declined Can't pick up repair boxes if spawn immunity is active

[fghj240 3]

Basically, you wont be able to pick up repair kits if you have spawn immunity. Why? because you have full health and can't take damage! it won't do anything! If you are on the enemy's side, wasting their repair boxes might help, but after you spawn, you are on your own team's side, therefore if you accidentally run into a repair box, you'll just waste one.

[Maf 32,328]

Declined

Sometimes there's enemies on your side, and you want to take repair kits from them right after you spawn. Either way, this is quite a minor feature and isn't worth the effort to implement.

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

This is an alright idea. Outright declining this is an overreach of moderator power. 

[alkyng 3,081]

I agree with Maf, If we blocked someways of playing because it's inappropriate the playing will become less strategic.

what if they also prevent you from shooting if one of your allies forward you, because you don't need to shot and knock your teammate,

what if they also prevent you from using Dictator OD if some one in your team have use it before some second, safe it for another time,

what if they prevent you from self-destruction if you're not flipping upside-down, because you didn't really want to do

what if they prevent you from supply boxes from ground if you already have this supply active, give your teammate opportunity

 Believe me if they do anything from what I said above the playing role will be less strategic and haven't any funny in playing

[Viking4s 10,791]

4 hours ago, sensei_tanker said:

This is an alright idea. Outright declining this is an overreach of moderator power. 

Maf replies is perfect and full of common sense. Developers focus on ideas that generate revenue (new turret, new hul, ....).
Making more restriction for players is just inappropriate, especially for this trial gain. What is going on with players who want more babysitting feature?
 

[Viking4s 10,791]

3 hours ago, asem.harbi said:

I agree with Maf, If we blocked someways of playing because it's inappropriate the playing will become less strategic.

what if they also prevent you from shooting if one of your allies forward you, because you don't need to shot and knock your teammate,

what if they also prevent you from using Dictator OD if some one in your team have use it before some second, safe it for another time,

what if they prevent you from self-destruction if you're not flipping upside-down, because you didn't really want to do

what if they prevent you from supply boxes from ground if you already have this supply active, give your teammate opportunity

 Believe me if they do anything from what I said above the playing role will be less strategic and haven't any funny in playing

that makes lot of sense.

[fghj240 3]

4 hours ago, asem.harbi said:

I agree with Maf, If we blocked someways of playing because it's inappropriate the playing will become less strategic.

what if they also prevent you from shooting if one of your allies forward you, because you don't need to shot and knock your teammate,

what if they also prevent you from using Dictator OD if some one in your team have use it before some second, safe it for another time,

what if they prevent you from self-destruction if you're not flipping upside-down, because you didn't really want to do

what if they prevent you from supply boxes from ground if you already have this supply active, give your teammate opportunity

 Believe me if they do anything from what I said above the playing role will be less strategic and haven't any funny in playing

Huh. that reminds me. Why can you push your teammates with a shot? 

[sensei_tanker 3,098]

6 hours ago, Viking4s said:

Maf replies is perfect and full of common sense. Developers focus on ideas that generate revenue (new turret, new hul, ....).
Making more restriction for players is just inappropriate, especially for this trial gain. What is going on with players who want more babysitting feature?

Time again and again has shown that the developers often come out with an update that Maf doesn't necessarily like. We are having a discussion right now, so it makes sense to be "Under Review." The tag "Declined" should mean that the idea violates one of the I&S rules for topics or has already been declined by the developers themselves. The tag "Under Review" means that some people have differing opinions and that the idea is possible to be implemented given the current information. How is this a babysitting feature? Please elaborate.

5 hours ago, fghj240 said:

Huh. that reminds me. Why can you push your teammates with a shot? 

So parkourists won't cry

[Viking4s 10,791]

Just now, sensei_tanker said:

Time again and again has shown that the developers often come out with an update that Maf doesn't necessarily like. We are having a discussion right now, so it makes sense to be "Under Review." The tag "Declined" should mean that the idea violates one of the I&S rules for topics or has already been declined by the developers themselves. The tag "Under Review" means that some people have differing opinions and that the idea is possible to be implemented given the current information. How is this a babysitting feature? Please elaborate.

Sorry, can't spend more time on this trivial thingy. Lucky you Maf and co is spending time to manage this, that save time to the developers.

Rest re-assured that even if thi is declined, the idea is still reported to the dev and by some miracle they like it you will know in due time. 

[alkyng 3,081]

some ideas doesn't need to reach to the developers to know how it's wrong, like if you suggest an idea like remove the smoky turret from the game - surely the developers will not do that and no need from administrators here to reach some idea like this