Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Matchmaking is coming May 29th


r_Nives5
 Share

Recommended Posts

this is not true!
"

  • provide fair conditions for all players in the battle (nobody can predict what map will be next, who will be on the enemy team, what equipment to use);"

because i had on a batle where the opponent was 5  members of same clan! that means my team was weaker wit5h no organized players against an organized group... guess who won?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is the MatchMaking?  This is just getting dumped into a random battle.  It is not as effective as the idiotic Battle Button from before this ridiculous update.  

 

There are 23550 players online as I write this so there should be no trouble getting into a DM battle.  It took almost two minutes of waiting in queue.   The rank brackets were WIDER than normal battles were previously.  In this DM match there was a rank 10, a couple of rank 11s, and all the way up to rank 20.  That's 11 different ranks in the same battle!  What is balanced about that?  It was smaller rank brackets just by picking a random DM battle from the Battle List...and without the wait in queue!

 

I played a few more team battles and had long waits in queue and got tossed into the middle of battles on the losing side more often than getting to start a battle from the beginning.  Any feeling of "team" that there ever was is completely lost now.  The shortened duration, the new reward distribution, and no continuation on a map make for zero team bonding.  I never even noticed who or what kind of equipment was on my own team.  The community aspect of Tanki can't thrive or even continue in this environment.  

 

This is an idiotic system and needs to get fixed and do what it promised or, even better, needs to be scrapped and the intrusive updates that were put in place to facilite MatchMaking removed.  if this so called MatchMaking doesn't get improved greatly or rescinded completely, I doubt I will bother with Tanki too much anymore...what a waste of my time

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, devs put this to a vote!

 

See how many want compulsory matchmaking vs. how many want the battle list available?  

 

Open it up for a week, one vote per user/account.

 

Do you want to make your customers happy?  Do what your customers want.

 

Let's have a VOTE!!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What game mode were you playing and how high was your battle score?

 

Good question, you should definitely receive score for capturing points, since that is the main objective in the mode. I'll forward the issue, thanks!

 

TDM. My score was approx 220. I checked the winning team, and players with the same score had pulled in 240-300 crystals. IMO that wasn’t the evening of distribution I expected.

 

I also noticed that in CP I was not getting score for capping points. Glad that is being reported.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

ADDING more -- turrets, hulls, paints, maps choices --- ALWAYS BETTER.

 

While I like the principle, we don't need more turrets. TO is running out of original ideas, and most of what is floating around the forums is either poor or a rehashed pre-existing turret. I mean, Juggernaut is a 2 rails and a twins shotgun married together. As for hulls, I believe we have too many, but can concede that we have just enough to allow for "player choice". Maps, while I would love new maps, I just wish the other 70+ maps were rotated into play, as you stated above. Also, newer, brighter graphics (replace the old tiles with updated ones, not asking for a totally revamped graphics package) would serve as a decent facelift and make the game look new. Paints, meh. I would like more brighter colors, but I refuse to spend for them, and sorta feel hat they are a distraction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, devs put this to a vote!

 

See how many want compulsory matchmaking vs. how many want the battle list available?  

 

Open it up for a week, one vote per user/account.

 

Do you want to make your customers happy?  Do what your customers want.

 

Let's have a VOTE!!

DEMOCRACY!!

 

XD

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least I get to keep the choice of whether or not I want to spend money on this game. Can't take that away from me.

Trust me, they can, if you play. You cant kill if you dont pay!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Memes of tankionline- Balanced.

 

DQ7ffEgBQqi1cCjIeiWsEA.png

 

Nives, whenever you talk about Tanki, please never use words such as Balanced or Fair, because we both know, its never gonna happen.

 

Umm... you should have m2s at that rank.

Edited by Guest
spoiler added

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Memes of tankionline- Balanced.

 

 

Yeah, they start that way with Colonel. tank shot itself in the foot

Making it so M3s can only be purchased starting at marshal in 2017: fine

Promptly letting people purchase garage and shop kits of m3s at Colonel: completely broke the system. I feel the system is designed to slightly increase the number of tankers who either throw down $5 for some extra ◊◊◊ to get a garage kit or big bucks for a shop kit. I have 2 lower accounts who are on track to have m2.10s before colonel and have sufficient funds to buy a m3 garage kit at that rank. Me, a 3 star, 150kXP from marshal, can't justify to myself getting a m3 kit, so I am stuck at m2.10 for "doing it right".

 

Edit:Sam you can;t get Hunter M2 until Captain, but I agree in principle, m1.10s at least. 

Edit 2 ignore stupid statement above he is a captain my bad

Edited by bozo88

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Umm... you should have m2s at that rank.

He is a whole 6 ranks lower than the Lieutenant-General though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point its just a meme... I am not ranting just accept it the devs don't give a penny about the EN community they don't care bout our feedback anyways.(want proof go check the number of forum topics that have been under review for years, many addressing key issues with the game that have lot of people backing them).

 

And now they come up with this update which even i thought would be really good and would make non pro games a bit fun atleast since we are forced to do missions in them and they claimed this is something we have been working on for a very long time. Jack i still remember the feedback from last time they had an open test for this and did they do anything about the major issues we pointed out ? absolutely nothing.

 

Major Issues:-

 

1. Players with extremely low ranks can enter high rank games. an easy way to mimic this glitch is to inv a low ranker to your group and join a match.

2. Whats even the point of matchmaking if you keep groups. 4 players of a drugger clan against random players of random ranks. Most kids run on entering and thanks to matchmaking neither can we call backup nor can anyone join to help so have to play with few allies.

 

At this point this just seems like a rant and a waste of my time... no one with enough power will read this anyways cus face it the developers just dont care bout customer feedback. If they did the game would never reach this point.

Edited by BabyG0D
please refrain to use inappropriate words
  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is a whole 6 ranks lower than the Lieutenant-General though.

Still, he should have m2s, rather than m0s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

might have hit TDM instead of DM seeing there right underneath each other and is confusing if you don't spend the extra time to check.not good location for them to be together . and then it could have been Dm i hit..

 

also another unbalanced match. they had no chance to even get any kills.

h8p3QI1.jpg

Edited by Bydo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hit DM battle and got this battle instead..

 

also another unbalanced match. they had no chance to even get any kills.

 

h8p3QI1.jpg

 

The only thing i see out of place is the WO4, with that exception, under pre MM system such a battle could and did happen, often.

Edited by Viking4s
spoiler added

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, they start that way with Colonel. tank shot itself in the foot

Making it so M3s can only be purchased starting at marshal in 2017: fine

Promptly letting people purchase garage and shop kits of m3s at Colonel: completely broke the system. I feel the system is designed to slightly increase the number of tankers who either throw down $5 for some extra ◊◊◊ to get a garage kit or big bucks for a shop kit. I have 2 lower accounts who are on track to have m2.10s before colonel and have sufficient funds to buy a m3 garage kit at that rank. Me, a 3 star, 150kXP from marshal, can't justify to myself getting a m3 kit, so I am stuck at m2.10 for "doing it right".

 

Edit:Sam you can;t get Hunter M2 until Captain, but I agree in principle, m1.10s at least. 

Edit 2 ignore stupid statement above he is a captain my bad

yes, but look at my tank... Im m0.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Tanki had a rival game and they wanted to destroy Tanki, They would have sent this update proposal via a black sheep in Tanki. And the black sheep will be like  :)  ;)  :P  :D  :lol:  B)  :ph34r:  now. 

So this is how it ends... sad

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...