Declined Module rebalancing

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

lol, no man no! they will NOT.

 

you can choose %50 %50 %50 if u want, your %10 MU won't go ok? 

 

We just won't use 3 modules %50 each, we will use 4 modules that equal to %150.

LOL what if we can reduce the module slots to 2 and have 75% of protections each? Overpowered.

[wolverine848 13,097]

on my other account i had only 1 triple module and after the modules update it got split into 3 modules...

 

 

when they introduce a new turret, everyone will have to buy it to use it. however, for this, people with more modules will be able to use it straight away whereas people like me will have to buy another module to start using it. even then, people with 14 modules will still be benefitting more with this new feature than someone with only 4 modules.

 

basically, making the modules system more useful will benefit people who invested in their modules more as compared to people who choose to invest their crystals in other things.

Your other account at what rank?  And what the heck are you spending crystals on?

If your account is Captain or above and you only have 3 modules you will have more issues than not being able to make use of a theoretical new update.

 

Yes - because that's where they chose to invest crystals.  Just like players that already own a turret can make use of an alteration that is just introduced for that turret. And those that don't have that turret have to buy it first.  See how that works?

 

And your last statement... how is it better?  Same total protection - just different arrangement.

 

I already put that. Read my con again. "Has to equip a specific turret to gain full protection." 

 

It's literally right there.

OK - similar con for each and they... cancel out???

 

What about the rest of my post?  You cherry-pick one part of it to reply to...

[Maf 32,326]

Alright, I'm done arguing about this and I recommend to everyone else here to stop as well. Seems like a pointless discussion.

[ZloyDanuJI 409]

Alright, I'm done arguing about this and I recommend to everyone else here to stop as well. Seems like a pointless discussion.

well, i'll take that as a... reccommendation. tell me when it turns to an order

 

 

Your other account at what rank?  And what the heck are you spending crystals on?

If your account is Captain or above and you only have 3 modules you will have more issues than not being able to make use of a theoretical new update.

legend. i don't really earn a lot of crystals because i reached that rank years ago back whe everyone could only afford 1 turret, 1 hull and 1 module...

 

Yes - because that's where they chose to invest crystals.  Just like players that already own a turret can make use of an alteration that is just introduced for that turret. And those that don't have that turret have to buy it first.  See how that works?

that decision was made when modules weren't such a good investment. this update will make investing in modules a better investment. basically punishing me for something i did in the past simply because i wasn't in control of what will happen in the future.

 

And your last statement... how is it better?  Same total protection - just different arrangement.

if it's really the same then why bother with this idea?

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

Alright, I'm done arguing about this and I recommend to everyone else here to stop as well. Seems like a pointless discussion.

No.......

[loginci 877]

LOL what if we can reduce the module slots to 2 and have 75% of protections each? Overpowered.

no, the max. amount is %50. You can't use %75

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

no, the max. amount is %50. You can't use %75

That would be overpowered?

[loginci 877]

That would be overpowered?

no?

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

no?

Oh ok.

 

But in your opinion, which module system would you prefer? My idea, Maf's or the current system? Be honest plz.

[GorgoBlesk 831]

Oh ok.

 

But in your opinion, which module system would you prefer? My idea, Maf's or the current system? Be honest plz.

Do not forget my idea.

 

M0 - 5%

M1 - 10%

M2 - 15%

M3 - 20%

M4 - 25%

 

There could be more slots if modules were weak like this. Buyers would stop dominating battles via modules.

[wolverine848 13,097]

Do not forget my idea.

 

M0 - 5%

M1 - 10%

M2 - 15%

M3 - 20%

M4 - 25%

 

There could be more slots if modules were weak like this. Buyers would stop dominating battles via modules.

Is that stock value or max value?

[GorgoBlesk 831]

Is that stock value or max value?

Stock value. Except M4, of course. 25% is max and nobody would have more than 25%.

[wolverine848 13,097]

Stock value. Except M4, of course. 25% is max and nobody would have more than 25%.

Yikes that's a huge nerf...   I invested a LOT of crystals on a lot of modules.

