More of like game disgustion

[DieselPlatinum 5,121]

2 hours ago, wolverine848 said:

Yeah, that's what I would expect. 

Might be a few left-overs that have not played much.  But that's no different from the odd Captains I encountered sporting Prodigi paint when I was a 1st Lieutenant.

Containers have really changed the game, more than I have first thought. On all my accounts lower than the WO ranks, I'm just pulling 10k crystals out of containers quite often and 25k occasionally. And not only just crystals but a set of 125 of supplies and you're good on those for a while.

[Juke.Box.Hero 11]

 

I have read almost every single comment and well the side against Tanki and updates holds a stronger argument. I don't know where to start, but going through different social media and forum posts you can easily tell that there are a large number of close, loyal tankers who constantly share negative feedback. This feedback is rarely taken into consideration and the alterations (augments) update is the only exception I can think of. Looking into the feedback take for example the recent alteration (augments) update, which I mentioned earlier. When released on their Youtube page the comments on those certain videos were and are 80% or 90% negative comments towards the update. The only positive comments they get are mostly on social media about different challenges coming out and giveaways.

Moving further into updates I have seen some people defending Tanki, saying if they listened to all the feedback and took action on it this would make the game play worse. However, they could temporarily remove the updates which have received the most negative feedback. With coding, as well as other things, this would be difficult and would take time, but would benefit devs/mods and players as it would put them on ground level seeing eye to eye. Hopefully giving a 3rd person perspective. Looking at numbers though and my own experience playing 24 hours for experiments on numbers of players and when, it is most certain that Tanki has lost a significant amount of players and because of that a significant amount of active accounts. Now to this there was an argument that updates bring back inactive members, but this is only partially true. Addressing the whole situation, updates do bring back players, but only for experimental game play like someone pointed out. With the pandemic having gained more coverage though and actions taken to reduce the amount of cases, more people will come back to Tanki because there is nothing to do. I do believe after people are able to resume to normal life again Tanki will dip in players and be forced to make more financial decisions which will negatively affect all players.

IMO I don't think Tanki will last long losing key figures within it's business who had huge effects on players attitude toward the game as well as opinions. My best estimate for the game being terminated is 2021 in the fall/winter if not then, then I would say around Tanki's birthday for one last hurrah. This also supports the reason for loss of players because of the treatment in which they have received regardless of the circumstances.

Now a hot topic on this post is the new battle system (matchmaking/MM). While playing on multiple accounts I have had, while also seeing screenshots shared by others on this post, I have come to find that it is common to see an imbalance in game play. A rebuttal to this was that it made them interested in losing 0-5, tying 1-1 and winning 5-0. This however is not valid for all modes and maps because most ties only apply to certain maps and not modes. This is because of a new game play that is unbalanced with the way kits as well as other things have been translated through updates.

Branched off to this it also deals with players and Tanki have done well making it anti P2W well also making it P2W. For example past P2W players who have come back because of COVID-19 are too powerful until you get into the higher ranks. Like with my warrant officer two accounts I came across an old player who had MK8 everything with a score of 9999 which led to horrible game play because he brought imbalance. Also, with the way you are able to upgrade different turrets and hulls this has offset old Tanki players who were not well experienced. Take in example a in the past your first M1 was available at I believe Warrant Officer 2 if not 1. Now all these players that had m0s at ranks near those ranks are going to struggle. Some people might say they have crystals saved up to buy the hulls and turrets to compete though. That can only be taken into consideration with some players though. And why only some is because in the old era of tanki XP, crystals and other things were harder to obtain and obtained in lower quantities. In time they have increased the number  which you received these things by many numbers. Going deeper into the matter of the matching itself though you see people with GSs (gear scores) lower than two thousand going against people with GSs of four thousand with a deviation of a thousand give or take. When taking into account buyers and druggers this really messes things up for players because while also having a large range in GSs you also have a large range in rankings. Now I don't know how the matching works, but it is not very effective as I am able to go against Corporals and Marshals. This is in different games for each of those ranks  of course, but when taking into account the numbers of ranks that those hold apart from my rank is crazy because that's 10+ ranks.

