Declined Remove Damaging teams option in pro battles

[RevengeAttacker 217]

Never used, even if it is used; useless.
Remove it and make a better feature.

[Maf 32,330]

Declined

 

It doesn't hurt anyone by being available. Besides, some people do use it for fun.

[railguniz4noobz 2,394]

Declined

 

It doesn't hurt anyone by being available.

Yes it does. Games with this option are unplayable since teammates are constantly killing eachother. Heavy hulls sit on the flag so they can kill the flag runners for easy experience.

 

Every game with this option enabled takes away from other, actual games.

[Maf 32,330]

Yes it does. Games with this option are unplayable since teammates are constantly killing eachother. 

But then just don't join such games?

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

Another declined idea with no good reason.

[railguniz4noobz 2,394]

But then just don't join such games?

Theres players in these games that could be in other games, maybe that deck-9 ctf would be full if such games didnt exist.

[ThirdOnion 4,898]

Theres players in these games that could be in other games, maybe that deck-9 ctf would be full if such games didnt exist.

The percentage of games with friendly fire on is too low to make any palpable difference on the number of playable matches available.

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

The percentage of games with friendly fire on is too low to make any palpable difference on the number of playable matches available.

Yes, but if they also remove the Autobalance ON/OFF option we can have more joinable battles.

 

Friendly fire and Autobalance should only exist in Parkour and Private.

[ZivOfficial 291]

Never used, even if it is used; useless.

Remove it and make a better feature.

Agreed.

Kids mults are killing teammates and this is annoying..

Yes it does. Games with this option are unplayable since teammates are constantly killing eachother. Heavy hulls sit on the flag so they can kill the flag runners for easy experience.

 

Every game with this option enabled takes away from other, actual games.

+

[RevengeAttacker 217]

Thanks for the feedback, but I wanna know if your opinion would differ if we could use that space for a better feature.

[Potdindy 866]

I think there is an Esports format that turns friendly fire on. Idk why but its a thing

[GuidoFawkes 2,361]

I played about 10 hours and my k/d increased from 3.80 to 3.82... but then a single 20 minute battle just blasted my k/d back to 3.80..  <_< cause CTF turned into a DM where half the players were one big team i wasn't part of  :rolleyes: 


when i first saw his idea i didn't agree because i know battles with friendly fire are more strategic.. and players need to have this option to practice for esports.. 

but now... as if there's ever any strategy among random players playing in a team. That option is only beneficial for clan battles and does far more destruction than anything for open battles so... I mean okay you dont have to join friendly fire battles if you don't want to but... simetimes you don't know someone is gonna sabotage, you play for 30 minutes and one of your teammates suddenly decides to kill you over and over. 


my idea is to make friendly fire option available only for clan battles. This way, saboteurs won't be so powerful and people will be more inclined to purchace clan lisences as they will now get an added privilege. maybe after matchmaing gets introduced and when private battles only give 1 exp per kill this option can also be added to private battles as well. 

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

Thanks for the feedback, but I wanna know if your opinion would differ if we could use that space for a better feature.

I would like to see fewer options so we can have more battles to join.

 

This option can stay for Private and Clan battles.

[lukey0 27,543]

It doesn't exist in many battles anyway...

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

It doesn't exist in many battles anyway...

If that statement were correct then why not remove it because it isn't a used option?

[lukey0 27,543]

If that statement were correct then why not remove it because it isn't a used option?

Why remove something for the sake of removing something? It's not like it's hurting anything by being an option. 

[Pyre 3,485]

I disagree with this idea being declined. 

I think there should be no being able to shoot someone on your team in NON pro battles.

People sabotage that way

Its only an option in PRO battles.

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

Why remove something for the sake of removing something? It's not like it's hurting anything by being an option. 

It's not removing for the sake of removing, the reasons are there.

 

Its only an option in PRO battles.

And many don't want that option.

[KariWolves2 82]

Its only an option in PRO battles.

Yeah, I understand what you mean

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

But then just don't join such games?

Read the rest of his post for the answer to your question.

 

I think there's no good reason to decline this.

[lukey0 27,543]

It's not removing for the sake of removing, the reasons are there.

 

And many don't want that option.

What reasons? That it's annoying. That's more of an opinion to the individual. Just avoid battles with the option enabled.

[pro_guy 553]

it is used in eSports, bad idea.

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

What reasons? That it's annoying. That's more of an opinion to the individual. Just avoid battles with the option enabled.

That's not the reason I'm talking about.

[pro_guy 553]

That's not the reason I'm talking about.

?

[lukey0 27,543]

That's not the reason I'm talking about.

Then which one?