 

In one swoop that destroys any advantage I might have over players who chose not to invest in modules. Maybe they spent crystals on hull upgrades or drones.  Now that puts me at a disadvantage compared to them.

 

And in legends battles... that 25% protection will do basically nothing versus turrets like Firebird.  Anything less than heavy hull will die every time.

[GorgoBlesk 831]

Yikes that's a huge nerf... I invested a LOT of crystals on a lot of modules.

 

In one swoop that destroys any advantage I might have over players who chose not to invest in modules. Maybe they spent crystals on hull upgrades or drones. Now that puts me at a disadvantage compared to them.

 

And in legends battles... that 25% protection will do basically nothing versus turrets like Firebird. Anything less than heavy hull will die every time.

What about 5-10-15-25-35?

[wolverine848 13,097]

What about 5-10-15-25-35?

A bit better - but - would have to be at least 4 modules allowed ... 4 x 35 = 140.  Still less total protection than we have now.

 

And m2 ... going from a useful 25% down to 15%... not at all worth 100k.

 

Don't forget alterations like heavy capacitors.  That +30% would make even stock m3 protection useless - though HC is available at m2.

There's no point in buying long-range module if you can't prevent a one-shot-kill with it.

[loginci 877]

Oh ok.

 

But in your opinion, which module system would you prefer? My idea, Maf's or the current system? Be honest plz.

Maf's system. Need an explanation? 

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

Maf's system. Need an explanation? 

Yes.

 

 

Do not forget my idea.

 

M0 - 5%

M1 - 10%

M2 - 15%

M3 - 20%

M4 - 25%

 

There could be more slots if modules were weak like this. Buyers would stop dominating battles via modules.

Of course I did not forget the idea. Only when combined with my idea... better.

[loginci 877]

Yes.

 

 

Okay. Here's why I support Maf at his idea:

 

The update will decrease the difference between buyers and non-buyers. We all know it's pretty hard to get a %50 module, while some people already got them for almost free (an example goes to Zeus, which had %50 protection from firebird and its price was 250k, considering you bought it on sale, it was meant to be 125k.). 

 

In case the update me and Maf want will get released, we will be able to use %150 modules in total even if we don't have all %50 modules. And nothing will happen to %50 modules as well, they will still be as strong as now, which would be the choice of buyers.

[GorgoBlesk 831]

There's no point in buying long-range module if you can't prevent a one-shot-kill with it.

The whole point of Shaft is to 1-shot enemies. Rail can 1-shot only light hulls (medium with HC alt), Thunder and Smoky do it rarely.

 

I use M2 Titan Smoky so I do not use Shaft, Smoky and Thunder modules to prevent being 1-shot but to win longer fights. Incendiary alt helps me a lot.

[wolverine848 13,097]

The whole point of Shaft is to 1-shot enemies. Rail can 1-shot only light hulls (medium with HC alt), Thunder and Smoky do it rarely.

 

I use M2 Titan Smoky so I do not use Shaft, Smoky and Thunder modules to prevent being 1-shot but to win longer fights. Incendiary alt helps me a lot.

Having guaranteed 1-shot kills on light or medium hulls would be ridiculous. CTF would end 0-0 all the time. B-O-R-I-N-G.

Already happens in lower ranks where protection is very low or non-existent.

Shaft module was first one I MU-ed to 31%.

 

You use shaft module because one-and-one-half scoped shots would finish you off otherwise.

 

Incendiary is it's own issues - two damage-types in one turret... another reason why we need 4-protection modules.

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

Okay. Here's why I support Maf at his idea:

 

The update will decrease the difference between buyers and non-buyers. We all know it's pretty hard to get a %50 module, while some people already got them for almost free (an example goes to Zeus, which had %50 protection from firebird and its price was 250k, considering you bought it on sale, it was meant to be 125k.). 

 

In case the update me and Maf want will get released, we will be able to use %150 modules in total even if we don't have all %50 modules. And nothing will happen to %50 modules as well, they will still be as strong as now, which would be the choice of buyers.

Dang... then you did not like mine.... Problem.... module would still be expensive.