invalid Bronze Tier for Challenges and Ranks

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Challenges are great mission adventures for players. However, I have noticed that there is something missing in challenges. Mission challenges must introduce a new feature. That is a bronze tier. The bronze tier would consist of earning rewards that are half the amount of the silver tier.

 

Tiers unlocked by ranks:

 

To make challenges more interesting for players, tiers should be unlocked by the number of ranks.

 

For low ranks, the bronze tier must be the only tier available for low rank players. Low rank players would not be able to complete challenges in the silver or gold tiers.

 

For medium rank players, the silver rank tiers would be suitable for them to complete. Middle rank players would be able to complete tiers in both the silver and bronze tier.

 

For high rank players, the gold tier would be accessible without the need of a stars pass. The high rank players would be able to complete challenges in the bronze, silver and gold tier. Players in the high rank category would still be able to buy a stars pass to only earn the double the amount of stars.

 

The challenges mission changes would make it possible for high rank players to able to participate in the gold tier with the need to buy a stars pass. The number of stars earned would be the same as for silver and bronze tiers. However, the gold tier players that chooses to buy the stars pass would earn double the amount of stars as usual.

 

The good thing about having three categories in the for mission challenges is that players can earn rewards in suitable sizes according to their ranks.

 

The battle pass would be purchasable, as usual, for players of any rank. From Recruit to Legend, players would need to buy a stars battle pass to earn double the amount of stars in battles. The battle pass would only remain for the current challenge only, whatever your rank. Your rank does not limit the time you own the pass, nor the stars you earn. Whatever position you finish any battle in any mode, 1st or last place, players will always earn double the amount of stars, as promised by me. The cost to buy a stars pass would be different at every rank, so for every rank that players progress, the stars pass would become a little more expensive.

 

Tier rank limits:

 

1. Recruit to Sergeant Major ------------------------ Bronze Tier.

 

2. Warrant Officer 1 to Colonel --------------------- Silver Tier (players can complete bronze tier at the same time).

 

3. Brigadier to Legend -------------------------------- Gold tier. Players unlock gold tier for free, but earn the regular amount of stars. To earn double stars in the gold tier, players are required to buy the Stars Pass.

 

I hope you like and accept my idea.

 

Thank you.

[Maf 32,337]

Valid

 

So you're basically asking to reduce the rewards for lower ranked players and increase them for higher ranks? It has some logic to it in the sense that high ranks should be getting more stuff than lower ranks, but at the same time most players would not approve of such a change.

 

 

 

2. Warrant Officer 1 to Colonel --------------------- Silver Tier (players can complete bronze tier at the same time).

 

3. Brigadier to Legend -------------------------------- Gold tier. Players unlock gold tier for free, but earn the regular amount of stars. To earn double stars in the gold tier, players are required to buy the Stars Pass.

In order for this to make sense economically, the Battle Pass would still be required to purchase, at any rank. You need to change it.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Yes, of course Maf. I agree with you. The battle pass needs to be purchasable at any rank. Sorry, I forgot to mention about that.

[loginci 877]

Under review

 

So you're basically asking to reduce the rewards for lower ranked players and increase them for higher ranks? It has some logic to it in the sense that high ranks should be getting more stuff than lower ranks, but at the same time most players would not approve of such a change.

 

In order for this to make sense economically, the Battle Pass would still be required to purchase, at any rank. You need to change it.

The prize we get and the prize low ranks get should NOT be the same, because many people make a new account (an example goes to my friend in RL who has made a new acc just for the battle pass) and the golden tier gives a lot of prize to them, so they get a lot of crystals, containers etc.

 

I support this idea to the end since low ranks shouldn't face buyers much. Most of the low ranks leave this game because of buyers :/

[Maf 32,337]

Yes, of course Maf. I agree with you. The battle pass needs to be purchasable at any rank. Sorry, I forgot to mention about that.

Can you please edit your post to reflect that?

