Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Episode 294 of the V-LOG is live!


Marcus
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, yellowghetto said:

Because Tanki usually charges 3000-5000 for extra stuff. Like Clan License, rename pass, Hull Augments, think about it. 

 

1000 is a good price.

2nd slot is 250

3rd slot is 500

4th is 1000

Tankcoins.  Not crystals.   1000 TK for F2P tankers is not a good price.

Clan License and Rename pass do not affect in-battle play.  They are pure luxury.

Hull augments we all know are OP - and many (most?) players are not happy about them costing TKs.

Sounds like you are in favour of widening the power gap between buyers and F2P tankers.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wolverine848 said:

Tankcoins.  Not crystals.   1000 TK for F2P tankers is not a good price.

Clan License and Rename pass do not affect in-battle play.  They are pure luxury.

Hull augments we all know are OP - and many (most?) players are not happy about them costing TKs.

Sounds like you are in favour of widening the power gap between buyers and F2P tankers.

Maybe I am :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Event Mode should be related to Space...

Lunatic Mode:

Hopper

Freeze

Madness

Space Mode

That way Keyboard Warriors would have a little more chances at catching golds, or maybe nothing at all, who knows.

Edited by lssimo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For my honest opinion I'm not liking the 4th slot either free or with tankoins, I see 3 is a pretty enough. Except if they want to make the protections % proportional to their number like equipping 4 will means 35/35/35/35 not 50/50/50/50.

But it seems they haven't did this for a balance principle, but just wanting buyers to pay just a few more $ for the new 1000TX.

5 hours ago, yellowghetto said:

Regarding the 4th Module slot, I hope it will be 1000 Tankoins at least.

Why you suggest it to be 1000 tankoins at least ?  honestly I haven't understood you mindset. 1000 at least? ok what you suggest for "at most"? 3000 or 5000 tankoins?

Increasing the value of something wont make it rarer as developers assume, but it will just widening the gap between non-buyers and buyers.   But if terms like Rarer or Exotic attracting your mind for the things that in real are just P2W but with a cover of Rare, that's your problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, asem.harbi said:

For my honest opinion I'm not liking the 4th slot either free or with tankoins, I see 3 is a pretty enough. Except if they want to make the protections % proportional to their number like equipping 4 will means 35/35/35/35 not 50/50/50/50.

But it seems they haven't did this for a balance principle, but just wanting buyers to pay just a few more $ for the new 1000TX.

Why you suggest it to be 1000 tankoins at least ?  honestly I haven't understood you mindset. 1000 at least? ok what you suggest for "at most"? 3000 or 5000 tankoins?

Increasing the value of something wont make it rarer as developers assume, but it will just widening the gap between non-buyers and buyers.   But if terms like Rarer or Exotic attracting your mind for the things that in real are just P2W but with a cover of Rare, that's your problem.

What about 100000 Tankoins ?

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, At_Shin said:

May I ask how is that banner depicting the objectification of women?

We are seeing a woman cosmonaut in that banner. The world has seen many woman cosmonauts till date. Isn't it for the better that tanki is depicting women as being cosmonauts too? 

sir the banner showing a woman in space is fine I have no issue with that. it's a great thing woman are getting into science it's good for us to do.

it the image showing a skinny sexy lady I have issues with, have you even seen any postings from tanki showing a good looking man with muscles and a 6 pack ( tight stomach ). so far not as long as I have been here, it's always has been showing a woman .

  • Haha 2
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bydo said:

sir the banner showing a woman in space is fine I have no issue with that. it's a great thing woman are getting into science it's good for us to do.

it the image showing a skinny sexy lady I have issues with, have you even seen any postings from tanki showing a good looking man with muscles and a 6 pack ( tight stomach ). so far not as long as I have been here, it's always has been showing a woman .

Should a portly or even obese woman be shown as a cosmonaut?

Are there not health/physical requirements to going into space?  Don't recall seeing too many fat astronauts, but I'm no expert.  Would you be happier if they added 5-10lbs onto the fictional character displayed in the artwork?

How are you going to see a "6 pack" through a flight-suit?

How do you know that person displayed is not transgender?

Take a step back and breath for a minute or two...

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys you got a bad taste, she is not sexy nor even a beautiful.

But yes the suit is skinny, which doesn't seems appropriate.

2 hours ago, wolverine848 said:

How do you know that person displayed is not transgender?

So Tanki designed this banner as a transgender woman not a real woman !

