Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

About how to promote and support a fair-play game style


 Share

Recommended Posts

The Title needs to be modified to include "XP" - otherwise it is very misleading.

 

And make your June 12 update in OP bold and/or a different color.

 

Your frustration with commentators who don't understand your intent is misplaced.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Title needs to be modified to include "XP" - otherwise it is very misleading.

 

 

I won't include "xp" in title. In the strategies will find in the future it can be a dozen things to do about it, so the title will stay as it is.

I don't like text formatting, it hurts my eyes as I access forum from different devices. There's no rush for people to read the topic, think and reply.

 

I did not ignore you.. I liked your post to show you i seen it. I just need time to think about it. Acrtually i already have an idea i'm just trying to figure out how to explain  it in english

nice try quoting part of the whole post.

 

          Well at least now I know you're thinking about a reply, I fail when I try to assume things other people think. (jk everybody fails)  :lol:  :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't include "xp" in title. In the strategies will find in the future it can be a dozen things to do about it, so the title will stay as it is.

I don't like text formatting, it hurts my eyes as I access forum from different devices. There's no rush for people to read the topic, think and reply.

okay i thought about how you could do it but in the end i think you should just do excatly what my leader did to form the clan.

 

So basically you make a clan with people with requirements i will list below. It doesn't necessarily have to be a clan, just a group of people who will listen to you. and whenever you see an unfair battle you ask them to join that battle and do the takeover.

 

In order for those wrongdoers to know that you're doing it in the name of justice and against opression, maybe when the takeover is starting the members can say in the chat some slogan in both Russian or english or whatever language those bullies seem to speak. One example.. "The evil you've done, the evil you are... It all ends here. Prepare, for Gissma's RETRIBUTION!"

 

Now tha basic requirement for these people would be that they are active at the times you play. You'll need enough members to be online and ready to help you at all times. you will be the one who decides whether or not players on a team the battle are really bullying, and only whenyou have decided then you will summon this "clan"

 

But of course,, in order for them to do a takeover, there's more.

 

1. teamplayers. can't focus only on their own score or k/d

2. experts in DM. because when you're getting spawn killed good DM players are the best to get the team out of it.

3. able to fight most players with equipment superior to theirs.

4. for drug battles i suppose they'll need trooper drones.

5. able to top the scoreboards of most battles they play in. This is very important as there's limited places in the battle to join. if you let any weak player in he'll be taking the spot a stronger player could have taken. Also, if the team needs to be rescued chances are that the people aren't that strong to begin with.

6. can't be the kind to leave when losing or go on pause mode when spawn killed.

 

 

Now every month based on their performances and stuff like how ofte they help you and how helpful they turn out to be you could reward them. So maybe if someone only comes to you once you can tell him to get out. but someone who comes to you all the time and suscessfully overtakes many battles then you could give him a big reward.

 

I suggest that they should get higher value rewards if they choose stuff that would benefit them in battles over cosmetics. This is to encourage them to get the former kind so that they'll be able to better serve you.

 

 

 

Edited by GuidoFawkes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't include "xp" in title. In the strategies will find in the future it can be a dozen things to do about it, so the title will stay as it is.

I don't like text formatting, it hurts my eyes as I access forum from different devices. There's no rush for people to read the topic, think and reply.

Text-formatting hurts your eyes?  :huh:  

 

Was not suggesting it be day-glow.  Increase the font size and make it bold. Not difficult.

 

So... is this supposed to be about XP or not?

If include other than XP then anyone classifying self-destructing as "unfair" or "sabotage" is incorrect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So you just bully back to the bullies ?

how does that become fair ?

 

So what is the difference between a bully [as you said] from a group of player's doing take over

If you just answer this , i will agree to your post

 

i like the idea you have come up with , the only problem is my question answer me clear  :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

okay i thought about how you could do it but in the end i think you should just do excatly what my leader did to form the clan.

 

 

 

          Thank you! There is a lot to talk about your ideas. I really believe there would not be needed to give higher recompense to "buyers" to join battles and make justice there. There are such powerful clans in TO and they don't do it. Buyers are interested in winning on their own and even at cost of their friendships, also are interested to spend money by dropping mines on parkour to do easy kills, to gain "fame" among the others players. Most of them don't have another vision about what they would be able to do (meaning "good" things as well). I don't want to do a "Cosa Nostra" type of justice. Simple because imo everything will fail when is about making justice in supplies wars. There is no such thing. This is why I look more at kind and patient "education" at low ranks in non supplies battles, rather than public type of  ad hoc"revenges", which is not even going to lead to friendships, nor success, but to even more injustice fights, more envy and more hate. I would have already done that by now if I truly believed it could have been a positive way to accomplish anything. 

          L.E. I have a charity where I help players who are not buyers and they need help, how am I supposed to join with others buyers and hit them only because the only strategy available they found to win against others buyers, is to mult? I don't want to kill / destroy people who mult and unfair play, I want to show them what is a good way to make it on the long run, then they will have two options available to think about and they will chose the best one.

Edited by Wes.Is.Just.A.Digger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you just bully back to the bullies ?

how does that become fair ?

 

So what is the difference between a bully [as you said] from a group of player's doing take over

If you just answer this , i will agree to your post

 

i like the idea you have come up with , the only problem is my question answer me clear  :)

vigilante justice. somepeople believe in it, some people don't.

