 2)=0

 

therefore

 

0+0=0

 

proven? I was just bored so I thought I'll try this.

Doesn't work like that :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could I prove 1+1=2 as such?

 

1+1 = 2

 

(derrivitative of 1) + (derrivitative of 1) = (derrivitative of 2)

 

(derrivitative of 1) = 0 and (derrivitative of 2)=0

 

therefore

 

0+0=0

 

proven? I was just bored so I thought I'll try this.

Its usually

d/dx or dy/dx in front of the equal sign

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see. I'll be getting to know calculus much better next year, so I'm quite eager for that. In the mean time, is anyone interested in looking at math pictures drawn via Desmos which are in some way related to the stereotype of nerds? I'd also love to see what trooll and darkness can draw too, I'd bet that my stuff won't be half as amazing as theirs.

 

Batman logo, Flash logo and lastly, the rebellion symbol.

 

Also, is there any relation such that I can have one x value with different y values? I know such an equation cannot be a function, but still.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also say that 3 + 5 = 9 because d/dx (3) + d/dx (5) = d/dx (9). But as trooll said, that's not how it works.

 

You can think of a derivative as the relationship between velocity and position, and velocity and acceleration. Say you are moving at a constant speed of 50 mph. Since your speed is constant, your acceleration is 0. So when you are adding up the derivatives of constants, you can imagine adding up accelerations, if that makes any sense.

 

The thing is, if you are travelling at constant speed, no matter what it is, the acceleration will always be 0. Let's say my car has a speedometer without any labels - all I can see is the motion of the needle. If the needle is not moving, I know I am travelling at a constant speed, but I have no way of knowing exactly what that speed is. This is why the derivatives of constants doesn't actually tell us much about the constants themselves. The derivative of the expression 1+1=2 gives us 0+0=0, but the anti-derivative of 0+0=0 can be any combination of numbers.

Aha! makes perfect sense! Thanks for explaining that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's Tau?

Tau is normally refer to greek letter in the greek alphabet. Like Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta etc.

 

But in math term. Tau is refer to 2π

Tau is better than pi. Coz Tau is double.

 

pi = 3.141592

Tau = 6.28318

Edited by Heles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tau is normally refer to greek letter in the greek alphabet. Like Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta etc.

 

But in math term. Tau is refer to 2π

Tau is better than pi. Coz Tau is double.

 

pi = 3.141592

Tau = 6.28318

Ah yes, I just watched a video on Khan Academy about it. The "creation" of tau makes sense to me, especially for graphs and also for the Euler's identity, however is there a sort of method/proof behind the creation of tau or is it just something that was created to make a few things easier?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, I just watched a video on Khan Academy about it. The "creation" of tau makes sense to me, especially for graphs and also for the Euler's identity, however is there a sort of method/proof behind the creation of tau or is it just something that was created to make a few things easier?

Oh lol. My full name is Ibtihaj Khurram Khan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, I just watched a video on Khan Academy about it. The "creation" of tau makes sense to me, especially for graphs and also for the Euler's identity, however is there a sort of method/proof behind the creation of tau or is it just something that was created to make a few things easier?

Ya, Khan Academy is really help 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tau is normally refer to greek letter in the greek alphabet. Like Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta etc.

 

But in math term. Tau is refer to 2π

Tau is better than pi. Coz Tau is double.

 

pi = 3.141592

Tau = 6.28318

Tau is so much better for radians!!!!

I want 1/8 Tau of a pie. That is 1/8 of that pie.

1/8π of a pie is a 16th of a pie???

A π of a pie is half of a pie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tau is so much better for radians!!!!

I want 1/8 Tau of a pie. That is 1/8 of that pie.

1/8π of a pie is a 16th of a pie???

A π of a pie is half of a pie.

Lol

Soo much better when graphing trig radians 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...