Now for the repliers  who have higher authority in Tanki and are replying to these comments please, I ask you to really think of what you will say because these players are still loyal to the game even after what has been done to them as well as the irregular players understand them. I wish the best for this game, but I know this wish will never come true because as someone said there are communicative barriers as well as cultural, but that is so flawed lmao like come on that is why we have community managers for each language. Maybe past ones have left because they saw this coming and I wish they would have tried to tell us, but that might've led to Tanki taking legal actions against them. Hopefully when reading this at the end you will realize you should be able to agree with what I have said and if not well reply so I can see your pov

Edited June 8, 2020 by Juke.Box.Hero
Kindly use the default font colour and non-bolded text. Inciting flooding is not permitted. Juke.box.hero: I understand, but I will change the text/font to how I like it because Tanki has allowed for this to happen. Also where was I inciting flooding?

[Juke.Box.Hero 11]

39 minutes ago, E_polypterus said:

Too long bro  : 0

Yeah I know, but it only took me like 6 minutes to type. Also, if someone reads that and still thinks tanki's updates are amazing well F

 

[DieselPlatinum 5,121]

12 hours ago, Juke.Box.Hero said:

Yeah I know, but it only took me like 6 minutes to type. Also, if someone reads that and still thinks tanki's updates are amazing well F

 

IMO, 2018 was the last decent year of the game. Everything really went downhill at the start of last year starting with the release of challenges, then they released the Hyperion drone, and siege mode, and they released that Damn hybrid turret named Gauss which has single handedly ruin the balance.

[wolverine848 13,097]

19 hours ago, Juke.Box.Hero said:

I have read almost every single comment and well the side against Tanki and updates holds a stronger argument. I don't know where to start, but going through different social media and forum posts you can easily tell that there are a large number of close, loyal tankers who constantly share negative feed back. This feedback is rarely taken into consideration and the alterations (augments) update is the only exception I can think of. Looking into the feedback take for example the recent alteration (augments) update, which I mentioned earlier. When released on their Youtube page the comments on those certain videos were and are 80% or 90% negative comments towards the update. The only positive comments they get are mostly on social media about different challenges coming out and giveaways. Moving further into updates I have seen some people defending Tanki, saying if they listened to all the feedback and took action on it this would make the game play worse. However, they could temporary remove the updates which have received the most negative feedback. With coding, as well as other things, this would be difficult and would take time, but would benefit devs/mods and players as it would put them on ground level seeing eye to eye. Hopefully giving a 3rd person perspective. Looking at numbers though and my own experience playing 24 hours for experiments on numbers of players and when, it is most certain that Tanki has lot a significant amount of players and because of that a significant amount of active accounts. Now to this there was an argument that updates bring back inactive members, but this is only partially true. Addressing the whole situation, updates do bring back players, but only for experimental game play like someone pointed out. With the pandemic having gaining more coverage though and actions taken reduce the amount of cases, more people will come back to Tanki because there is nothing to do. I do believe after people are able to resume to normal life again Tanki will dip in players and be forced to make more financial decisions which will negatively affect all players. I can't remember if there was something else I have seen which caught my eye, but none the less I don't think Tanki will last long losing key figures within it's business who had huge effects on players attitude toward the game as well as opinions. My best estimate for the game being terminated is 2021 in the fall/winter if not then, then I would say around Tanki's birthday for one last hurrah. OOOOOOOO I remembered something yes haha the the new battle system (match making/MM). While playing on multiple accounts I have had, while also seeing screenshots shared by others on this post, I have come to find that it is common to see an imbalance in game play. A rebuttal to this was that it made them interesting in losing 0-5, tying 1-1 and winning 5-0. This however is not valid for all modes and maps because most ties only apply to certain maps and not modes. This is because of a new game play that is unbalanced with the way kits as well as other things have been translated through updates. They have done well making it anti P2W well also making it P2W. For example past P2W players who have come back because of COVID-19 are too powerful until you get into the higher ranks. Like with my warrant officer two account I came across an old player who had MK8 everything with a score of 9999 which lead to horrible game play because he brought imbalance. Also, with the way you are able to upgrade different turrets and hulls this has offset old Tanki players who were not well experienced. Take in example a in the past your first M1 was available at I believe Warrant Officer 2 if not 1. Now all these players that had m0s at ranks near those ranks are going to struggle. Some people might say they have crystals saved up to buy the hulls and turrets to compete though. That can only be taken into consideration with some players though. And why only some is because in the old era of tanki XP, crystals and other things were harder to obtain and obtained in lower quantities. In time they have increased the number  which you received these things by many numbers. Going deeper into the matter of the matching itself though you see people with GSs (gear scores) lower than two thousand going against people with GSs of four thousand with a deviation of a thousand give or take. When taking into account buyers and druggers this really messes things up for players because while also having a large range in GSs you also have a large range in rankings. Now I don't know how the matching works, but it is not very effective as I am able to go against Corporals and Marshals. This is in different games for each of those ranks  of course, but when taking into account the numbers of ranks that those hold apart from my rank is crazy because that's 10+ ranks. Also for those who have higher authority in Tanki and are replying to these comments please I ask you to really think of what you will say because these players are still loyal to the game even after what has been done to them as well as the irregular players. Also, you must look at the arguments been given to u as well as the regular players that are defending Tanki and realize they are when looked at right greater in quality to yours . I wish the best for this game, but I know this wish will never come true because as someone said there are communicative barriers as well as cultural, but that is so flawed lmao like come on that is why we have community managers for each language. Maybe past ones have left because they saw this coming and I wish they would have tried to tell us, but that might've lead to Tanki taking legal actions against them. Hopefully when reading this at the end you will realize you should be able to agree with what I have said and if not well reply so I can see your pov

