Admit it, for yourself! Tanki works just as the world works. And the world's not as nice as it is in the cartoons.

[B-E-T-E-L-G-E-U-S-E 49]

When I start comparing Tanki to the real world, everyone starts saying it's just a game, and it has nothing to do with the real life. Well, I say that the players of this game live in a small box, in a small, nice and comfortable box. They don't want to leave this box. THEY DON'T WANT TO OPEN THEIR EYES. They are good inside that box. But that won't make all the things outside the box disappear. 

I could explain in plenty of ways that Tanki's devs. are some corrupt, but I'll just simply choose the latest thing that has recently happened to me.

Some guys started sabotaging my battle. It was  a Hill 4 vs. 4. We reported them(with my friend), but nobody came(or at least they didn't want us to know they saw what's happening). 

So I started recording. Here's the video: Link removed

 And I sent this letter to Tanki in email: 

Fair enough, right? I got proof, they had one thing to do only. To judge. 

But what do I get instead? 

Correction: the link works if you coppy-paste it in a browser, but DOES NOT work if you just click on it. 

Never mind. Let's try telling them that I've sent them the video... You know, if it wasn't obvious enough already... 

And as you could guess already, I got no answer. I've sent the last email ( "this is the proof " ) two days ago. They obviously don't want to answer. But who cares? We still have RU Forum, right? RIGHT? Right. 

No. We don't.  

No reply. 

Note: yes, my browser is translating Russian content automatically. 

Honestly I don't know what else to say... I mean I could say plenty of things, but... I'm tired of all this. That's why I basically just stay stuck to the facts, as you can see below. You judge. 

 

Edited March 26, 2020 by Leur
profanity removed.

[Mular 145]

A rather unfortuate series of events I daresay.

[B-E-T-E-L-G-E-U-S-E 49]

23 minutes ago, Cue said:

A rather unfortuate series of events I daresay.

That word has NOTHING to do with the series of facts I've written below. 'Unfortunate' is a relative term. 'A fact' will always be A FACT. And I only wrote facts below, except that box stuff, which was more of a prologue. 

[Toby 2,938]

Game violation reports are meant to be submitted (and dealt with by the specially trained Battle Moderators group) in the dedicated Game Violation Reports section on the RU Forum — not sent to the Tech Support, as it's not their primary job but that of the Battle Mods (which is obviously the reason why we have these guys). The reason why a moderator might not have been able to join your battle is: a) you and your teammate haven't submitted the vote together quickly enough (which would be the minimum requirement (15% of total battle participants) for the battle to become highlighted for the moderators), or b) moderators have been occupied with moderating the previously-reported battles, as there's simply just many of them and they cannot be present at two or more places at the same time. Each case is dealt with on an individual basis.

Just because your unapproved report might have already been checked but not answered doesn't mean that it's being ignored or anything else in that matter. To fully process all of the pending reports ("behind the scenes" if you will) takes time.

I've checked the RU Game Violation Reports section and the last approved report is from Monday, meaning that all of the current pending reports will be officially answered and approved soon. All that's required of you is patience (and preferably some kindness, too :)).

 

Not in regards to this very case but overall, I'd also like to stress that sabotage is when a player deliberately plays in a way that obstructs their team at the benefit of the opponent. As long as a player objectively uses the best (or close to) equipment available at their disposal and plays to the best of their ability, that is not sabotage, although stronger members of the team may sometimes find it as an inconvenience in the heat of the battle — however as already mentioned, it's not to be mistaken with actual sabotage.

[Benefactor 6,888]

They lowered it from the required minimum of 25% total battle participants to have voted?

[Viking4s 10,791]

4 minutes ago, Benefactor said:

They lowered it from the required minimum of 25% total battle participants to have voted?

yes, a very long time ago.

[Benefactor 6,888]

4 minutes ago, Viking4s said:

yes, a very long time ago.

In a galaxy far, far away?

I didn't get a copy of the memo.

[B-E-T-E-L-G-E-U-S-E 49]

24 minutes ago, ControlledChaos said:

Game violation reports are meant to be submitted (and dealt with by the specially trained Battle Moderators group) in the dedicated Game Violation Reports section on the RU Forum - not sent to the Tech Support, as it's not their primary job but that of the Battle Mods (which is obviously the reason why we have these guys). The reason why a moderator might not have been able to join your battle is: a) you and your teammate haven't submitted the vote together quickly enough (which would be the minimum requirement (15% of total battle participants) for the battle to become highlighted for the moderators), or b) moderators have been occupied with moderating the previously-reported battles, as there's simply just many of them and they cannot be present at two or more places at the same time. Each case is dealt with on an individual basis.

Just because your unapproved report might have already been checked but not answered doesn't mean that it's being ignored or anything else in that matter. To fully process all of the pending reports ("behind the scenes" if you will) takes time.

I've checked the RU Game Violation Reports section and the last approved report is from Monday, meaning that all of the current pending reports will be officially answered and approved soon. All that's required of you is patience (and preferably some kindness, too :)).

 

I'd also like to stress that sabotage is when a player deliberately plays in a way that obstructs their team at the benefit of the opponent. As long as a player objectively uses the best (or close to) equipment available at their disposal and plays to the best of their ability, that is not sabotage, although stronger members of the team may sometimes find it as an inconvenience in the heat of the battle - however as already mentioned, it's not to be mistaken with actual sabotage.

I'm sorry but I don't agree with you. This cases DO NOT require professionals. In this case the sabotage is obvious since they had Mk7, aww, let's just say they had M3, both of them. They were using M2+M1, if I'm right. Also, there was an obvious hack attempt at 4:40-4:55, by one of them. I'm sorry but the support had one thing only. To check if the battle I recorded DID EXIST or NOT. In case the battle is real, the sabotage is.oebvious, as the chat shows as well in the video, which you didn't watch I suppose, but immediately wrote a long text to teach me how tanki works. Give yourself a break.

[Viking4s 10,791]

2 minutes ago, Benefactor said:

In a galaxy far, far away?

I didn't get a copy of the memo.

Spend less time in the shop
Patch Update #516 - Released 30th June 2018 

Quote

June 30 2018 (Update 516)
Daily missions to earn experience points were replaced with missions to earn score in battles.
Fixed error in Matchmaking when several battle groups could be put onto the same team, and at the same time no battle group would be placed on the opposing team.
The number of player reports required for the battle to be highlighted for battle moderators to check was lowered from 25% to 15% of the number of players in the battle.

 It is about the time Mobile test started, as you can't vote on the mobile, they had to reduced the number of vote required otherwise 25% would be more difficult to acheive.

[Benefactor 6,888]

16 minutes ago, Viking4s said:

Spend less time in the shop
Patch Update #516 - Released 30th June 2018 

 It is about the time Mobile test started, as you can't vote on the mobile, they had to reduced the number of vote required otherwise 25% would be more difficult to acheive.

Thanks!

[Toby 2,938]

@B-E-T-E-L-G-E-U-S-E 

I gave you a clear explanation as to your situation and that's all that's necessary.

Since everything has been explained in regards to this matter, I'm hereby closing this thread.