declined VIP Premium membership should be able to kick players

[alkyng 3,081]

Hi guys

Premium account now look pale and uninteresting, it does have no real touchable features. So I have a suggestion today which is may exist in some other games

In the Battle List (or Pro-battles in antique name), if a VIP Premium player want to join a full battle, a non-VIP player from the battle will get kicked, so the VIP player will take the place.

This works for Parkour battles, a random player will be kicked. But also it works with the other normal battle, the lowest player in the team will get kicked if the score was lesser than 500.

This BTW will generate to make the Premium account price higher, to not make this be abused, which is common sense.

 

[Iron_Man 2,376]

Declined

Firstly, Ideas regarding increase of rewards are not accepted.

Secondly, I do not think it is good to give the ability to kick players, to Premium accounts. Some play matches for fun and it would not be justified to kick them on the basis of score. Currently there are enough Pay-to-win features in the game, to infuriate the player base, and more would only result in exodus of non-buyers.

[Maf 32,326]

I agree about Premium needing some new perks, but being able to join a full PRO battle at the expense of a non-premium user getting kicked is just too far. There are more user-friendly ways to implement this, such as Premium players having priority when a spot opens up, or an extra slot being available for Premium only.

However, PRO battles are such a minor thing in the game these days that it's pointless to give perks for them specifically. It would be far more cost-effective to add new perks in matchmaking battles.

[Arjun24 156]

I can't be the only one who thinks Pro battles are mostly used for rank up's nowadays. It wouldn't be nice if you would not have premium and just abruptly be kicked from battle. Premium should get some improvements for mm.

[mjmj5558 2,346]

5 hours ago, Maf said:

I agree about Premium needing some new perks, 

I disagree. Premium account already gives you a lot of stars and crystals, which can help a lot. I feel that it's okay as it is.

[wolverine848 13,097]

11 hours ago, asem.harbi said:

Hi guys

Premium account now look pale and uninteresting, it does no have a real touchable features. So I have a suggestion today which is my exist in some other games

In the Battle List (or Pro-battles in antique name), if a VIP Premium player want to join a full battle, a non-VIP player from the battle will get kicked, so the VIP player will take its place.

This works for Parkour battles, a random player will be kicked. But also it works with the other normal battle, the lowest player in the team will get kicked if its score was lesser than 500.

This BTW will generate to make the Premium account price higher, to not make this be abused, which is common sense.

 

This   HAS  to be a joke   

[wolverine848 13,097]

5 hours ago, Maf said:

or an extra slot being available for Premium only.

Wait ... wut?     8 vs ... 9?

[Maf 32,326]

24 minutes ago, wolverine848 said:

Wait ... wut?     8 vs ... 9?

Yes, and the team with 9 players cannot accept any more players (premium or not) until another premium player joins the smaller team. So essentially it works just like a partially filled game with auto-balance. The only question is what the limit of extra slots should be. In another game where this was an actual feature, it was limited up to 20% extra players, so a 10v10 could become a 12v12 with premium users joining. 

[wolverine848 13,097]

1 hour ago, Maf said:

Yes, and the team with 9 players cannot accept any more players (premium or not) until another premium player joins the smaller team. So essentially it works just like a partially filled game with auto-balance. The only question is what the limit of extra slots should be. In another game where this was an actual feature, it was limited up to 20% extra players, so a 10v10 could become a 12v12 with premium users joining. 

And if another premium player does not try to join ... that team with 8 is at disadvantage for the entire battle?

NO THANKS.   

[Maf 32,326]

1 hour ago, wolverine848 said:

And if another premium player does not try to join ... that team with 8 is at disadvantage for the entire battle?

NO THANKS.   

Doesn't it already happen? Haven't played PRO for a while, but I remember there often being situations where one team remains at a player count disadvantage for a long time.

[alkyng 3,081]

3 hours ago, wolverine848 said:

This   HAS  to be a joke   

I must elaborate my side here because I think most of the players maybe think me sarcastic

I'm just suggesting any idea comes to me, either if I agree or disagree with, if I felt the idea have a prospect to be applied I don't mind to suggest it. I'm not kidding in this idea nor I'm serious. And if they accepted one of my ideas that I disagree with, I will be the first one to criticize the update.

So approximately all of the ideas I suggest I'm not sarcastic or kidding, but many of them I just disagree with. In example "The loser team should get less rewards" & "The tank should stay in the battle after leaving" I'm serious and agree with them. But ideas like "The protection should be able to go above 100%" (if you remember) & this idea, I'm being serious but disagree with.

So non of my ideas being just sarcastic or trolling.

[Poppy 422]

13 minutes ago, asem.harbi said:

And if they accepted one of my ideas that I disagree with, I will be the first one to criticize the update.

Now are you sure you are not being sarcastic?

[wolverine848 13,097]

36 minutes ago, Maf said:

Doesn't it already happen? Haven't played PRO for a while, but I remember there often being situations where one team remains at a player count disadvantage for a long time.

Well there's no need to make the problem even worse.  Once a team is maxed out that should be it.

And what are the odds this Premium player will join the losing team?

The other situation, don't need a person with Premium to fill the gap.  So there's less of a chance going short for a long period.