Ideas Section Discussion

[r_Given6 859]

I won't argue about it or try to brag about my skills with Wasp, but I feel like Wasp is the kind of hull which takes a lot of effort to master, but once you do, then it becomes superior with every turret, at any range.

I agree, since I love Wasp, but what about Vulcan-Wasp?

[AncientFire 1,894]

I agree, since I love Wasp, but what about Vulcan-Wasp?

rip lol

Edited April 8, 2019 by sarim2345_the_master

[Maf 32,300]

I agree, since I love Wasp, but what about Vulcan-Wasp?

Oh, right. We don't talk about that one...

[GorgoBlesk 831]

Oh, right. We don't talk about that one...

Wasp Twins and Wasp Rico are OK? They are basically self-flipping devices.

[r_Given6 859]

Wasp Twins and Wasp Rico are OK? They are basically self-flipping devices.

I saw a Wasp-Twins rocking a DM battle once... and Wasp-Ricochet was one of my favourite combos in Noise.

[Maf 32,300]

Wasp Twins and Wasp Rico are OK? They are basically self-flipping devices.

OK, OK, you got me there too. Although I did play with Twins and Rico a few times and it kinda worked, although definitely takes a lot of concentration to not flip yourself.

[Initiate 1,306]

I agree, since I love Wasp, but what about Vulcan-Wasp?

Has anyone noticed that it's extremely common to see Wasp/Vulcan at the ranks with M0 Wasp? I don't know why, it's a terrible combo.

 

*Edit: IMO

Edited April 10, 2019 by Initiate

[GorgoBlesk 831]

Has anyone noticed that it's extremely common to see Wasp/Vulcan at the ranks with M0 Wasp? I don't know why, it's a terrible combo.

 

*Edit: IMO

Maybe the newbies see too much Tanki videos with combos like Viking Thunder, Hornet Shaft and Wasp Rail. They want to use the same combos and do not realise that Hunter is a perfect hull.

[Initiate 1,306]

Maybe the newbies see too much Tanki videos with combos like Viking Thunder, Hornet Shaft and Wasp Rail. They want to use the same combos and do not realise that Hunter is a perfect hull.

Good point. I used to wonder why anyone would use Hunter, especially after seeing tons of videos with Viking. Then I tried Hunter. I haven't used Viking since.

[7ac 269]

I think Tanki should make a thing like where you can donate your XT skins to players or even be able to trade stuff for other stuff.

[r_Given6 859]

I did not use to actually watch much of those gameplay videos, but they do make some combos feel OP.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

Good point. I used to wonder why anyone would use Hunter, especially after seeing tons of videos with Viking. Then I tried Hunter. I haven't used Viking since.

If your style needs a little more armour you need to use viking over Hunter.

Can I leave a suggestion about the Forum here-and Maf will answer it?

[Initiate 1,306]

If your style needs a little more armour you need to use viking over Hunter.

Can I leave a suggestion about the Forum here-and Maf will answer it?

Why not? Doesn't Viking have less armour than Hunter at M2?

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

Why not? Doesn't Viking have less armour than Hunter at M2?

No way-

at M1 the protection for Hunter is 1324-while the protection for viking is-1941

[Initiate 1,306]

No way-

at M1 the protection for Hunter is 1324-while the protection for viking is-1941

What are you on right now, my friend? This is Hunter, not Hornet. I did get it wrong, Hunter has less at M2 but more at M1.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

What are you on right now, my friend? This is Hunter, not Hornet. I did get it wrong, Hunter has less at M2 but more at M1.

Sorry, you are right it does have more at M1-but less speed.

Once I stuck with it and have it a full Module better-I might as well use Viking

[Initiate 1,306]

Sorry, you are right it does have more at M1-but less speed.

Once I stuck with it and have it a full Module better-I might as well use Viking

Well, I'm already at Hunter M2 so I'm certainly not going down to Viking M1 :) I don't think I'll get Viking M2. But one thing, you said M1 has 1390 HP. Kindly remember that M0 mediums start at 1500 :)

[Maf 32,300]

Guys, I don't mind a few unrelated comments, but please try to stay on topic. For conversations on other topics please use PM, or post in the relevant thread: What to buy? Which is better?

[DieselPlatinum 5,121]

Sorry, you are right it does have more at M1-but less speed.

Once I stuck with it and have it a full Module better-I might as well use Viking

Health and speed shouldn't be the only important stats of a hull.

 

 

Turning speed is great for sharp turning.

 

Weight is great for stability meaning that the more weight a hull has, the harder it'll be to knock it's aim off.

 

The power stat has two key aspects: acceleration and pushing power. And the higher concentration of the power stat you have, the faster you can get up to speed and the heavier the tanks you can push.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

Well, I'm already at Hunter M2 so I'm certainly not going down to Viking M1 :) I don't think I'll get Viking M2. But one thing, you said M1 has 1390 HP. Kindly remember that M0 mediums start at 1500 :)

I really want to answer you that you are really wrong-since I said:

 

No way-

at M1 the protection for Hunter  (Hornet) is 1324-while the protection for viking is-1941

First of all I said M1-why are you asking me about M0?

Also-you already corrected my mistake that I brought you the numbers from the hornet-which is not a medium hull.

 

But Maf said:

 

Guys, I don't mind a few unrelated comments, but please try to stay on topic. For conversations on other topics please use PM, or post in the relevant thread: What to buy? Which is better?

So don't post about this topic.

Edited May 8, 2019 by ILiveOnTheChatBox123

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

 

 

 

Guys, I don't mind a few unrelated comments, but please try to stay on topic. For conversations on other topics please use PM, or post in the relevant thread: What to buy? Which is better?

 

Wait-what is this topic about-suggestions for the Fourm? 

[Maf 32,300]

Wait-what is this topic about-suggestions for the Fourm? 

It's about the ideas section itself.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

It's about the ideas section itself.

So can I suggest this idea?:

Why not make a different system than the current group system of where you can start topics.

Why can't I start a topic in this forum-but players with hardly any posts are able to post anything-regardless of their experience in the forum?

The groups must be revamped urgently!

[Maf 32,300]

So can I suggest this idea?:

Why not make a different system than the current group system of where you can start topics.

Why can't I start a topic in this forum-but players with hardly any posts are able to post anything-regardless of their experience in the forum?

The groups must be revamped urgently!

The system is in place to prevent players using disposable low rank accounts to break rules on the forum, like spam a bunch of topics. Limiting their permissions helps avoid that. In the majority of cases, players discover the forum only once they're way past the WO-1 rank, so they come here already having full permissions. You're a rare exception, so unfortunately you have to bear with it a bit longer, until you rank up one more time.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

If the problem is from players spamming, why can't it be something based somewhat on posts (and likes)?

Why should a player be able to start posting topics with hardly any posts-just because they have the rank?

Anyone with several high accounts is still able to spam :ph34r:-even though they don't have any posts-so require 50 posts in order to post a topic?

No? :(