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Bydo said:

sir the banner showing a woman in space is fine I have no issue with that. it's a great thing woman are getting into science it's good for us to do.

it the image showing a skinny sexy lady I have issues with, have you even seen any postings from tanki showing a good looking man with muscles and a 6 pack ( tight stomach ). so far not as long as I have been here, it's always has been showing a woman .

 

Just now, wolverine848 said:

Should a portly or even obese woman be shown as a cosmonaut?

Are there not health/physical requirements to going into space?  Don't recall seeing too many fat astronauts, but I'm no expert.  Would you be happier if they added 5-10lbs onto the fictional character displayed in the artwork?

How are you going to see a "6 pack" through a flight-suit?

How do you know that person displayed is not transgender?

Take a step back and breath for a minute or two...

 

Just now, asem.harbi said:

Guys you got a bad taste, she is not sexy nor even a beautiful.

But yes the suit is skinny, which doesn't seems appropriate.

So Tanki designed this banner as a transgender woman not a real woman !

She actually looks like American actress Joan Rivers.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wolverine848 said:

Should a portly or even obese woman be shown as a cosmonaut?

Are there not health/physical requirements to going into space?  Don't recall seeing too many fat astronauts, but I'm no expert.  Would you be happier if they added 5-10lbs onto the fictional character displayed in the artwork?

How are you going to see a "6 pack" through a flight-suit?

How do you know that person displayed is not transgender?

Take a step back and breath for a minute or two...

took a long hard breath in , can I let go now..

sir if they can make it tight on a woman , they can make it tight on a man. real suits don't look like that in space . check out NASA web pages. sure not all woman in space are over sized but they are not tooth picks , they do have some fat on them .

NASA requirements: — Measure between 149.5 cm and 190.5 cm (4-10 and 6-3), and weigh between 50 and 95 kilograms (110 and 209 pounds).

 

23 minutes ago, Tanker-Arthur said:

 

 

She actually looks like American actress Joan Rivers.

lol good one.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bydo said:

sir if they can make it tight on a woman , they can make it tight on a man. real suits don't look like that in space . check out NASA web pages. sure not all woman in space are over sized but they are not tooth picks , they do have some fat on them .

NASA requirements: — Measure between 149.5 cm and 190.5 cm (4-10 and 6-3), and weigh between 50 and 95 kilograms (110 and 209 pounds).

Flight suits are not the same as space-suits.  They will show general body-shape (busty or not) but a 6-pack?  I don't think so.

NASA requirements are for... ALL genders?  A man in good shape can weigh 209 even if between 5'11 and 6'3.  Think Hockey players.

A woman weighing 209 lbs?  To be in "astronaut shape" she'd have to be basketball player height - which probably exceeds the height requirement.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wolverine848 said:

Flight suits are not the same as space-suits.  They will show general body-shape (busty or not) but a 6-pack?  I don't think so.

NASA requirements are for... ALL genders?  A man in good shape can weigh 209 even if between 5'11 and 6'3.  Think Hockey players.

A woman weighing 209 lbs?  To be in "astronaut shape" she'd have to be basketball player height - which probably exceeds the height requirement.

sir your missing the point. if they can draw a woman with all the curves , then they can also do a man with his 6 pack in a tight suit.

for the real  astronaut . yea they have not created a suit that is safe to wear so tight yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bydo said:

sir your missing the point. if they can draw a woman with all the curves , then they can also do a man with his 6 pack in a tight suit.

for the real  astronaut . yea they have not created a suit that is safe to wear so tight yet

Well, I couldn't care what they put on the sign.  I barely notice them while I'm trying to destroy a tank and they are trying to destroy me.

Currently TO is discriminating against 2-headed aliens also.  Oh well...

Edited by wolverine848
  • Like 2
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/10/2021 at 12:59 PM, Bydo said:

sir the banner showing a woman in space is fine I have no issue with that. it's a great thing woman are getting into science it's good for us to do.

it the image showing a skinny sexy lady I have issues with, have you even seen any postings from tanki showing a good looking man with muscles and a 6 pack ( tight stomach ). so far not as long as I have been here, it's always has been showing a woman .

The bunnies from the easter's banner did look a bit skinny too, the lady might not had much to eat from them. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2021 at 6:21 AM, Tanker-Arthur said:

They should put some random promo codes on the signs sometimes. ?

No, this would encourage multing!  People will stare at the signs instead of participating in the battle. ?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...