WOW.   Kindly use paragraphs and line-breaks.   That wall of text is unreadable.

[Juke.Box.Hero 11]

9 hours ago, wolverine848 said:

WOW.   Kindly use paragraphs and line-breaks.   That wall of text is unreadable.

yeah my bad probably should have thought about that and am planning on editing it tomorrow so it is better for the forum. thanks for the feed back.

[vourlo 28]

On 5/25/2020 at 8:45 PM, wolverine848 said:

Yes the conversion was crap (m2.10 to mk7.0)

Now you need to wait it out as they rank up much faster than you - since - as they destroy the other teams, they get more rewards and more experience.

What else are you suggesting?   They don't reverse major updates - so think of something besides reversal.

I can't think anything else. Either M system or Mk system are reasonable but the uptade-conversion was the bad one. 

For example if there was the mk from the beginning we wouldn't have anything like this now. 

[vourlo 28]

On 5/25/2020 at 9:18 PM, DieselPlatinum said:

How do you not know what it's supposed to mean?

I'm saying that before the whole mk update, he could've just only played to do missions and then stopped for the day, while getting super nice rewards from containers.

I still think they should've at least tried simpler solutions before resorting to this update.

Yes but this doesn't have to do with anything I said. I said the mk uptade is a bit crap because of what I just showed in the img. I also said that this dude in this rank is far superior. So what does the fact that he was lucky or that he was doing missions has to do with what I said. 

[Viking4s 10,791]

On 5/25/2020 at 6:17 PM, vourlo said:

What does that suppose to mean. Im trying to say that this dude (and so do others) is completely destroying the game because of the mk uptade. New players have no chance standing in front of mk7 in Lieautenaunt Ranks.

That is only one side of the update, not the best for sure, but which beneficiate a few players. The other side is the limitation of the stock modification that limits and reduce the gap between players. That part is the important side and that beneficiate the vast majority of players. It will be truly and fully effective when the strong players are gone.

The question as why they did Mk7-20/0 instead of Mk6-10/10 is a complete mystery. I suppose it is a gift for buyers and XP/BP players, so they could fast tract to higher ranks and play XP/BP which is now limited to only Mk7. 
On purpose or not, tanki did x1.75 both in XP and Crystals that would help the Mk7 to quickly get to higher rank, that had definitly wed out some strong player from low ranks. 

New players certainly do not play against Mk7, Mk6 yes, but when Mk7 is on the battlefield you are at a level with a certain amount of experience which do not qualify as newbie.

