Challenges are here!

[OKDad70 862]

The Stars threshold is bad. It needs to go. The argument was to not reward inactive players just sitting in the battle to get a Star. That isn't what is happening. Active, honest players are being deprived. It is impossible to reach the threshold in some situations no matter how good the player is. If a player doesn't have at least six minutes, it is almost certain there will be no Star reward. Battles can get over faster than that. Often, players are stuffed into hopless battles with as little as 60 seconds remaining.

 

It is bogus. Tanki is actively harming regular legitimate players with the Stars threshold.

[RIDDLER_8 5,553]

I have 333 stars so far.

 

How did you guys managed to earn 2000 stars in 1 week?

[ByeByeBye 1,747]

The Stars threshold is bad. It needs to go. The argument was to not reward inactive players just sitting in the battle to get a Star. That isn't what is happening. Active, honest players are being deprived. It is impossible to reach the threshold in some situations no matter how good the player is. If a player doesn't have at least six minutes, it is almost certain there will be no Star reward. Battles can get over faster than that. Often, players are stuffed into hopless battles with as little as 60 seconds remaining.

 

It is bogus. Tanki is actively harming regular legitimate players with the Stars threshold.

I agree that the threshold should be lowered.  What you say here is completely true.  I have done several full battles and not gotten 100 points because my teammates are constantly vanishing and the opposition is slaughtering.  I've also had it had games where my team is winning and by such a margin that there aren't enough targets still alive to make the 100 core.  It i annoying to play a full battle an get hosed out of at least one star. 

[ByeByeBye 1,747]

Usually I'm critical of Tanki since they just can't seem to o anything right, but I think they did an overall good job on this whole "Challenges".  In terms of marketing it is pretty brilliant since it is retroactive.  All players accrue level rewards.  Much later in the course of the time period, players are going to see what they already won and for buying the battle pass, they will get 3X their current hoard of rewards...going to moyivate a lot of player to buy the pass in the last couple of weeks I think...good marketing Tanki.

 

It seems to be pretty well structured and the quest for stars isn't causing as many problems with game-play as the "Stars Weeks" did.  All players will get ome nice prizes since the time frame is so long.  An players may be motivated to play more since that tasty next level prize is only a few star away.

 

This "Challenges" is a welcome addition to the game...good work Tanki.  Now clean up the myriad of idiotic updates and toxic changes to the game and Bob's your uncle.

[rus0806 265]

What are the 'Main' Missions?

[Retaliate 503]

What are the 'Main' Missions?

There will be standard task for all tankers with no dead lines. These might include tasks such as getting kills, playing battles, or delivering flags.  There will also be tasks for beginners, connect your email, play your first battle, purchase a turret, and so on. :) 

 

Was explained in V-LOG 196 

 

[OKDad70 862]

Usually I'm critical of Tanki since they just can't seem to o anything right, but I think they did an overall good job on this whole "Challenges". […] Now clean up the myriad of idiotic updates and toxic changes to the game and Bob's your uncle.

I reluctantly agree. While I'm down on Stars as a reward system, and I loath the Stars minimum threshold, I do think the Challenge is an overall good idea. It will reward the diligent with extra, and will approrpiately reward the more casual player. It rewards the free player, and handsomely rewards the players willing to part with a 5USD.

 

The Stars threshold is a sad insult to the players, especially those who are below average, either in skill or in interest. It is Tanki rudely snubbing players. Insult to injury at its most deplorable.

[rus0806 265]

 

Thanks!

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

Maybe in the future, if there's a future, Stars should be given this way, in team battles:

 

 

In DM it could be like this: 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.

 

Score of 1 - 50 = 1 star

 

Score of 0 = 0 stars

 

And the Star goals would be higher of course, an idea I have for this idea is 2000 Stars in 30 days.

Edited December 24, 2018 by r_Issimo2

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

5 is too much, with Premium it's 10.

[Pythor 1,354]

In my opinion.. everyone on the winning team should get one extra star.

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

5 is too much, with Premium it's 10.

The Star goals should be higher too.

 

I'd like to see 2500 Stars for 25 days, 42 days is too much.