 

 

          Thank you! There is a lot to talk about your ideas. I really believe there would not be needed to give higher recompense to "buyers" to join battles and make justice there. There are such powerful clans in TO and they don't do it. Buyers are interested in winning on their own and even at cost of their friendships, also are interested to spend money by dropping mines on parkour to do easy kills, to gain "fame" among the others players. Most of them don't have another vision about what they would be able to do (meaning "good" things as well). I don't want to do a "Cosa Nostra" type of justice. Simple because imo everything will fail when is about making justice in supplies wars. There is no such thing. This is why I look more at kind and patient "education" at low ranks in non supplies battles, rather than public type of  ad hoc"revenges", which is not even going to lead to friendships, nor success, but to even more injustice fights, more envy and more hate. I would have already done that by now if I truly believed it could have been a positive way to accomplish anything. 

          L.E. I have a charity where I help players who are not buyers and they need help, how am I supposed to join with others buyers and hit them only because the only strategy available they found to win against others buyers, is to mult? I don't want to kill / destroy people who mult and fair play, I want to show them what is a good way to make it on the long run, then they will have two options available to think about and they will chose the best one.

okay...

but anyway it doesn't necessarily have to be buyers who can only join that "clan". When i just joined I only had one m1 turret and one m1 hull.

 

The requirements aree just to make sure that the people you send in can do the job. doesn't matter whether or not they buy.

 

also I'm sure buyers can make more by simply joining winning sides instead of joining the losing one against people with better equipment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

vigilante justice. somepeople believe in it, some people don't.

 

 

okay...

but anyway it doesn't necessarily have to be buyers who can only join that "clan". When i just joined I only had one m1 turret and one m1 hull.

 

The requirements aree just to make sure that the people you send in can do the job. doesn't matter whether or not they buy.

 

also I'm sure buyers can make more by simply joining winning sides instead of joining the losing one against people with better equipment

 

          We can try to test to do that by simply having a bunch of people sticking together, join maps and fight (or mult against other mult  :ph34r:  ). This requires a precise friend list, first of all, who will totally understand what we are talking about here. And having it done by no recompenses, at least until the concept is tested enough. So, where do we start?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

          We can try to test to do that by simply having a bunch of people sticking together, join maps and fight (or mult against other mult  :ph34r:  ). This requires a precise friend list, first of all, who will totally understand what we are talking about here. And having it done by no recompenses, at least until the concept is tested enough. So, where do we start?

Everyone in EN hates me here, so i was thinking you could be the one to find the people cause you're so well loved.

 

but if i were to do it I could try asking some russians i know. If you want I'll ask if anyof them are interested to answer your call when you need them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

vigilante justice. somepeople believe in it, some people don't.

 

Ok bro np

i got what you meant now 

 

Well wana team up with me ?

i have m3 rico now  :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone in EN hates me here, so i was thinking you could be the one to find the people cause you're so well loved.

 

but if i were to do it I could try asking some russians i know. If you want I'll ask if anyof them are interested to answer your call when you need them.

We don't hate you.  We just think you're nuts. :P

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone in EN hates me here, so i was thinking you could be the one to find the people cause you're so well loved.

 

but if i were to do it I could try asking some russians i know. If you want I'll ask if anyof them are interested to answer your call when you need them.

          I don't hate you. I have many haters as well. But I stay chill coz they eventually will find out later more about me, e.g. I'm harmless.  :rolleyes:  ^.^ 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok bro np

i got what you meant now 

 

Well wana team up with me ?

i have m3 rico now  :)

:) well i can't play much at the moment, but i suppose i could help manage a takeoversquad just like how I'm still managing a clan.. 

 

but anyway I'll send you a friend request and monintor you  :ph34r: 

 

 

 

We don't hate you.  We just think you're nuts. :P

maybe you don't but... i know a lot do. and I'm okay with it. 

 

          I don't hate you. I have many haters as well. But I stay chill coz they eventually will find out later more about me, e.g. I'm harmless.  :rolleyes:  ^.^ 

well thanks but... 

 

actually people start to hate me more after they find out I'm the opposite of harmless :ph34r:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:) well i can't play much at the moment, but i suppose i could help manage a takeoversquad just like how I'm still managing a clan.. 

 

but anyway I'll send you a friend request and monintor you  :ph34r:

Ok

i am harmless  :)

you are a good guy , dont let anyone change you

 

we all have right to express ourselves no need to be shy  ;)

 

@Gen

How about weekly xp cups 

for one month 

and at the end of month The Fair Play  Award Of The Month aka TFPAOTM is given to the best good guy

Edited by gokuMI6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think of a better acronym.

Lol

ik its not good , i just wrote the full name and typed all the caps at end

 

Can you suggest one ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can try your best on changing the M2 ranks' mentality, but the reality is they don't gain that type of maturity until they enter the more mature battles. And by that I mean the battles when someone says "stop" everyone stops ect...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't hate you. I have many haters as well. But I stay chill coz they eventually will find out later more about me, e.g. I'm harmless.  :rolleyes:  ^.^

 

And also your the @Sweetest person I’ve ever seen :) because @You got me a rename @Pass :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can try your best on changing the M2 ranks' mentality, but the reality is they don't gain that type of maturity until they enter the more mature battles. And by that I mean the battles when someone says "stop" everyone stops ect...

I have met M3 guys also who does that

Some people dont understand what Stop/cton means

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most/Many people in the M3 ranks do. Especially Russians...idk why but they do it.

From experience, i have seen that It's more likely for players who are pro to stop when teams are unbalanced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...