Edited May 28, 2020 by Viking4s

[vourlo 28]

On 5/27/2020 at 6:22 AM, Juke.Box.Hero said:

I have read almost every single comment and well the side against Tanki and updates holds a stronger argument. I don't know where to start, but going through different social media and forum posts you can easily tell that there are a large number of close, loyal tankers who constantly share negative feed back. This feedback is rarely taken into consideration and the alterations (augments) update is the only exception I can think of. Looking into the feedback take for example the recent alteration (augments) update, which I mentioned earlier. When released on their Youtube page the comments on those certain videos were and are 80% or 90% negative comments towards the update. The only positive comments they get are mostly on social media about different challenges coming out and giveaways. Moving further into updates I have seen some people defending Tanki, saying if they listened to all the feedback and took action on it this would make the game play worse. However, they could temporary remove the updates which have received the most negative feedback. With coding, as well as other things, this would be difficult and would take time, but would benefit devs/mods and players as it would put them on ground level seeing eye to eye. Hopefully giving a 3rd person perspective. Looking at numbers though and my own experience playing 24 hours for experiments on numbers of players and when, it is most certain that Tanki has lot a significant amount of players and because of that a significant amount of active accounts. Now to this there was an argument that updates bring back inactive members, but this is only partially true. Addressing the whole situation, updates do bring back players, but only for experimental game play like someone pointed out. With the pandemic having gaining more coverage though and actions taken reduce the amount of cases, more people will come back to Tanki because there is nothing to do. I do believe after people are able to resume to normal life again Tanki will dip in players and be forced to make more financial decisions which will negatively affect all players. I can't remember if there was something else I have seen which caught my eye, but none the less I don't think Tanki will last long losing key figures within it's business who had huge effects on players attitude toward the game as well as opinions. My best estimate for the game being terminated is 2021 in the fall/winter if not then, then I would say around Tanki's birthday for one last hurrah. OOOOOOOO I remembered something yes haha the the new battle system (match making/MM). While playing on multiple accounts I have had, while also seeing screenshots shared by others on this post, I have come to find that it is common to see an imbalance in game play. A rebuttal to this was that it made them interesting in losing 0-5, tying 1-1 and winning 5-0. This however is not valid for all modes and maps because most ties only apply to certain maps and not modes. This is because of a new game play that is unbalanced with the way kits as well as other things have been translated through updates. They have done well making it anti P2W well also making it P2W. For example past P2W players who have come back because of COVID-19 are too powerful until you get into the higher ranks. Like with my warrant officer two account I came across an old player who had MK8 everything with a score of 9999 which lead to horrible game play because he brought imbalance. Also, with the way you are able to upgrade different turrets and hulls this has offset old Tanki players who were not well experienced. Take in example a in the past your first M1 was available at I believe Warrant Officer 2 if not 1. Now all these players that had m0s at ranks near those ranks are going to struggle. Some people might say they have crystals saved up to buy the hulls and turrets to compete though. That can only be taken into consideration with some players though. And why only some is because in the old era of tanki XP, crystals and other things were harder to obtain and obtained in lower quantities. In time they have increased the number  which you received these things by many numbers. Going deeper into the matter of the matching itself though you see people with GSs (gear scores) lower than two thousand going against people with GSs of four thousand with a deviation of a thousand give or take. When taking into account buyers and druggers this really messes things up for players because while also having a large range in GSs you also have a large range in rankings. Now I don't know how the matching works, but it is not very effective as I am able to go against Corporals and Marshals. This is in different games for each of those ranks  of course, but when taking into account the numbers of ranks that those hold apart from my rank is crazy because that's 10+ ranks. Also for those who have higher authority in Tanki and are replying to these comments please I ask you to really think of what you will say because these players are still loyal to the game even after what has been done to them as well as the irregular players. Also, you must look at the arguments been given to u as well as the regular players that are defending Tanki and realize they are when looked at right greater in quality to yours . I wish the best for this game, but I know this wish will never come true because as someone said there are communicative barriers as well as cultural, but that is so flawed lmao like come on that is why we have community managers for each language. Maybe past ones have left because they saw this coming and I wish they would have tried to tell us, but that might've lead to Tanki taking legal actions against them. Hopefully when reading this at the end you will realize you should be able to agree with what I have said and if not well reply so I can see your pov

Man. Read it all. Well explained. With honesty and reasonable arguments. Agree with everything you say. If there was one emotional dude in between tank's devs the game would have returned to normal after reading my first text and this one. Especially this one damn. 