 

Also, make sure you quote my post when you reply to me. If you simply make a new post without quoting then it's likely I would not see it. If it wasn't for @loginci quoting me and sending me a notification, I wouldn't have checked the topic.

[lssimo 1,559]

They could give the Weekly Containers too, since those have lower rewards for lower tanks.

 

That's why I was saying that the name needs to change, I think it should be name Crates instead of Weekly containers.

[Aigaion 636]

I just think it sucks how they switched the containers, wasn't this system supposed to replace a system that gave you 4 containers with 1 mission a day, now its 3 containers for, 3 missions a day? its awfull

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

I know it sucks to get less containers a day, but developers might realize that they made a mistake, so later they might change it back to 6 normal containers and also keep the 6 weekly containers so that players have even bigger rewards.

 

Just wait and see.

 

I understand that the name "crates" would be a good name to give for weekly containers, but developers would need to make a new type of container called crates. Crates would give much bigger rewards than weekly containers, so they would be given out to players only once per month.

 

A while ago I have mentioned about having monthly containers. Developers complained about them, so I suggest monthly crates would be more suitable.

 

Hey Maf. I have edited my post like you asked me.

 

Please read the added post from my edited post below:

 

 

It's already added to the main post at the top of this page. Its located on the last paragraph of my first post.

 

 

Can you please edit your post to reflect that?

 

Also, make sure you quote my post when you reply to me. If you simply make a new post without quoting then it's likely I would not see it. If it wasn't for @loginci quoting me and sending me a notification, I wouldn't have checked the topic.

Sorry Maf. I forgot to quote you. I am also sorry for making too many posts at once. Please don't ban me, and forgive me for that mistake.

 

I have added a new paragraph on my first post. It is the final paragraph. It explains that players would be able to buy a stars pass at any rank without restrictions. Please read it and agree with my suggestion.

 

Thank you Maf.

[Maf 32,337]

Hey Maf. I have edited my post like you asked me.

Alright, thanks.

 

Idea status changed.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Please Maf can you explain to me what the Valid status stands for. I have never seen Valid mentioned in forums before. Please explain that in the next V-Log to properly inform players about the change and what it stands for.

 

Thank you.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

In my post, I am not asking for reducing the rewards of the current silver and gold tier, in general. Overall, the bronze, silver and gold tier size rewards would of course depend on the player's rank. So, if you are a Recruit, your rewards would be very small for all three tiers. For Legend ranks, the rewards would be huge.

 

Apart from the, for bronze, silver and gold tier rewards, the rewards would be different sizes. Silver tier would be double the bronze tier, and gold tier would be double the silver tier. That's how it's supposed to work.

[Pyre 3,485]

Please Maf can you explain to me what the Valid status stands for. I have never seen Valid mentioned in forums before. Please explain that in the next V-Log to properly inform players about the change and what it stands for.

 

Thank you.

It means the same thing as "Under review" used to. Maf notified the I&S section followers by posting a topic with the title explaining the change, then deleted it (Unless that was just a dream :P) Since you post here so much, I might suggest following the forum. Also, if you want people to respond to your posts, try quoting them so they are notified.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Thanks for mentioning about the change. I sometimes quote, but for general answers, I do not quote.

[Person_Random 4,991]

I would like that, especially since I hate being excluded from the good rewards!

... oh wait... there's still a gold tier I have to reach.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

I am not asking to lower the rewards from the silver tier, but ask to add a bronze tier.

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

Please Maf, can you ask developers to add a bronze tier to challenges. It does not make much sense to only have silver and gold tiers. Since, writing this thread, challenges have changed quite a lot now. What I would propose developers to do is to add a bronze tier. The bronze tier would consist of rewards to be half the size as the silver tier. Nothing in the silver or gold tiers would be affected.

 

The only thing that the bronze tier would have is less stars. I would say a total of 750 stars to reach the final tier. The purpose of a bronze tier is for players that does not have enough time to play Tanki Online to finish challenges sooner. The reason why I put this bronze tier like this is because many players don't play Tanki Online much due to school, college or work, so the bronze tier would make life easier for players to complete challenges quicker.

