Declined open the battle list containg non pro battles

[jones590 1]

I and many more players whom i know have difficulty in completing missions in some maps because they lag too much. I preffer that battle list should be opened which have non pro battles so players can go in the map which they like and it donot lag in their computers.players often become bore because of playing in the same map for so much time every day.

 

[lordmostafa 3,821]

Declined.

 

This defeats the purpose of matchmaking - to match players that have similar strength with each other for a fair battle. If you have issues with lag, I suggest reading the following article from the help site: How do I raise my FPS?

[CabbageRoll 3,018]

This defeats the purpose of matchmaking - to match players that have similar strength with each other for a fair battle.

Do developers even know meaning of balance? Yesterday i were in 3vs8 for last 5 minutes. Matchmaking feeds one team while leaving other one hopeless. Match becomes 3vs6 and guess what? Matchmaking sends players to bigger team. You can either fix this non-sense or return non-pro battle list.

[Maf 32,324]

Do developers even know meaning of balance? Yesterday i were in 3vs8 for last 5 minutes. Matchmaking feeds one team while leaving other one hopeless. Match becomes 3vs6 and guess what? Matchmaking sends players to bigger team. You can either fix this non-sense or return non-pro battle list.

That does seem like an actual issue, but let's face it - it's unlikely that anyone would join the losing outnumbered team with under 5 minutes left even if the battle was available to join via battle list.

[CabbageRoll 3,018]

That does seem like an actual issue, but let's face it - it's unlikely that anyone would join the losing outnumbered team with under 5 minutes left even if the battle was available to join via battle list.

But if we have battle list no one can join the bigger team. While matchmaking exactly fills one then only if it has 8 players it throws players to opposite one. PLease fix this non sense

[r_Spytank2 129]

Declined.

 

This defeats the purpose of matchmaking - to match players that have similar strength with each other for a fair battle. 

Matchmaking's purpose was defeated to begin with.

[BlackEliteEnemy2 250]

Declined.

 

This defeats the purpose of matchmaking - to match players that have similar strength with each other for a fair battle. If you have issues with lag, I suggest reading the following article from the help site: How do I raise my FPS?

Oh really?

Fair battle results in:

TDM -> 100 - 15

CTF -> 7 - 0 in 5 minutes

CP -> 50 - 2

RGB -> 7-0

ASL (if red wins): 100-7, (if blue wins) 0-100.

 

This happens in 8 / 10 battles. I can provide you screenshots, and I will, unfortunately, I don't have them RN, but I'll have them till tommorow.

 

And once you are lucky enough to join pretty balanced battle, it is 3 mins before end (I usually stay till end in all battles), you have to leave, because guess what? You can't have rematch :D

That does seem like an actual issue, but let's face it - it's unlikely that anyone would join the losing outnumbered team with under 5 minutes left even if the battle was available to join via battle list.

That is an issue -> Fill 1 team then another, rather than put 1 player in team A then another to B, or  (another solution) fill worse team, then better one.

 

 

Tell me, who would wait 1, 2 or 3 minutes to join a battle where everyone is his/her rank is the lowest?

If I wanted to quickly join a battle, I'd go to battle list, click on 1st battle that has 1 free spot and join it, I wouldn't mind is that winning team or losing team, is my rank highest or lowest. At least, I wouldn't wait several minutes, and I'd possibly join my favourite map. If I want to search a battle I like, I would still wait several minutes, but at least I would be happy in battle  I am. Before MMS was introduced, there were battles that lasted for several hours. How? Once battle ended and losing team "lost" 4 / 5 / 6 players, better players in winner's team went to losing team. You can't say me that was never in that battle. Oh, actually you will, cuz you have to protect devs with their stupid ideas. Many battles had comebacks. (ctf example) After 7 minutes: 4-0, at end 5-8. Why? Someone strong joined losing team and made it win. Now you can't have comebacks (or if you do, that's 1 battle per day) because you just lose will to play when you see battle after 2 minutes 5-0. With battle list, if someone wanted to join losing team, he / she would know he / she joins losing team and will actually try to do something.

 

Give out a pool: Do you want battle list or no? If 50% says yes, then add it back. I don't see why tanki can't proceed in developing with battle list.

[GorgoBlesk 831]

That blue text is really hard to read, this should be better xD

 

Matchmaking and open battle list just do not like each other, they will be never put together.

Such color, much editing...

(look closely at this gray text, it is lighter than normal one xD)

[BlackEliteEnemy2 250]

That blue text is really hard to read, this should be better xD

 

Matchmaking and open battle list just do not like each other, they will be never put together.

 

 

Such color, much editing...

(look closely at this gray text, it is lighter than normal one xD)

Edited xD

 

They CAN be put together, but TO devs don't know want to think about how to .