Thank you for offering good content in this topic. 

[vourlo 28]

3 minutes ago, Viking4s said:

That is only one side of the update, not the best for sure, but which affect a few players. The other side is the limitation of the stock modification that limits and reduce the gap between players. That part is the important side and that affect the vast majority of players.

The question as why they did Mk7-20/0 instead of Mk6-10/10 is a complete mystery. I suppose it is a gift for buyers and XP/BP players, so they could fast tract to higher ranks and play XP/BP which is now limited to only Mk7. 
On purpose or not, tanki did x1.75 both in XP and Crystals that would help the Mk7 to quickly get to higher rank, that had definitly wed out some strogn player from low ranks. 
New players certainly do not play against Mk7, Mk6 yes, but when Mk7 is on the battlefield you are at a level with a certain amount of experience which do not qualify as newbie.

Bruh what I know is that in my two lower accs wo4 and wo5 I may play against mk7 or even mk8 combos of course because of this uptade while I'm shooting them with my poor mk3 vulcan which I think is quite normal to have in this rank if your not a buyer right? Or am I a noob? 

Edited May 28, 2020 by vourlo

[Viking4s 10,791]

6 minutes ago, vourlo said:

Bruh what I know is that in my two lower accs wo4 and wo5 I may play against mk7 or even mk8 combos of course because of this uptade while I'm shooting them with my poor mk3 vulcan which I think is quite normal to have in this rank if your not a buyer right? Or am I a noob? 

At Wo4 and 5, i can confirm that you are not a noob anymore. There is few Mk4 kit at WO4.
It is not normal, and again this is one side of the update that will disappear with time. And again the other part of the update which reduce gap between rank will beneficiate all and that will stay for long. This is the end game. Mk7 owner are player that plays a lot, they cruise the game, again, soon you won't see them anymore.

Edited May 28, 2020 by Viking4s

[DieselPlatinum 5,121]

6 minutes ago, vourlo said:

Yes but this doesn't have to do with anything I said. I said the mk uptade is a bit crap because of what I just showed in the img. I also said that this dude in this rank is far superior. So what does the fact that he was lucky or that he was doing missions has to do with what I said. 

In your image post you practically called that player a "buyer". All I'm saying is that he could've gotten heavy crystal rewards from containers, which he might've used to buy the m2 fireworks kit while MUing his hunter. And the missions gave him the containers.

[E_polypterus 2,374]

36 minutes ago, vourlo said:

I can't think anything else. Either M system or Mk system are reasonable but the uptade-conversion was the bad one. 

For example if there was the mk from the beginning we wouldn't have anything like this now. 

Mk update was good imo. Without it players at mid ranks would find it quite hard to go through those ranks. It’s the same for low ranks though it wouldn’t have been much of a problem there if not for the introduction of MM. 

[vourlo 28]

10 minutes ago, Viking4s said:

At Wo4 and 5, i can confirm that you are not a noob anymore. There is few Mk4 kit at WO4.
It is not normal, and again this is one side of the update that will disappear with time. And again the other part of the update which reduce gap between rank will beneficiate all and that will stay for long. This is the end game. Mk7 owner are player that plays a lot, they cruise the game, again, soon you won't see them anymore.

Well I will see them. Here the thing. I am an experienced player okay. I have a bigger acc(field marshal) and two more big ranks. I know when to use supplies overdrive and so on. Thus I get a lot of exp in battle because I play efficiently. SOME of the players with mk7 may not have the same skills as I hv for example they don't even turn their turret or use supplies and/or overdrives inefficiently. This way they don't get so many exp as I do. They may be playing rarer than I do too so in the end we might be getting same exp for example. 

In pretty sure what I explained will happen because I can see it with my own eyes(non experienced players failing to rank up faster than me.)

[vourlo 28]

7 minutes ago, DieselPlatinum said:

In your image post you practically called that player a "buyer". All I'm saying is that he could've gotten heavy crystal rewards from containers, which he might've used to buy the m2 fireworks kit while MUing his hunter. And the missions gave him the containers.

Yeah okay but the main point in my post was not that he is a buyer or so. The main point is about the mk uptade. 

What he did with his equipment is not something important really. I didn't want to focus on that. 