 

The bronze tier would not rewards players with skins or paints, but only crystals and supplies. Small quantities, of course, that are manageable and suitable for both players and the game's economy. The last tier on the bronze tier would only reward players with a supply pack.

 

Please accept this idea of mine and add it to future challenges.

 

Thank you.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

Instead of calling them gold plus, gold, silver, and bronze tiers, if Tanki will implement this idea, they should change the tiers to M0-lower rankers receive automatically. M1 is available for purchase for lower rankers. M1 is free for  Warrant Officer 1 to Colonel and they can buy M2 tier. M2 is free for Brigadier to Legend and they can buy M3. Since crystal amounts vary by rank in regard to equipment and rewards, challenge tiers should also vary by rewards.

What do you guys think of my version of Riddler's Idea?

 

...Thank you.

 

Idea status changed.

What do you guys REALLY think?

[RIDDLER_8 5,558]

This is my idea. I think that the silver and bronze tiers must be free for all ranks.

[mjmj5558 2,346]

I like this idea !

On 10/17/2019 at 3:23 AM, ILiveOnTheChatBox123 said:

Instead of calling them gold plus, gold, silver, and bronze tiers, if Tanki will implement this idea, they should change the tiers to M0-lower rankers receive automatically. M1 is available for purchase for lower rankers. M1 is free for  Warrant Officer 1 to Colonel and they can buy M2 tier. M2 is free for Brigadier to Legend and they can buy M3. Since crystal amounts vary by rank in regard to equipment and rewards, challenge tiers should also vary by rewards.

What do you guys think of my version of Riddler's Idea?

 

 

What do you guys REALLY think?

Noooo this make the game very very pay to win!

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

10 hours ago, mjmj5558 said:

I like this idea !

Noooo this make the game very very pay to win!

Buyers are not going to get such a boost from this, as they can already buyout all the tiers anyway. The difference between the tiers won't be such a drastic difference. In such a format, rewards increase at a good level per rank, while Tanki is not losing too much revenue from the game-balance.

You can't expect Tanki to make this game totally free, they are not going to fork over their cash so easily. But they would be willing to add a balance per rank if there is still slight room for buyers to gain.

[r_Given6 859]

44 minutes ago, ILiveOnTheChatBox123 said:

Buyers are not going to get such a boost from this, as they can already buyout all the tiers anyway. The difference between the tiers won't be such a drastic difference. In such a format, rewards increase at a good level per rank, while Tanki is not losing too much revenue from the game-balance.

You can't expect Tanki to make this game totally free, they are not going to fork over their cash so easily. But they would be willing to add a balance per rank if there is still slight room for buyers to gain.

What's the use if, in the end, you get lesser rewards just because of your rank? 

Players would approve the low rewards only if there are lesser tiers and a good reward in the end. Since lower ranks don't need all those supplies, the Challenge can be capped at, say, 25 tiers at the lowest ranks. They would get regular rewards for each tier, but the total would be less. Also, there may be a Shot effect or some nice cosmetic feature as the last reward.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

1 minute ago, Given said:

What's the use if, in the end, you get lesser rewards just because of your rank?

Since Containers already give players of higher ranks more rewards, shouldn't challenges be the same?

 

2 minutes ago, Given said:

Players would approve the low rewards only if there are lesser tiers and a good reward in the end. Since lower ranks don't need all those supplies, the Challenge can be capped at, say, 25 tiers at the lowest ranks. They would get regular rewards for each tier, but the total would be less. Also, there may be a Shot effect or some nice cosmetic feature as the last reward.

Lower ranked players rewards can either be shorter or less, but it would accomplish the same goal of making challenge rewards more per rank.

[r_Given6 859]

45 minutes ago, ILiveOnTheChatBox123 said:

Since Containers already give players of higher ranks more rewards...

No, they don't.

Weekly containers do, but that's balanced out by easier missions. Challenges aren't made easier; the competition is still the same, if not worse with all those buyers with higher equipment modifications.