invalid some suggestions to more fun than tanki

[1375 7]

I have some ideas for hulls:

1) Adding immunity against Wasp, Viking, Crusader and Ares overdrive.

2) The number of turrets has increased over the years (there are now 15 turrets in  game) but the number of active protections remains at three. Especially with  recent update (critical damage), we have to assign one of the protections to Armadillo and two protections are too few for the various turrets of game. For this reason, I suggest adding at least one to the number of active protections.

3) In game, there are 9 Augments for each hull, and if new Augments mentioned in suggestion 1 are agreed upon, this number will increase to 13. I think augments for hulls are different from turrets. In turrets, it is not possible to activate two or more augments at same time, in hulls this is possible. with respect to  large number of different effects (AP, EMP, Stun, Heat, Freeze, different ODs, etc.), I suggest adding two new augments for all hulls: the first adds  one augment to  number of active augments ( That is, it is not an augment itself, but with this augment, that hull has two places to adding augments) priced at 4,999 tankoins, and the latter adds two augments to  number of active augments priced at 9,999 tankoins.
I have all of augments for all  hulls but due to the limit of one augment for each hull, I do not enjoy playing much. I have to activate AP immunity (considering recent challenges that have given two of  APs to tankers at a low price; although I already had all of APs by buying a lot of Ultra Containers!) But I suffer from the fact that although I can be safe against EMP, heat, stun, ..., why can I use only one augment? It does not show all of my abilities at all and it bothers me.

[Spy 14,715]

Hi, 

1) While it sounds like an interesting idea, it wouldn't work - There will be too many hull augments.

2) This one is actually planned, check the test server (server 1) and you will see that you can buy another protection slot for 1,000 tankoins.

3) This idea was proposed in the past, but we have decided to decline it because it would benefit buyers much more than non-buyers, making the gab between the two much larger.

Next time, please make a separate topic for each idea.

Invalid, closed.