[vourlo 28]

6 minutes ago, E_polypterus said:

Mk update was good imo. Without it players at mid ranks would find it quite hard to go through those ranks. It’s the same for low ranks though it wouldn’t have been much of a problem there if not for the introduction of MM. 

I said the exact same thing. Mk is a good system. BUT it shouldnt have changed the m system (or the opposite shouldn't have happened e.g. Mk--->M system) because now the game is imbalanced. 

Thus it was okay not to have m2 on wo or m3 in major. Now everything is scrambled. 

Edited May 28, 2020 by vourlo

[DieselPlatinum 5,121]

7 minutes ago, vourlo said:

1) Yeah okay but the main point in my post was not that he is a buyer or so. The main point is about the mk uptade. 

2) What he did with his equipment is not something important really. I didn't want to focus on that. 

1) honestly, who doesn't hate the MK update. I've stated many reasons why it was bad in the past.

2) then we won't discuss about it.

[vourlo 28]

4 hours ago, DieselPlatinum said:

1) honestly, who doesn't hate the MK update. I've stated many reasons why it was bad in the past.

2) then we won't discuss about it.

Nice and calm

 

Peace

[Juke.Box.Hero 11]

@ControlledChaos really dawg? inciting flooding bro? R u serious? Look at the replies afterwards and in no way was that inciting flooding. Where is the unlawful or hateful behavior and it's long because I wasn't gonna make a bunch of posts when I could have just made one. Probably could have made indents like suggested and probably will. Also, the font is recommended and key word to that is recommended, so if you (Tanki) didn't want it changed then make it unchangeable.

[wolverine848 13,097]

2 hours ago, Juke.Box.Hero said:

@ControlledChaos really dawg? inciting flooding bro? R u serious? Look at the replies afterwards and in no way was that inciting flooding. Where is the unlawful or hateful behavior and it's long because I wasn't gonna make a bunch of posts when I could have just made one. Probably could have made indents like suggested and probably will. Also, the font is recommended and key word to that is recommended, so if you (Tanki) didn't want it changed then make it unchangeable.

You can change font for emphasis - it's not supposed to be for your entire post.

I won't read it like that, and I'm sure many others won't either.

[MissaoGeneralissimo4 23]

On 5/20/2020 at 2:16 PM, FrozenRailgun said:

LOL, I haven't been playing for more than 2 months though. And how does throwing $$$ has to do with making "smart decision" or not?

It's because those players does not understand the need of matchmaking. Before the matchmaking update, Battle List was really garbage. Why? Because of Exp to Crystal earning was trash.

I think you need to study more of Tanki's history. In that time, the Battle list had more than 100 battles in just one mode, and the crystal earning was better than now, because the players decided in that years, the time of the battle, and a lot of other things. So, study a little and understand that your arguments don't make sense and that before Matchmaking, the game was good YES! Because of this matchmaking, many maps were forgotten, such as Fort Knox, Gravity, the Madness map was totally changed, and before, in addition to unlocking new equipment for your tank, you unlocked new maps, which also motivated players to keep growing in the game, since they could play on a map that was totally unknown to them.

It was easier to have just put a "Battle!" button at the top of the list of battles that you entered randomly into existing battles and that were YES a lot better than the current ones. Understand that at that time, the game economy was more balanced because, even if there was a big buyer in the battle, it was not very noticeable, since the players even in a longer battle won in the end more crystals and saved for the discounts that came in the celebrations. In addition, players had an entire tutorial to learn how to play, consequently leaving more skilled players in the game and also more intelligent and strategic on the battlefield.

 I say that because I've been playing since I was 9 years old and I saw almost everything that happened with that game. I witnessed the launch of Hammer in the game, I saw the appearance of the daily missions that we see, I saw the appearance of the premium account, of the XT equipment, which cost 500k crystals, which motivated even more the players of the highest level of the game to play a lot to buy this equipment and if they were very lucky, they could win it as a prize for long-term daily missions, like gaining 99999 XP, or killing 99999 tanks, I saw the new textures of the supplies, I saw the appearance of the Night mode in the game the Shaft laser, and much more than you probably ever dreamed it could have existed.