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

I don't think 42 days is too much. It gives high chances to a lot of players.

 

So far I have around 100 stars. I can't play everyday, just like a lot of players.

 

2500 stars for 25 days, it's 100 stars per day dude. It's 20 battles finished in first position (with your proposition of 5 for the first player), in the winning team. Or 10 battles with Premium. It's, at least, 2 hours per day.

[N0iSE 222]

What I like about the Challenges is that it is not forcing you to grind all day to receive nice rewards. I believe this way is giving much more positive experience to gameplay. It is a challenging bonus on top of normal gaming. Ofcourse there are people no-lifing this kind of events. Let them be and I hope they have a nice life beside it. But for me -who cannot play everyday, I am very happy that I can do the challenges in my own tempo without having the feeling I'm missing out on everything.

[r_Issimo2 1,495]

I don't think 42 days is too much. It gives high chances to a lot of players.

 

So far I have around 100 stars. I can't play everyday, just like a lot of players.

 

2500 stars for 25 days, it's 100 stars per day dude. It's 20 battles finished in first position (with your proposition of 5 for the first player), in the winning team. Or 10 battles with Premium. It's, at least, 2 hours per day.

You're right, I did a wrong guesstimate.

 

I think 2000 in 30 days would be better, that means 13.3 battles with 5 stars per day, 16.6 with 4 stars, 22.2 with 3 stars, and 33.3 with 2 stars. Too much? Yes, but better than the current system of 15.8 battles with 3 stars per day, 23.8 with 2 stars, and 47.6 battles with 1 star.

[wolverine848 13,097]

In my opinion.. everyone on the winning team should get one extra star.

The rich get richer?  <_<

 

No one would stay on losing team.  As soon as team falls behind players will drop out.  This would ruin battles.

[Hancho 3,902]

In my opinion.. everyone on the winning team should get one extra star.

Why? Because your team won? But did you actually do any favour for the team? What happened to working hard for the first/second place to get those 6 stars? I've reached 1550 stars in a week - by simply becoming first 1st in each battle but the amount of talented players I have to face in the legend rank is insane, so many challenges to compete against the opponents, nightmare. 

[pringerfinger 934]

Why? Because your team won? But did you actually do any favour for the team? What happened to working hard for the first/second place to get those 6 stars? I've reached 1550 stars in a week - by simply becoming first 1st in each battle but the amount of talented players I have to face in the legend rank is insane, so many challenges to compete against the opponents, nightmare. 

yeah.....Same.....I get first all the time....in legend battles.....for sure....no doubt....

 

umm

 

 

Nahh....I get 2nd or 3rd all the time....who am I kidding.....

 

 

But like for real I get place in legend battles all the time. Even when I am in the winning team I feel like the whole enemy team is better than me lol.

[x_Sorinel_x 52]

Don't think I'm going to reach 2000 stars... So far I got 226 stars. 1774 stars left in 32 days, 55 each day.

[Hancho 3,902]

yeah.....Same.....I get first all the time....in legend battles.....for sure....no doubt....

 

umm

 

 

Nahh....I get 2nd or 3rd all the time....who am I kidding.....

 

 

But like for real I get place in legend battles all the time. Even when I am in the winning team I feel like the whole enemy team is better than me lol.

If you genuinely know how to properly earn points in battle then you will get first/second place in each battle - if not then you'll end up last, simple.  

[pringerfinger 934]

If you genuinely know how to properly earn points in battle then you will get first/second place in each battle - if not then you'll end up last, simple.  

Eee. Depends. For some reason I get place into all legend battles quite frequently. Most have m4 everything. I don't Understand why I am the only one there that isn't a legend. Maybe its because I have an M4 and some close to being M4s?  But hey. I'm Flattered....

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

146 stars so far, huhuhu.

[Viking4s 10,791]

I have 178 so far :)

But my niece got 100 in 3 days :) :wub:

[CaptainPetter 40]

finally something added to tanki to keep it a little less pay to win, thank you for that 1st container i got touch of chill paint!  :D

[ALEX22THEBEST 789]

Done 2.000+ Stars, thanks Tanki Online for event and awards!