Spectator-Only "Game Mode"

[Vertz 2]

I think it would be interesting and easier, a new '' Spectator battle mode '', in which you could only enter spectator mode in that format, the mode could only give 1 exp per kill and not contain a battle fund. And with a limit of 2 spectators in the battle of "Spectator battle mode". Being able to create the "battle" only if it is private!

I think that this way it would not be necessary to make a complete reformulation of the Spectator. As Maf once said on a topic of suggestion.. I think it would be more practical than the idea of '' Rent A Spectator ''. 

Sorry for the English, I don't know much -(:

[Devoid 2,603]

Declined.

 

Your idea is essentially discussing the idea of giving everyone Spectator Mode, but in a weird, mixed up fashion, where it is a very specific game mode...To me, that just doesn't make any sense; if everyone was able to use Spectator Mode in this particular mode, why not just give Spectator to every player? Fortunately, that particular idea has already been suggested, and could come out, but it is just simply not logical to add a new game mode, just to give people playing it Spectator Mode, as your idea suggests.

 

Spoiler

16 minutes ago, OutlesS said:

you could only enter spectator mode in that format, the mode could only give 1 exp per kill and not contain a battle fund.

If you could only enter Spectator Mode, and not play in this mode, the mode wouldn't serve any purpose (as you can't record gameplay, take screenshos of tanks, etc.), and the battle would be automatically be deleted after a period of time (as it stands, if a battle doesn't have anyone playing in it, it is deleted after a short time, regardless of whether there are Spectators in the battle or not; I know this from experience). Unfortunately, that would defeat the point of your suggested "game mode."

[Vertz 2]

41 minutes ago, Mr.Nibbles said:

If you could only enter Spectator Mode, and not play in this mode, the battle would be automatically be deleted after a period of time (as it stands, if a battle doesn't have anyone playing in it, it is deleted after a short time, regardless of whether there are Spectators in the battle or not; I know this from experience).

Players(Friends) could join the battle to play, while one records others other players play the battle. It couldn't just be the viewer who could enter the mode... You got it wrong

Example:

I have a clan and I want to hold a tournament between my 1v1 members. But I want to record for YouTube. Or take a picture, record a rank'up, record drops gold box. Among others

The mode cited would serve that purpose. All players would have access, but with the mode having limits. 

I don't think a spectator is necessary for all modes, there would certainly be cheating(trapaças). And loss of players in battles

I don't think it's a confusing idea. And I find it easy to understand

 

[Devoid 2,603]

Just now, OutlesS said:

 

Regardless, I think there's a higher likelihood of Spectator Mode for everyone coming out...

[Vertz 2]

Okay, it's my suggestion I don't know if I was clear. I don't know much English as I said.

Thankssss xd -)