Future of T.O - Your opinion

[foxer_XXX 135]

But as I said, they are just trying to do what you ask of them, but you ask so many crazy things and change what you want on a regular basis that what you did want is what they implemented, but you don't necessarily want it anymore, so you think they are making bad updates, but they wouldn't have been considered bad if you got the update just a tad bit earlier.

[foxer_XXX 135]

And if you really think that they are making bad and poor updates, then why do you even bother playing, much less talk about it - if you are admitting to the game being a waste of time, then why waste your time yourself?

[DieselPlatinum 5,121]

I really think the devs could make this game great again. They just need to start ignoring the cryers that complain that the game is P2W. And start listening to actual reasonable players.

[wolverine848 13,097]

6 hours ago, foxer_XXX said:

And if you really think that they are making bad and poor updates, then why do you even bother playing, much less talk about it - if you are admitting to the game being a waste of time, then why waste your time yourself?

Where did I say it was a waste of time?

I'm just refuting your theory that all the troubles come from the players.  It is just not true.

 

We continue to post here in the hopes the Devs will actually listen to us and stop messing up a good game.

[123tim456back 195]

12 hours ago, foxer_XXX said:

I have very mixed views about Tanki Online... Awhile back, I loved the game, and then it started degrading with all the updates. Now people are saying "All the Devs just want money, so their making updates that make the game more pay to win." (or something like that). But, I just realized awhile back, that it's not as bad as it seems - I mean, when criticism or negative comments come from players to the game, it's these huge paragraphs of points after points after points... When most of them don't even check out what's actually going on. You know how everyone complained about the Module update? Well I'm quite happy about it - and here's why: Before the update, I didn't have the Gauss turret, and getting the M2 at the time was around 70-90k crystals. I only had around 40k. After the update, however, I could go all the way to Mk3 before running out of crystals - which tells you something. It means that players are so used to bad updates, and bad gameplay, that when they here of an update they all comment something negative - they don't even test it for themselves. And anything positive that is said will be rejected and refuted by those players. A lot of them just say something negative because a lot of other people do, which is a fallacy - called the Ad populum fallacy - and it literally means "To the people". That's also something you see in modern society as a whole. It's essentially "All of them are doing it, so we're going to do it too. Because if so many of them are doing it, it couldn't be wrong, could it?" And therefore Tanki Online gets so many false and negative comments, that it is looked upon badly by its players, even though there is goodness and a good purpose in the true heart of the games updates. Now, some of you will be thinking "Yes - that purpose is to take our money and to suck us dry! All these updates are making it (the game) a money sucker." However, do any of you actually know why they make updates? Well, the simple answer is to make you happy. But then again, a lot of you are saying it's making you sadder, or even angrier. But, they get their ideas from you - they all look at what you want, what you've been posting, and trying to do it to the best of their abilities. However, you guys are so mixed up and just saying so many random things now that the Devs are really having a hard time keeping up - first it's this, then two days later you want the opposite - and the Devs are just going back and forth and back and forth... And you all blame it on the Devs, when really it's just you who brings everything crashing down. That's really all I can say, because everything else that is to be said is something that I cannot be said by me, because it's not in my place to say it. Good luck to you all, and have a great and happy rest of the year!

Most players will post negative comments, some reasonable, others stupid.  This is because updates are more negative than positive, and we know the devs can do better.  

 

For example, the execution of the Mk update was terrible, as m2.10s got changed into mk7 instead of mk6.10.  

 

Its not as bad as we make it seem, as the game is still playable and relatively enjoyable, but playing positive comments all the time is completely useless.  

 

Criticism does not always mean feedback, but constructive criticism does.  Player feedback is what the game needs, and we are providing that, yet not much is being done that the players agree is a problem.  

[foxer_XXX 135]

11 hours ago, 123tim456back said:

Most players will post negative comments, some reasonable, others stupid.  This is because updates are more negative than positive, and we know the devs can do better.  

 

For example, the execution of the Mk update was terrible, as m2.10s got changed into mk7 instead of mk6.10.  

 

Its not as bad as we make it seem, as the game is still playable and relatively enjoyable, but playing positive comments all the time is completely useless.  

 

Criticism does not always mean feedback, but constructive criticism does.  Player feedback is what the game needs, and we are providing that, yet not much is being done that the players agree is a problem.  

That I can agree with - however the problem is that most of it is criticism, not constructive criticism - or feedback, if you will. And then as you said they can be just nonsense, or as you put it, stupid, and I think that the Devs do make poor decisions - they need to be able to determine the nonsense and reasonable comments for themselves, otherwise this game will land exactly where Tanki X did... Which isn't something we want. Like @DieselPlatinum said, "I 

really think the devs could make this game great again. They just need to start ignoring the cryers that complain that the game is P2W. And start listening to actual reasonable players." - I think that is a valid point, as I said earlier, the Devs need to determine for themselves the difference between nonsense and reasonable comments.

[foxer_XXX 135]

12 hours ago, wolverine848 said:

Where did I say it was a waste of time?

I'm just refuting your theory that all the troubles come from the players.  It is just not true.

 

We continue to post here in the hopes the Devs will actually listen to us and stop messing up a good game.

They do listen - it's just a matter of who they listen to, and who they ignore. Because although a lot of people give criticism and nonsense, that can very much seem like it's reasonable and valid... All one would have to do is misinterpret something that was said and then they go down the wrong path.