And, sadly for me, I saw the disappearance of 90% of the Brazilian (that I took part) community, which had more than 8 MILLION players. Speaking of which, this game reached levels higher than that of the population of Tokyo (the most populous city in the world).

[MissaoGeneralissimo4 23]

On 5/28/2020 at 1:10 PM, vourlo said:

Yes but this doesn't have to do with anything I said. I said the mk uptade is a bit crap because of what I just showed in the img. I also said that this dude in this rank is far superior. So what does the fact that he was lucky or that he was doing missions has to do with what I said. 

Man, the "Mk" update was bad because they didn't mad the thing that they made some years ago: The "Rebalance" (sell everything from our garage and let us make new decisions of new items. When they talked the first time about it, I liked, I thinked "hmm, now we will get more balance and a new variety of product kits." But after, I saw my garage and was a total mess. I had in that time a very powered garage, and a lot of good alterations (wihout buying). Well, My garage is good now, but, the biggest part is mk4-5. My best equipment is Fire Mk7 and Hunter mk6. Well, tecnicaly, was a good decision but was taken in the wrong format. That's my idea of Mk update.

[vourlo 28]

On 6/10/2020 at 1:33 AM, MissaoGeneralissimo4 said:

I think you need to study more of Tanki's history. In that time, the Battle list had more than 100 battles in just one mode, and the crystal earning was better than now, because the players decided in that years, the time of the battle, and a lot of other things. So, study a little and understand that your arguments don't make sense and that before Matchmaking, the game was good YES! Because of this matchmaking, many maps were forgotten, such as Fort Knox, Gravity, the Madness map was totally changed, and before, in addition to unlocking new equipment for your tank, you unlocked new maps, which also motivated players to keep growing in the game, since they could play on a map that was totally unknown to them.

It was easier to have just put a "Battle!" button at the top of the list of battles that you entered randomly into existing battles and that were YES a lot better than the current ones. Understand that at that time, the game economy was more balanced because, even if there was a big buyer in the battle, it was not very noticeable, since the players even in a longer battle won in the end more crystals and saved for the discounts that came in the celebrations. In addition, players had an entire tutorial to learn how to play, consequently leaving more skilled players in the game and also more intelligent and strategic on the battlefield.

 I say that because I've been playing since I was 9 years old and I saw almost everything that happened with that game. I witnessed the launch of Hammer in the game, I saw the appearance of the daily missions that we see, I saw the appearance of the premium account, of the XT equipment, which cost 500k crystals, which motivated even more the players of the highest level of the game to play a lot to buy this equipment and if they were very lucky, they could win it as a prize for long-term daily missions, like gaining 99999 XP, or killing 99999 tanks, I saw the new textures of the supplies, I saw the appearance of the Night mode in the game the Shaft laser, and much more than you probably ever dreamed it could have existed.

And, sadly for me, I saw the disappearance of 90% of the Brazilian (that I took part) community, which had more than 8 MILLION players. Speaking of which, this game reached levels higher than that of the population of Tokyo (the most populous city in the world).

Agree. NonMatchmaking battles where just fine...

[vourlo 28]

On 5/25/2020 at 9:21 PM, wolverine848 said:

We all know they don't know "simpler".  See Vulcan "fix" after Incendiary band came out.

So people can complain for now - since it is unfair - but they do have "work-arounds"... just don't play against them.  They WILL rank up (much faster) if they play.

Well u said back then that these players in my previous pics rank up much faster. Almost a month after this these are their rankings and mine:

(you can see their actual profile names in my url)

I was wo3 back then. Now im colonel rank.

Im playing on average for a couple of hours (less than 3h) everyday and i have 2 accs(so thats 1.5max for each acc every day). Both colonel ranks.( the other one was very low rank back then since it was a new acc)

And I am asking you, 

Did they make progress?

Will they ever make?

How will the new accounts be able to play against guys like these?

Do they actually rank up much faster than i do?

 

I would also like to point out that the majority of these players with extremely high gs in low ranks have this gs due to the many mus they ve done on a specific combo. Checking out their profiles you will probably see that one of their combos is super while others are way less powerful. Players that play with only one combo are players that usually can't get used to anything else. Simultaneously the majority of these players don't know how to turn their turret, which makes it even more difficult for them to rank up, even though they can destroy other poor normal players las if they were ants.